• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Finance Committee to drop end-of-life provision

i think you understand every word

that's your problem

with me

which, who could possibly care
 
Prof don't forget

Seroquel

Zyprexa

Clozaril

Thorazine, Largactil

and P-P-P Prolixin

Do not

drink

on MEDS.
 
hazlnut, you're turning into a personality whore
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
First off, the only occasion I can think of off of the top of my head where the federal government attempted to involved itself in the end of life decisions of a private individual was when the Republicans did it with Terri Schiavo, the brain dead woman in Florida.
Click to expand...

Yup, and you liberals won that battle... She was murdered just like you wanted.

But at least it was for a good reason... The husband was tired of visiting her.

It's just like abortion is with you all isn't it? You condone murder, as long as it serves as a solution to problems caused by irresponsible behaviour... and of course, for convienence... as was in the Terri Shivo case.

Hurray for the liberals!

.
 
Grim17 said:
Yup, and you liberals won that battle... She was murdered just like you wanted.

But at least it was for a good reason... The husband was tired of visiting her.

It's just like abortion is with you all isn't it? You condone murder, as long as it serves as a solution to problems caused by irresponsible behaviour... and of course, for convienence... as was in the Terri Shivo case.

Hurray for the liberals!

.
Click to expand...

Wait, you mean we can murder people who are already dead? So, are those archeologists to be tried for murder now?
 
sam_w said:
Wait, you mean we can murder people who are already dead? So, are those archeologists to be tried for murder now?
Click to expand...

Well that's exactly what you did, when you all won the right to pull her feeding tubes and starve her to death.

And you wonder why Sarah Palin is worried about how her son, as well as other children with Downs syndrome, will be treated with government run health care.

.
 
archaeology

LOL!

mummies don't have feeding tubes

mommies might

but not mummies

reductio ad absurdum

it means a lack of self respect
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom