• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 8

Erod said:
For the record, Obama supports this ruling. But let's ignore that, and get back to bashing the beauty pageant winner!!!
Click to expand...

Wrong....Obama clearly stated that although he personally does not believe in gay marriage, he was against prop 8 and does not believe that Constitutional rights should be put to a simple majority vote.
 
jallman said:
It was something that happened here in the US. A beauty pageant contestant was asked a question about gay marriage by a fat, smelly little faggot who then used her respectful answer to bash her in the media afterward.

It was much ado about nothing.
Click to expand...

...to be honest Jallman...she wasn't "bashed" in the media until she got on her soapbox and started crying martyr. It was her hypocrisy that got her into trouble moreso than her answer (which was rather pathetic to begin with)....
 
disneydude said:
...to be honest Jallman...she wasn't "bashed" in the media until she got on her soapbox and started crying martyr. It was her hypocrisy that got her into trouble moreso than her answer (which was rather pathetic to begin with)....
Click to expand...

Oh yeah, because within 12 hours of the pageant, that jizz stained little troglodyte wasn't already starting his "dumb bitch" smear campaign. :roll:
 
jallman said:
Oh yeah, because within 12 hours of the pageant, that jizz stained little troglodyte wasn't already starting his "dumb bitch" smear campaign. :roll:
Click to expand...


Personally, I didn't see that until she started crying that she lost because of her views. She couldn't accept the fact that she lost the pageant and had to find a scapegoat....but that's a whole other thread.
 
jallman said:
Oh yeah, because within 12 hours of the pageant, that jizz stained little troglodyte wasn't already starting his "dumb bitch" smear campaign. :roll:
Click to expand...

I don't know the full details but the fact she is in a beauty pageant says something to me about her intelligence imho.

But i admit, i hate beauty pageant for what they represent so i am biased.
 
disneydude said:
Personally, I didn't see that until she started crying that she lost because of her views. She couldn't accept the fact that she lost the pageant and had to find a scapegoat....but that's a whole other thread.
Click to expand...

Well it does make one wonder when one of the judges begins smearing her only hours after the pageant...

I think she lost because of her views and the fact that Perez Hilton is a little slimeball who should go die in a fire.
 
jallman said:
It's called a hyperbole and I would have thought one of your supposed mental genius would have recognized that. :doh
Click to expand...

It is hyperbole, and this makes your arguments credible? :doh

jallman said:
And who is shoving anything in your face? Is anyone requiring you, by law to take part in or even attend a gay marriage?
Click to expand...

Activist Gays using their emotional hysterics about perceived rights who are trying re-define what marriage is. You would think that you get this by now.
 
Truth Detector said:
It is hyperbole, and this makes your arguments credible? :doh
Click to expand...

Well I certainly am glad your mental faculties are with you enough to distinguish an actual argument from an off-color cracked as a joke...:roll:

Activist Gays using their emotional hysterics about perceived rights who are trying re-define what marriage is. You would think that you get this by now.
Click to expand...

If your relationship with your wife is being redefined because the homos down the street are now having government sanctioned butt sex, then you probably should take that up with her. You would think that you get this by now.
 
disneydude said:
Wrong....Obama clearly stated that although he personally does not believe in gay marriage, he was against prop 8 and does not believe that Constitutional rights should be put to a simple majority vote.
Click to expand...

In other words, Obama once again attempts to take BOTH sides in an issue and his loyal fans (that would be YOU) willingly swallow the swill he dishes out for no other reason than of him being a Liberal Democrat.

It is so easy to be Liberal, you just have to say that you care. :rofl
 
Truth Detector said:
Activist Gays using their emotional hysterics about perceived rights who are trying re-define what marriage is. You would think that you get this by now.
Click to expand...

I have to admit I agree with you here. Then again I see it from both sides, so what can I say.
 
Goldwaters said:
Whats the matter? Self loathing a big problem for you?
Click to expand...

Oh wow...took you all of 4 posts to throw that one out. That's a record.

Self loathing isn't a problem for me, chuckles. In fact, it's such a small problem for me that I don't feel the need to boost my self esteem by embracing every slimey little faggot that crawls his way out of a bathhouse just because we both happen to like ****. Got it?
 
jallman said:
Oh wow...took you all of 4 posts to throw that one out. That's a record.

Self loathing isn't a problem for me, chuckles. In fact, it's such a small problem for me that I don't feel the need to boost my self esteem by embracing every slimey little faggot that crawls his way out of a bathhouse just because we both happen to like ****. Got it?
Click to expand...

Best line EVER! :lol:
 
jallman said:
Oh wow...took you all of 4 posts to throw that one out. That's a record.

Self loathing isn't a problem for me, chuckles. In fact, it's such a small problem for me that I don't feel the need to boost my self esteem by embracing every slimey little faggot that crawls his way out of a bathhouse just because we both happen to like ****. Got it?
Click to expand...
Dude...take it easy. I was gonna give you some flack, but it sounds like you're ready to blow. That hatred will eat you alive. You need to do whatever you normally do to calm down. I'm sorry for antagonizing you.
 
Blackdog said:
I have to admit I agree with you here. Then again I see it from both sides, so what can I say.
Click to expand...

But you would be mistaken; I do try to see it from BOTH sides as well.

But the BIGGER issue in my opinion is the breakdown of the family unit and moral values that are the glue that holds a family together.

Over time, the erosion of the importance of parents who stay together to nurture and raise children will also erode the society in my opinion and based on studies.

It is much like the issue of morality; even with the threat of eternal damnation, man has shown he is capable of committing horrible atrocities on his fellow man. Imagine a society that doesn't have any moral handicaps that one has with religious morality.
 
Goldwaters said:
Dude...take it easy. I was gonna give you some flack, but it sounds like you're ready to blow. That hatred will eat you alive. You need to do whatever you normally do to calm down. I'm sorry for antagonizing you.
Click to expand...

No, dude, it's not your fault. It's that it is the default answer that most pro-gay activists give me if I happen to disagree with one small piece of their overall agenda. The nastiest comments I ever get come from liberals who think I have some obligation to lockstep with them on every issue just because of who I am ****ing.

My immediate response to the word "self loathing", in particular, is overkill. :2wave:
 
Goldwaters said:
Dude...take it easy. I was gonna give you some flack, but it sounds like you're ready to blow. That hatred will eat you alive. You need to do whatever you normally do to calm down. I'm sorry for antagonizing you.
Click to expand...
You aren't antagonizing him -- he believes that his vulgarity and lack of civility will make up for the rather impressive lack of content in his posts.

Or that it makes him cute. I can't remember which.
 
Truth Detector said:
In other words, Obama once again attempts to take BOTH sides in an issue and his loyal fans (that would be YOU) willingly swallow the swill he dishes out for no other reason than of him being a Liberal Democrat.

It is so easy to be Liberal, you just have to say that you care. :rofl
Click to expand...

Not at all...its called respect for others views. It is possible, believe it or not, to have your own personal views but not feel the need to subject everyone else to them (something that many cannot grasp).
For instance, you can personally believe that Abortion, for example, is wrong and still be pro-choice because you do not believe that you have the right to force others to accept your viewpoint.
You can be anti-gay marriage, but nevertheless be against prop 8 because despite your views, you understand that it is wrong to force that view upon others.
Obama simply understands that his right to his views end when it infringes upon the rights of others. That is a concept that you probably cannot understand.
 
Truth Detector said:
But you would be mistaken; I do try to see it from BOTH sides as well.

But the BIGGER issue in my opinion is the breakdown of the family unit and moral values that are the glue that holds a family together.

Over time, the erosion of the importance of parents who stay together to nurture and raise children will also erode the society in my opinion and based on studies.

It is much like the issue of morality; even with the threat of eternal damnation, man has shown he is capable of committing horrible atrocities on his fellow man. Imagine a society that doesn't have any moral handicaps that one has with religious morality.
Click to expand...

No I meant I see the same kind of rhetoric coming from both sides, not the issue itself as I agree with you from a religious standpoint. I disagree from a secular standpoint, hence my confusion on the issue.
 
Truth Detector said:
It is much like the issue of morality; even with the threat of eternal damnation, man has shown he is capable of committing horrible atrocities on his fellow man. Imagine a society that doesn't have any moral handicaps that one has with religious morality.
Click to expand...

Actually society already is that way considering that there isn't one particular brand of morality that overrules another. Not everyone believes in the idea of eternal damnation. I certainly don't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom