• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Man accused of killing abortion doc says he's being 'treated like a criminal'

I never said Tiller was found guilty of murder :confused:

Why not just quit using the term murder altogether then ? Oh, thats right, because you want the smear value even though the term does not apply.
 
... and I am not posting it to toot my own horn, but rather to elucidate the source of my ability to execute the aforementioned revision of policy.

:liar

Didn't your Mother teach you to always tell the truth? :naughty
 
Why not just quit using the term murder altogether then ? Oh, thats right, because you want the smear value even though the term does not apply.

.....with all the bravado you like....
 
Why not just quit using the term murder altogether then ? Oh, thats right, because you want the smear value even though the term does not apply.
Why does the term not apply to Tiller?

The guy killed viable babies......sounds like murder to me.
 
Why does the term not apply to Tiller?

The guy killed viable babies......sounds like murder to me.

I think it depends on the circumstances. He did it just when the mother was in serious danger then that is not perhaps murder but I haven't seen anything either way to show when he performed these procedures.
 
Why not just quit using the term murder altogether then ? Oh, thats right, because you want the smear value even though the term does not apply.

Or why not stop swimming in the river denial... :thinking
 
Why does the term not apply to Tiller?

The guy killed viable babies......sounds like murder to me.

What's the name of that terrorist who bombed us and got away with it due to a technicality?

...damn it's late for me...he boasts about it and only regrets that he couldn't do more...**** what is his name...
 
What's the name of that terrorist who bombed us and got away with it due to a technicality?

...damn it's late for me...he boasts about it and only regrets that he couldn't do more...**** what is his name...
You mean that esteemed Professor of Education, as well as confidant and mentor of Dear Leader himself, William Charles Ayres?
 
Last edited:
You mean that esteemed Professor of Education, as well as confidant and mentor of Dear Leader himself, William Charles Ayres?

William Charles Ayres is "not guilty" be the same meashure Tiller is, I think.
 
William Charles Ayres is "not guilty" be the same meashure Tiller is, I think.

Didn't Ayers admit to the bombing, while Tiller has not, and is only slandered by those who are trying to make a political point?
 
Didn't Ayers admit to the bombing, while Tiller has not, and is only slandered by those who are trying to make a political point?

Tiller didn't deny his profession, and neither of the two claim that what they did was 'wrong' ("unethical", for those anti-Christians reading this thread)
 
Tiller didn't deny his profession,

. . .and it was a legal one wasn't it ? Bombing is illegal, right ?

Seems your parallel is a bit askew.
 
Tiller didn't deny his profession, and neither of the two claim that what they did was 'wrong' ("unethical", for those anti-Christians reading this thread)

Tiller never admitted to being a murderer.
 
Tiller never admitted to being a murderer.

I've already said as much.

I mean, come on, you don't go to court time after time, using your loophole to get away with your crime, and then confess :doh
 
I've already said as much.

I mean, come on, you don't go to court time after time, using your loophole to get away with your crime, and then confess :doh

So, never admitted it, never convicted. Sounds to me like he was not provably a murderer, and you are just making an unfounded accusation. It's never good to let your emotions overrule your sense.
 
to get away with your crime,

What Crime ? Oh, I see, now you want to smear him with the word "crime".

This word doesn't apply either, but again we see you using it anyway for the smear value.
 
What Crime?

The anti-late term abortion statutes of the state.

So, never admitted it, never convicted. Sounds to me like he was not provably a murderer, and you are just making an unfounded accusation. It's never good to let your emotions overrule your sense.

Right, just as William Charles Ayres was not convicted due to prosecutorial misconduct (a technicality, fyi).

I can't link you directly to it per forum rules, but talloulou leads the argument in the old Tiller thread around page 50.
 
The anti-late term abortion statutes of the state.



Right, just as William Charles Ayres was not convicted due to prosecutorial misconduct (a technicality, fyi).

I can't link you directly to it per forum rules, but talloulou leads the argument in the old Tiller thread around page 50.


I was part of that discussion, and she did not prove or even offer strong evidence.
 
I was part of that discussion, and she did not prove or even offer strong evidence.

I'm sorry you feel that way, but fact is they both got away with crime due to technicalities.
 
I'm sorry you feel that way, but fact is they both got away with crime due to technicalities.

You should learn the difference between the words "fact" and "opinion" and "accusation". Meanings of words are important.
 
I'm sorry you feel that way, but fact is they both got away with crime due to technicalities.

Can you please cite which Kansas law(s) Tiller was violating?

As far as I know, his abortion procedure was not outlawed.
 
You know, it kind of cracks me up watching people split hairs on Tiller's killer. Some say that he killed a killer. OK, assuming that is true, what about the 2 innocent people at the church who he assaulted? They had absolutely nothing to do with Tiller, but he assaulted them anyway, didn't he?

The guy is a wacko. Period. Let's put him on trial, and THEN give him the death penalty. He should be OK with it. After all, if it is OK with him to deal out "an execution" to Tiller for murders he believes the man committed, then he should have no problem with others executing him for committing murder either. In fact, I think, as the needle is being put in his arm, he should shake the hand of the executioner and say "Thank you".
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom