- Joined
- Jul 23, 2005
- Messages
- 6,923
- Reaction score
- 1,738
- Location
- Staffs, England
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Who protects Bermuda? Who funds its defense? :doh
exactly defence is pretty much all they do.
Who protects Bermuda? Who funds its defense? :doh
More a general comment. I am sure you all have done something to annoy the government, if just encouraging people to drive on the wrong side of the road.
By the way, driving on what feels the wrong side of the road is worse in a country that likes traffic circles...trust me on that.
Apologies are not the way to diplomatic success. Appeasements don't work either.
exactly defence is pretty much all they do.
That was addressing it and not expanding it.I never claimed to have a specific complaint. I made what I intended as a general comment, which is that we(both the US and Britain) should not sweat petty crap, and I certainly do consider this petty crap. Now if you want to address what I actually saying, without trying to expand it, please do.
It goes both ways. I don't think we should sweat petty crap Britain does that might anger us either.
That was addressing it and not expanding it.
There is a specific gripe (and list of gripes) from the UK against Dear Leader's Administration. You dismiss it as "petty crap" and presumptively declare:
When challenged on said "petty crap"--you bail.
So, we have on Dear Leader's demerit list a string of bumblings towards Great Britain, and on Great Britain's demerit list we have a generic entry of "petty crap."
Dear Leader is punking our allies and kow-towing to our enemies...and you are ok with this?
...that might anger us...
Those four words are important. Argue against what I say, don't go and expand it into something it is not.
Those four words mean squat. I read them the first time and they are as unimpressive now as they were then.
Excuse-making is not something that gets better with age.
True.
You know our home office Dave, you know how we deal with passports with our God forsaken Government.
Do you think if these exiles applied for passport they'd be denied? They'd be let in by the incompetent
They sought terrorist training in Afghanistan.Why should they not have passports, or go anywhere they like?
They sought terrorist training in Afghanistan.What part of INNOCENT marks these men as a threat?
Nope.Shouldn't they be welcomed just for having survived Guantanamo?
Why should they not have passports, or go anywhere they like? What part of INNOCENT marks these men as a threat? Shouldn't they be welcomed just for having survived Guantanamo? Nice avatar, BTW.
They sought terrorist training in Afghanistan.
They sought terrorist training in Afghanistan.
Nope.
Thank you.
Well if they are innocent then i'm sure Americans would love to take them in.
US has more land than UK, one of your states is bigger than the entire UK and protectorates put together. You may take them.
I think it is ridiculous we were not informed that we would soon be protecting potential dangers and in fact US hid the information from UK and made back alley deals knowing full well it needs our permission as we control the defence
Lol
The Government of Bermuda is facing a no confidence vote, the public are against taking in anybody.
They were in Afghanistan as tourists? NOT!!!If they had sought terrorist training, they would not be innocent. Jeez.:doh
I Guess they just wanted them to disapear, and what better place for that then the Bermuda............
They are "former terrorist suspects" because they were judged to be innocent...by the Bush administration. What is your problem with releasing innocent people?
They were in Afghanistan as tourists? NOT!!!
No, they live in China.Uighurs live in Afghanistan.