• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UK Health Care: Babies Born in Corridors

she said it's "not sustainable"

context

motivation

there ya go

Nothing you post is going to change the fact you grossly, and quite humoursly, used the wrong source to promote your agenda.
 
You're concerned alright.

Concerned that no matter what happens, you do not wish to see those 47 million ever receive health insurance.

so, now the personality whore has become MIND READER

LOLOLOL!
 
Nothing you post is going to change the fact you grossly, and quite humoursly, used the wrong source to promote your agenda.

nope, she said it

sorry

humoursly?

LOL!
 
so, now the personality whore has become MIND READER

LOLOLOL!

Your personal insults are not interesting, creative or funny.

It is a desperate last ditch effort to steer the conversation away from your misapplication of a source.

Whats the next enterprise prof? Referencing Satan to champion the teachings of Jesus?
 
personality whore turned mind reader now makes folks' arguments for them

you're arguing with yourself

and you're boring yourself to death
 
she said it's "not sustainable"

context

motivation

there ya go

She

Said

It

Was

Not

Sustainable

Without

Changes.

Those

Last

Two

Words

Are

Important

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLZ!
 
personality whore turned mind reader now makes folks' arguments for them

you're arguing with yourself

and you're boring yourself to death

I appreciate the effort to bait me into insulting you with cheap words, but it will not happen.

The issue is your comical use of Doig to advance the anti-public option enterprise.

How many "LOL's" is it going to take this time?

Whats on tomorrows agenda? Invoke David Duke to foster multiculturalism?
 
Last edited:
I appreciate the effort to bait me into insulting you with cheap words, but it will not happen.

The issue is your comical use of Doig to advance the anti-public option enterprise.

How many "LOL's" is it going to take this time?

So let me see if I understand you. Since Doig is in favor of the Canadian model of health care, and only wants to modify it a little to fix the problems with it, that trying to claim she said something completely different by selecting quotes out of context is dishonest? Hard to believe any one would be dishonest in the health care debate....

Think he will admit he took her words out of context?
 
Last edited:
Think he will admit he took her words out of context?


No, because it is not about accuracy, honesty and dignity with prof.

Its about him, and his emotional agenda.
 
ah, the true colors of the personality whore

discussing other posters

exclusively

LOLOL!

dr doig said it was "not sustainable"

ie, heading towards bankruptcy

your turn
 
that it's heading towards bankruptcy?

It has a funding problem, yes. They are looking at solutions within the context of their health care system to fix it. They are specifically not looking at a US style system of health care, but to make changes to their style of health care.
 
ah, the true colors of the personality whore

discussing other posters

exclusively

LOLOL!

dr doig said it was "not sustainable"

ie, heading towards bankruptcy

your turn


As I told you before, no amount of insulting words will shepherd the issue away from your whimsical misuse of Doig.

Its all about you, and your fanatical motives regarding the anti-public option campaign.

So spare me your duplicitous curiosity regarding Canada's health system.
 
Last edited:
Its all about you

LOLOLOL!!!

for you, apparently, it sure is

except, you mean, "it's"

"its" is possessive

"it's" is a contraction for "it is"

4th grade (here in the states, that is)

eh?
 
As I told you before, no amount of insulting words will shepherd the issue away from your whimsical misuse of Doig.

Its all about you, and your fanatical motives regarding the anti-public option campaign.

So spare me your duplicitous curiosity regarding Canada's health system.

and you actually edited THAT?

LOLOLOL!
 
LOLOLOL!!!

for you, apparently, it sure is

except, you mean, "it's"

"its" is possessive

"it's" is a contraction for "it is"

4th grade (here in the states, that is)

eh?

I find the above post quite goofy, considering your writing style.

Nevertheless, it is not important.

Running out of "LOL's" and shifting toward grammar and punctuation issues will not pilot the issue away from your misuse of Doig as a source.

Like I said, its all about you and your emotional agenda.
 
Last edited:
1. i don't care about your "findings," you're nuts

2. if it's not important why bring it up?

3. like i said, everyone around here knows that FOR YOU it's all about ME

4. that's cuz you're a personality whore

5. the canadian health care system is on a "not sustainable" path, according to the dear, darling and dainty doc

6. rather unemotionally, she comes across as very level headed

7. LOLOLOL!

8. your turn
 
1. i don't care about your "findings," you're nuts

2. if it's not important why bring it up?

3. like i said, everyone around here knows that FOR YOU it's all about ME

4. that's cuz you're a personality whore

5. the canadian health care system is on a "not sustainable" path, according to the dear, darling and dainty doc

6. rather unemotionally, she comes across as very level headed

7. LOLOLOL!

8. your turn

You're not going to successfully pilot the issue away from your misuse of Doig as a source to advance the anti-public option agenda of yours.

I know why you are here, you know why you are here. And it sure as hell isn't about honestly discussing Canada's health care issues.

You could care less.
 
yup

2 + 2 = 4

I see you still have problems with taking quotes out of context. Let me show you another example of taking quotes out of context that is on par with what you just did:

i don't care

if it's

important

i

personality whore

dear, darling and dainty

Did you know you where an uncaring dear, darling and dainty personality whore? See how context is important?
 
You're not going to successfully pilot the issue away from your misuse of Doig as a source to advance the anti-public option agenda of yours.

I know why you are here, you know why you are here. And it sure as hell isn't about honestly discussing Canada's health care issues.

You could care less.

the personality whore is mind reading again

canada's on an unsustainable path, i think that's real sad

"to successfully pilot" is a split infinitive

never insert any word between "to" and any verb

to run, to jump, to state a "subjective viewpoint" as opposed to an "empirical claim"---infinitive form of verb, don't split it

you want to APPEAR educated, i appreciate
 
1. i don't care about your "findings," you're nuts

2. if it's not important why bring it up?

3. like i said, everyone around here knows that FOR YOU it's all about ME

4. that's cuz you're a personality whore

5. the canadian health care system is on a "not sustainable" path, according to the dear, darling and dainty doc

6. rather unemotionally, she comes across as very level headed

7. LOLOLOL!

8. your turn

She said it was on an unsustainable path without changes. She also said they where not adopting a US type system. Why is this hard for you? When it's all said and done, Canada is still going to have UHC.
 
tell it to the president of the canadian medical assn

"(Canadians) have to understand that the system that we have right now - if it keeps on going without change - is not sustainable," said Doig

Funny enough that is exactly what most people say about the US medical system too!
 
Back
Top Bottom