- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 94,199
- Reaction score
- 69,434
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
How do you know that warrants and/or court findings were NOT pursued in these cases? You're speculating wildly in lieu of facts.
But, hey, let freedom ring.
Prove that there are warrants. All this talk of putting cameras and surveillance up requires proof itself. The burden of proof is not on me, it's on those wishing to infringe upon the rights of the individual...you. You have to supply the proof. The only way to justly (and it's not always just, it's merely the only way which can yield a just result) infringe upon the rights of the individual is through the courts. Someone being on welfare doesn't qualify, someone being maybe suspicious doesn't qualify. Someone maybe abusing a system/person doesn't qualify. You have to have proof and provide it. Otherwise you're engaging in treason and tyranny against the People.