• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama now actively seeking to control executive salaries

Erod

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
15,483
Reaction score
8,227
Location
North Texas
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Treasury Takes Steps to Rein in Executive Pay - FOXBusiness.com

So now Obama can dictate how much we can make if we rise to the top of our professions. Do we negotiate our salaries in front of Congress?

Funny, how did Obama afford that incredibly expensive home in Chicago from his years as a community organizer and state senator? Who was regulating his pay?

This man really thinks he's been elected king.
 
The link you supplied said nothing about the arguments you are trying to make.

BTW....GWB also said a couple years ago that executive pay should be reigned in and consistent with actual job performance....
 
Although the Fixed News story tries to muddle the facts, this is only bindind on those who recieve money from the government. It's very simple, if you don't want to abide by certain rules, don't take the taxpayers money.
 
Treasury Takes Steps to Rein in Executive Pay - FOXBusiness.com

So now Obama can dictate how much we can make if we rise to the top of our professions. Do we negotiate our salaries in front of Congress?

Funny, how did Obama afford that incredibly expensive home in Chicago from his years as a community organizer and state senator? Who was regulating his pay?

This man really thinks he's been elected king.

Must be nice to be able to jump to conclusions with so little information. I know very little about this story, but I do know it refers to the pay for executives who are receiving taxpayer bailout funds, not private corporations. And what would be your problem with that?
 
Back
Top Bottom