It isn't the "truth" as you've never factually established your argument.
Sure I have. "Eliminate all possibilities that couldn't happen, and whatever is left, no matter how improbable, is the solution", to quote Sherlock Holmes. And I don't actually figure that a black liberal booted out of the Secretary of State position would find his racist tendency to support a "brother" running for president against the record of the man that fired him to be all that big a stretch.
Why do you find it so difficult? Your belief that only whites are racist?
In other words you really had no intelligent response (as evidenced by your litany of intellectual failures thus far) to them so you saw them, you just chose to ignore them out of survival instinct.
That was an intelligent response.
Now explain why you should expect anyone to respond to the endless stream of crap I found under your name.
Now that I have called you out for the type of poster you are, you feel obligated to respond.
Yeah, I missed that post. Can you link me to that post of yours that said "intelilgent, irrefutable, eminently knowledgable, honest, and fearless in the face of liberal mediocrity and mendaciousness" again? I seriously did not see that one.
Right, that's it. It's all about book sales and running for office with Colin Powell.
This is the best of your ability to dissect a sentence and reveal the stated meaning?
Do you truly believe that what I said?
More importantly, do you beleive that's what others will see, reading my post?
I see you are still clutching the "get Powell by any means necessary" since he stood as an influential figure in the U.S. and went against the conservative grain. It'll be okay.
Nope, just pointing out racism, is all.
Powell's basically an irrelevancy and is only being discussed because the media picked up on his ignorant comments. What do his comments prove? That he's an ignorant hack that either doesn't understand the politics of the last decade, or who's whoring himself out in the hopes of getting another government job. Regardless, his comment that the GOP shouldn't move to the right is flat wrong.
And one of understand reason, logic, history, and the difference between an established fact and an ignorant opinion. That one of us is not you.
Yeah, and one of us can type the word "us" so the sentence makes sense.
Also, no one proposing that Powell's support of Obama based on the belief that Obama's inarticulate vision of the future (I guess he doesn't have a "future teleprompter") has the slightest understanding of the currents of history. That one of us is you.
There you go again, the "my way or the highway" argument. You've offered no proof that he's a racist. And I'm a pro-gun Democrat, so "check mate."
You think repeating yourself establishes credence?
Translation: I can't actually provide and intelligent rebuttal, so I'll rely on catcalling. Fine, as you can see, I can play both games at once.
Yes, I've seen that you can't rebut arguments and that you call cats.
So?
And there's the ball game. It just shows you are completely full of ****. It has everything to do with the discussion at hand because it is biggest factor in identifying who Colin Powell is and where most of his politics come from.
See that guys? He says I'm full of stars! Cool!
Oh, is this thread now about Finding Colon Powell, aka "Jiff"...er "Skippy", and figuring out where his misguided politics come from? I thought it was about his getting kicked in the head when he was a wee child....er his incredible political acumen in steering the Republican party down the same path towards serfdom the Democrats are eagerly pursuing, like little babies riding their strollers down a steep San Francisco hill into the cold and deadly bay.
You didn't debate it because you can't. You don't really know anything about the man as evidenced by your brilliant commentary thus far.
The debate isn't about the man. The debate is about the man's racist decision to back Obama for no reason at all.
