• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kansas Teacher Claims Conservative Views Led to Loss of Job

Qualifications extend beyond the number of days in a low pressure governor's job. Capability and competence are what is valued in a presidential candidate, and you cannot claim that Palin qualifies for either of these. Fortunately, The Messiah does qualify.

I disagree.
 
If we do go down below 50, can't we bump Puerto Rico or American Samoa up in status -- I mean, so we don't have change all the flags.:confused:

And that island on the Disney Cruise -- that could be a state. I could be governor of Castaway Cay!:mrgreen:
Then you'd have more executive experience than Obama started out with.
 
Fine, run away from a debate. I clarified my position and you can't even comment intelligently on it.

How does not believing Sara Palin was qualified for national office make me a leftist?? Answer the question or admit you don't really know me yet.

You don't want to back up your post point-by-point, then don't open your mouth in the first place. Be a man and have the mods delete it.

Just for the record -- It appears that Truth Detector has ducked out of the thread.

I suggested we go point-by-point on a number of quotes of mine that he claimed proved me left-leaning. I asked several questions concerning the first 'point' he made. He has not answered.

Just goes to show -- Trolls are not always newbies.
 
Just for the record -- It appears that Truth Detector has ducked out of the thread.

I suggested we go point-by-point on a number of quotes of mine that he claimed proved me left-leaning. I asked several questions concerning the first 'point' he made. He has not answered.

Just goes to show -- Trolls are not always newbies.

I think you should simply disregard TD instead of getting dragged down into his ****fests. I made an error yesterday by even engaging him. I would suggest that you not repeat my mistake. Yeah, it's ****ed up to have to see the **** he spews on the screen when you scroll through, but I think if we don't encourage it by giving him any attention at all.
 
Wow.....I don't remember worshiping you.

I was agreeing with/explaining what he was saying. Poster in Question, please feel free to tell me if I interpreted your statement wrong. I can admit I was wrong.

I don't recall wanting to attack you over the internet, so presumably you didn't butcher my meaning or anything.

As for Scarecrow... don't pay attention. He and Celticlord (most vocal in their positions that I've seen) live to Obama-bash, and the latter is far more reasonable-sounding when he does so. In politics, even clocks like S.A. are right half the time, but defending Palin's intelligence and asserting that Letterman's jokes were a media conspiracy is swimming in the deep end of the pool with a bloody nose after piranhas have been released.

I don't like Obama much, and I can think of Democrats and Republicans who would have done his job better (though the latter would have been hampered by the Scarecrows of their party), but he's not the worst thing that ever happened to the country and the hope (if not the change) he brought to the country will be a useful footnote in future elections if he inspires a decent minority of the population to get in shape, eat healthy and stop ripping the Earth limb from limb.

Dang, did I just go off-topic, but then again this thread isn't about a fired teacher anymore anyway.
 
Just for the record -- It appears that Truth Detector has ducked out of the thread.

I suggested we go point-by-point on a number of quotes of mine that he claimed proved me left-leaning. I asked several questions concerning the first 'point' he made. He has not answered.

Just goes to show -- Trolls are not always newbies.

As with most of your uninformed diatribe, you would be wrong; the debate over your proclaimed "conservative" credentials ended when you admitted voting for Obama; one the most naive, unqualified, Socialist President in our history.

Carry on. :2wave:
 
I think you should simply disregard TD instead of getting dragged down into his ****fests. I made an error yesterday by even engaging him. I would suggest that you not repeat my mistake. Yeah, it's ****ed up to have to see the **** he spews on the screen when you scroll through, but I think if we don't encourage it by giving him any attention at all.

What irony watching you spew such inane hypocrisy. Perhaps you should take a vacation from the group think you find yourself in at DP and take in the freash air of REALITY dude.

But by all means, carry on. Your campaign of ignorance is rather entertaining. :cool:
 
As with most of your uninformed diatribe, you would be wrong; the debate over your proclaimed "conservative" credentials ended when you admitted voting for Obama; one the most naive, unqualified, Socialist President in our history.

Carry on. :2wave:

...Conservative is an ideology, not a party. Being a Conservative doesn't imply a Republican vote. Ever heard of a "Blue-Dog Democrat". Probably not. It's a Democrat who has conservative leanings.

What's more, Hazlnut never claimed to be a conservative. He says he is a moderate. Pssst...that means his ideology doesn't have for all intents and purposes its own candidate, so he can vote for who he believes is the most correct. I would more place his ideology a milimeter left of center and that is after reading some of his posts, not based on his voting choices.
 
Last edited:
...Conservative is an ideology, not a party. Being a Conservative doesn't imply a Republican vote. Ever heard of a "Blue-Dog Democrat". Probably not. It's a Democrat who has conservative leanings.

What's more, Hazlnut never claimed to be a conservative. He says he is a moderate. Pssst...that means his ideology doesn't have for all intents and purposes its own candidate, so he can vote for who he believes is the most correct. I would more place his ideology a milimeter left of center and that is after reading some of his posts, not based on his voting choices.

Fair enough.

But since I don't believe I've had the opportunity to post in a thread on the death penalty, immigration, crime and punishment, education, welfare, or a really detailed discussion on economics... I'll ask you to put a pin in that left of center rating...

Ask me about PETA sometime...;)
 
Fair enough.

But since I don't believe I've had the opportunity to post in a thread on the death penalty, immigration, crime and punishment, education, welfare, or a really detailed discussion on economics... I'll ask you to put a pin in that left of center rating...

Ask me about PETA sometime...;)

I would be glad to re-evaluate your rating after I see your opinions on such matters.
 
Just to wrap up this thread, the teacher, Tim Latham, got his job back.

Kansas Teacher With Conservative Views Gets Job Back - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News - FOXNews.com

0_61_latham2_320.jpg
 
As with most of your uninformed diatribe, you would be wrong; the debate over your proclaimed "conservative" credentials ended when you admitted voting for Obama; one the most naive, unqualified, Socialist President in our history.

No doubt he is socialist, but he hasn't topped FDR quite yet IMHO.
 
No doubt he is socialist, but he hasn't topped FDR quite yet IMHO.

Ok, because Obama has just arrived to tear our poor democracy to ribbons with his Socialist Manifesto and only Captain Pain-Killer (aka Rush Limbaugh) can save us from his evil clutches. Mwuahahahahahahahaha.....

Could we be a little more naive please? I don't think I have reached my threshold yet.
 
^^Naive? Naive is you thinking that I must love Rush Limbaugh when in fact I have never listened to any of his shows. Naive is thinking that my claims and fears are baseless. Naive is thinking that Obama is doing his job correctly.
 
^^Naive? Naive is you thinking that I must love Rush Limbaugh when in fact I have never listened to any of his shows. Naive is thinking that my claims and fears are baseless. Naive is thinking that Obama is doing his job correctly.

THE THREAD! IT LIVES!

Seriously, if you want to debate partisan non-issue stuff and Obama in general, there are a dozen other threads you could hack on the front page alone.
 
This was a thread I was subscribed to and I didn't want that guy to end the thread with a false characterization of me.
 
Back
Top Bottom