• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ark. crowd mocks lawmakers over Obama health plan

If everyone is getting paid to do this but me, I'm gonna be pissed.

Indeed.
I haven't got my cheque through the door yet.
 
1-it was part time workers who submitted falsified forms, ACORN caught them
2 - nonsense, prove it
3 - prove it
4 - referring to 1 again, aren't you?

You claimed ACORN pays people to disrupt Republican events. Why didn't you refer to that in your litany of crimes?


So, you're admitting you're wilfully blind to ACORN's subversive activities.

Good for you.
 
Don't even give me that damn "It's not in the Constitution". You know what, there is a whole hell of a lot of things NOT in the Constitution. Do you really want to go down that road? Why hasn't Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, blah blah blah all been ruled un-Constitutional?

I've no problem with ending all those unconstitutional programs, in fact, it's an outcome I desire.

As to why they haven't been ruled out? Simple, the courts follow the political winds.

Welcome to the real world.
 
:rofl By your own argument....2000-2006 anyone?

Oh, and do look back in the historical record why don't you, specifically those years that Reagan submitted budgets asking for more than Congress wanted to spend. Do look into this please, you are sorely in need of education.

You mean the budget requests that Tip O'Neill immediately ignored and wrote bills for whatever he felt like? The actuall bills presented to the President didn't look like what he asked for, that's certain.

'Cuz, guess what, the Congress originates the spending bills, not the White House. Perhaps you should learn some basic civics sometime.
 
Last edited:
When you make insurance an entitlement you include high risk individuals and thus drive up the costs for everyone.

And, when it becomes and entitlement, only the entitlement class will be able to get it, without having their eyeballs pulled out to pay for it.
 
You mean the budget requests that Tip O'Neill immediately ignored and wrote bills for whatever he felt like? The actuall bills presented to the President didn't look like what he asked for, that's certain.

'Cuz, guess what, the Congress originates the spending bills, not the White House. Perhaps you should learn some basic civics sometime.

History ....start with 1985's budget....follow the leads...ta da...get back to me when you have read up.

Actually, now that I think of it, go through my earliest threads here. I long since shot this down. Or do a search where I posted about David Stockman. It is all there. And yes, YOU have to do the work, I am too sick and tired of having to repeat this to the ignorant.

p.s. WHile you are doing your research, 1985 is the key year as Stockman quit then...significance to budgets. I shall say no more, carry on.
 
Last edited:
History ....start with 1985's budget....follow the leads...ta da...get back to me when you have read up.

Actually, now that I think of it, go through my earliest threads here. I long since shot this down. Or do a search where I posted about David Stockman. It is all there. And yes, YOU have to do the work, I am too sick and tired of having to repeat this to the ignorant.

p.s. WHile you are doing your research, 1985 is the key year as Stockman quit then...significance to budgets. I shall say no more, carry on.

Better yet, let's start with 1985's budget, zero out all spending on non-defense programs, and see what happens to the deficit.

You keep missing the part about the spending the Democrats push on us being unconstitutional, and hence illegal.

Why is that?
 
Here is a video of the townhall meeting in question. Disregard the captions.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVpa5IoiF_g"]YouTube - Vic Snyder & Mike Ross Healthcare Townhall 01[/ame]
 
Better yet, let's start with 1985's budget, zero out all spending on non-defense programs, and see what happens to the deficit.

You keep missing the part about the spending the Democrats push on us being unconstitutional, and hence illegal.

Why is that?
To paraphrase, he's already admitted he doesn't care about the constitution if he feels something is right by his standards.
 
The ENTIRE STORY is about the claim of protestors being paid and bused in. You ask what part to watch? How about everything between the beginning and the end?

Claims do not constitute proof of anything. What specific evidence do you have that people were being paid and bussed in by corporate interests?
 
Claims do not constitute proof of anything. What specific evidence do you have that people were being paid and bussed in by corporate interests?
Apparently "cause he and Sam W. say so" is supposed to suffice.:doh
 
This is the legacy of FDR, his true bleak legacy. He changed American's view of Government, into a source of "stuff for me" and engendered an entitlement mentality that LBJ Later strengthened.

We have to ween ourselves off Government, though I fear it's too late and we'll soon all just be chained in slavery TO the Government.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the worst American president, and will never be exceeded. Even BO would have to work hard to out due him. The payroll tax deduction was the biggest trick on the American population in history. If it weren't for that, you wouldn't see half the programs passed that have.
 
Claims do not constitute proof of anything. What specific evidence do you have that people were being paid and bussed in by corporate interests?

Is there any part of the report that you wish to claim is untrue? I am not the one investigating these lobbyists, NBC News did that. If you believe they got something wrong, tell us what it is.
 
Is there any part of the report that you wish to claim is untrue? I am not the one investigating these lobbyists, NBC News did that. If you believe they got something wrong, tell us what it is.





Still operating from your democrat talking points I see....


Tell me if they were bussed in. Where are the pictures of the buses?
 
Still operating from your democrat talking points I see....


Tell me if they were bussed in. Where are the pictures of the buses?

What is this obsession with busses? Go to the RecessRally website and join one of their caravans if you want to ride a bus.
Meanwhile, NBC's investigation of this "spontaneous groundswell" continued last night, revealing some congressmen have received death threats, and one was hung in effigy outside his office. Is this democracy, or does it sound more like Kristalnacht?

[ame=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#32323732]Rachel Maddow Show[/ame]
 
What is this obsession with busses? Go to the RecessRally website and join one of their caravans if you want to ride a bus.
Meanwhile, NBC's investigation of this "spontaneous groundswell" continued last night, revealing some congressmen have received death threats, and one was hung in effigy outside his office. Is this democracy, or does it sound more like Kristalnacht?

Rachel Maddow Show





How come you have not had the same bloviating on the Unions that are being sent to intimidate the town hall protestors?


Got Hypocrisy?
 
How come you have not had the same bloviating on the Unions that are being sent to intimidate the town hall protestors?


Got Hypocrisy?

If rightwing thugs attempt to stop the democratic process by shouting down town hall meetings, I approve any necessary actions to stop them and allow democracy to proceed. If the AFL-CIO, Teamsters or Tony Soprano want to send in enforcers to drag these people out of the meetings by their heels and put them back on their buses, I approve it.
Anyone who attends a town hall meeting with questions and opinions is welcome, but when organized groups attempt to disrupt those meetings and not allow them to proceed, that is vigilantism, and should be met with strong physical confrontation.
 
If rightwing thugs attempt to stop the democratic process by shouting down town hall meetings, I approve any necessary actions to stop them and allow democracy to proceed. If the AFL-CIO, Teamsters or Tony Soprano want to send in enforcers to drag these people out of the meetings by their heels and put them back on their buses, I approve it.
Anyone who attends a town hall meeting with questions and opinions is welcome, but when organized groups attempt to disrupt those meetings and not allow them to proceed, that is vigilantism, and should be met with strong physical confrontation.





hypocrisy noted..... Your organized groups are ok, but the made up ones in your head are not....

And you want to fight percieved vigilantisism, with more vigilantism and violence? how telling of your character... :lol:


How pathetically an extreme hyper-partisan hack you appear. :lol:



Now what about sheehan and code pinks actions during the war?
 
hypocrisy noted..... Your organized groups are ok, but the made up ones in your head are not....

And you want to fight percieved vigilantisism, with more vigilantism and violence? how telling of your character... :lol:


How pathetically an extreme hyper-partisan hack you appear. :lol:



Now what about sheehan and code pinks actions during the war?

Oh I get it. You demand the right to disrupt town hall meetings, and don't want anyone to stop you. You demand the right to spread lies about health care reform, but don't want the White House to respond to those lies. You demand the freedom to be a vigilante and threaten violence, but anyone who tries to stop you is a thug. How telling of your character.
 
Oh I get it. You demand the right to disrupt town hall meetings, and don't want anyone to stop you. You demand the right to spread lies about health care reform, but don't want the White House to respond to those lies. You demand the freedom to be a vigilante and threaten violence, but anyone who tries to stop you is a thug. How telling of your character.



What lie have I spread about health care reform? Please show some integrity....



You supported union thugs attacking other Americans because you don't like what they have to say,.


My character is intact sir. yours not so much.
 
What lie have I spread about health care reform? Please show some integrity....



You supported union thugs attacking other Americans because you don't like what they have to say,.


My character is intact sir. yours not so much.

Please pay attention. You are defending the right to vigilantism. You are defending the right to spread lies. I did not accuse you of doing so personally.
 
Please pay attention. You are defending the right to vigilantism. You are defending the right to spread lies. I did not accuse you of doing so personally.



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kxaGfClPws"]YouTube - Kathy Castor - Healthcare Town Hall Meeting in Tampa - 8/6[/ame]


You support this?

This actual violence against people who are shouting in protest, these fat union thugs you support this actions?
 
YouTube - Kathy Castor - Healthcare Town Hall Meeting in Tampa - 8/6


You support this?

This actual violence against people who are shouting in protest, these fat union thugs you support this actions?

That's a very interesting video, thank you for posting it.
It shows a group of activists disrupting a town hall meeting in Tampa by chanting. They refuse to stop chanting when asked. Finally, they are body-blocked out of the room and the door shut behind them so the town hall meeting can continue.

I did not see any "violence". But yes, I totally support the "fat union thugs" pushing the mob out of the room. You don't? How long should the protestors have been allowed to chant? As long as they want? How does that contribute to the town hall meeting? Do you consider their chanting to be "free speech"?

I think this video and your reaction to it pretty well summarizes your disregard for the democratic process and your hyper-partisan opinion. Again, thank you for posting the video.
 
That's a very interesting video, thank you for posting it.
It shows a group of activists disrupting a town hall meeting in Tampa by chanting. They refuse to stop chanting when asked. Finally, they are body-blocked out of the room and the door shut behind them so the town hall meeting can continue.

I did not see any "violence". But yes, I totally support the "fat union thugs" pushing the mob out of the room. You don't? How long should the protestors have been allowed to chant? As long as they want? How does that contribute to the town hall meeting? Do you consider their chanting to be "free speech"?

I think this video and your reaction to it pretty well summarizes your disregard for the democratic process and your hyper-partisan opinion. Again, thank you for posting the video.




9100_health-care-meeting.jpg




You make excuses for assault noted....
 
How do you figure that people who work for compensation in healthcare aren't legitimately in business, what is your criteria for private versus public since obviously you have a differing opinion than the constitution of the United States. Face it, healthcare is a business.
Bull****, it's a service like anything else.

What you are either failing to recognize or understand is that there is a difference between people working for compensation in healthcare and big companies running the healthcare business seeking to maximize their profits.
They are not the same thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom