Re: US says Russia could join NATO (rofl)
When you begin and end your reply ranting about "morons" you have removed yourself from any intelligent debate.
That’s why you are still talking to me?
You are incorrect that "all Obama worshipers bow to authorities". That doesn't even make sense, yet you base your "argument" on it. You also quote one of my "friends" saying something. Make no mistake, I do not seek friends here, and have been as harsh to liberals as to ditto-heads.
Your post is an appeal to authority fallacy, all other posts of yours are infected with all kind of fallacies. Obama worshipers do not submit any other kind of posts.
If you truly want to debate, then confine your language to facts and hypothisis, your insults are not productive and not welcome.
I feign no hypothesis. Your logical fallacies are facts, quoted, pointed to and explained.
While remnants of the Soviet Union still rule Russia, the nation is different, and certainly does not harbor the imperial dreams it did when the world was in fear of Communism.
And whom do you expect to rule Russia, - American experts? The former Soviet citizens rule Russia.
Is Russia any more corrupt than Turkey, Romania, or many other nations which are being welcomed into NATO? I doubt it.
It is a lot less corrupted than Georgia and Ukraine if the comparasion matters, but the professional experts would never say so.
Corruption is of a great matter to ‘’the remnants of the Soviet Union who still rule Russia’’. As the matter of fact it is their main challenge, the problem #1.
The idea of NATO is to band together against aggression.
The idea of NATO was to band together against aggression of the USSR,
the idea of NATO is to band together against aggression of Russia.
If Russia can get its act together enough to refrain from military adventurism against other Western nations, then its entry into NATO would greatly strengthen that organization.
The acts of Russia do not matter, if Russia refrains from military adventurism against other Western nations all the purpose and meaning, the whole idea of NATO pointed above
would be nullified. So whatever Russia does less of disarming and handing its arms to the Western nations it has to be taken as exercising military adventurism against other Western nations, - just for NATO to exist.
The fact itself, that Russia acquires a strong and independent military is the military adventurism of Russia against other Western nations in the view of the hundreds of dedicated professional experts, there is not even one, justone dissenting voice among them. And if one appears it is sent to a mental institution as a birther or a racist or a right wing nut. The unity of the experts is stunning.