- Joined
- Jul 12, 2005
- Messages
- 36,913
- Reaction score
- 11,283
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
To an extent, yes. But, Tiller is the accused, the burden of proof is on the accusers.
I agree. But the people have the right to put together their case through unobstructed discovery. The discovery process of any case against Tiller is severely hampered by the veto override of a governor who receives campaign funds from Dr. Tiller.
If it looks like a duck...