• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Conservative radio host gets waterboarded, and lasts six seconds before.....

Jerry said:
Enjoy it? Wtf?
Click to expand...

Is that your explaination?


Jerry wrote"
"I embrace the effects of waterboarding...that's why I support it's employment."

To which I replied"

"Nazi's tortured people to protect the homeland.

And supported the apparent benifits of it's employment."

Then Jerry Responded...

I invoke Godwin's Law.

Two Jewish children are sitting on top of a roof near a chimney. A passer-by asks, 'What are you doing there?'


'We are waiting for our parents.'

Jerry in the context of what was said here by me and the responses by you..

Please elaborate on why you think that response was humurous?


You say that you "embrace the effects of waterboarding and support it's employment."

What effects of waterboarding do you support Jerry?
Why would you support it's employment if it has done nothing but dragged our country through the gutter?

Please post links as to what credible effects that has come about from torturing people that you support Jerry?

Why do you find it to be funny to deflect this idiocy with disgusting comments about Jews being incinerated by the Nazi's?
 
Jerry said:
Enjoy it? Wtf?
Click to expand...

When asked if you have experienced waterboarding you said "I embrace the effects of waterboarding". Your limited reply seems to indicate a positive response to its effects.
 
An easy mark:
goldendog said:
Is that your explaination?


Jerry wrote"
"I embrace the effects of waterboarding...that's why I support it's employment."

To which I replied"

"Nazi's tortured people to protect the homeland.

And supported the apparent benifits of it's employment."

Then Jerry Responded...

I invoke Godwin's Law.

Two Jewish children are sitting on top of a roof near a chimney. A passer-by asks, 'What are you doing there?'


'We are waiting for our parents.'

Jerry in the context of what was said here by me and the responses by you..

Please elaborate on why you think that response was humurous?


You say that you "embrace the effects of waterboarding and support it's employment."

What effects of waterboarding do you support Jerry?
Why would you support it's employment if it has done nothing but dragged our country through the gutter?

Please post links as to what credible effects that has come about from torturing people that you support Jerry?

Why do you find it to be funny to deflect this idiocy with disgusting comments about Jews being incinerated by the Nazi's?
Click to expand...

Waterboarding may be torture, but it's not genocide.

Oh, and I don't support waterboarding because I think it's enjoyable. I have no idea where you even came up with that nonsense.

Waterboarding causes suffering, and that's why I support it's use. I want terrorists to suffer. I am willing to inflict whatever suffering is necessary upon them to get the information. They are the one's who ****ed up by acting against America, so don't come crying to me when we have to use force to correct or prevent their mistake.
 
Jerry said:
An easy mark:


Waterboarding may be torture, but it's not genocide.

Oh, and I don't support waterboarding because I think it's enjoyable. I have no idea where you even came up with that nonsense.

Waterboarding causes suffering, and that's why I support it's use. I want terrorists to suffer. I am willing to inflict whatever suffering is necessary upon them to get the information. They are the one's who ****ed up by acting against America, so don't come crying to me when we have to use force to correct or prevent their mistake.
Click to expand...

So you are of the belief that only three were tortured?

And you believe that "All" that were scooped up and tortured were "terrorists"? Please prove this?

I'm still waiting for the links if the proven effects of torturing people that you embrace?

Are you sure that you are not just denying the reality of this mess?

Nazi's tortured people to protect the homeland,NOT REFERRING TO INCINERATING JEWS...Cheney tortured people to gain false confessions to support his Saddam/9-11 dream which never existed.

which is worse?
 
Last edited:
goldendog said:
So you are of the beleif that only three were tortured?

And you beleive that "All" that were scooped up and tortured were "terrorists"? Please prove this?

I'm still waiting for the links if the proven effects of torturing people that you embrace?

Are you sure that you are not just denying the reality of this mess?

Nazi's tortured people to protect the homeland,NOT REFERRING TO INCINERATING JEWS...Cheney tortured people to gain false confessions to support his Saddam/9-11 dream which never existed.

which is worse?
Click to expand...

Firstly, the word is spelled "belief".
Secondly, he didnt say that only three were tortured or that they were or werent all terrorist. Only that he believed terrorist should be. You support your argument by putting words in his mouth. Pathetic.

You are a fool. No cares what Cheney did. 9/11 had to be punished. End of story and when this all happened i bet you thought it was great. But now you realize that America ****ed up and you have to blame someone so why not Cheney and poor Jerry.
 
goldendog said:
No it wasn't funny in the least..it was just a dolt answer put forth when he was confronted with having the mentality of a torture condoning Nazi.

The response was lame and not funny in the least.
Click to expand...

Everyone has a different sense of humor. Lighten up.
 
goldendog said:
So you are of the belief that only three were tortured?

And you believe that "All" that were scooped up and tortured were "terrorists"? Please prove this?

I'm still waiting for the links if the proven effects of torturing people that you embrace?

Are you sure that you are not just denying the reality of this mess?

Nazi's tortured people to protect the homeland,NOT REFERRING TO INCINERATING JEWS...Cheney tortured people to gain false confessions to support his Saddam/9-11 dream which never existed.

which is worse?
Click to expand...





Do you always make it up as you go along? :lol:
 
goldendog said:
So you are of the beleif that only three were tortured?
Click to expand...

I never was under that assumption.

I *believe* that there are several people who were waterboarded, I *believe* that Dick used the 3 examples he could safely expose to the media without compromising national security.

goldendog said:
And you beleive that "All" that were scooped up and tortured were "terrorists"?
Click to expand...

Probably not all, as it turned out, but they're fine so no big deal.

goldendog said:
Please prove this?
Click to expand...

Prove what?

goldendog said:
I'm still waiting for the links if the proven effects of torturing people that you embrace?
Click to expand...

Those links are on this thread somewhere, you want them, go find them, not my job.

goldendog said:
Are you sure that you are not just denying the reality of this mess?
Click to expand...

Sir if anything I'm the only one embracing the reality of this mess.

Some things need to stay in the underground because we can't bear to see them yet we can't exist without them. 'The left' had to go digging, and I guess I don't really fault them for that, but they found something we must have to survive yet can't look at.

So, let's take some public officials and make examples of them, placate the public by passing anti-waterboarding laws which don't apply on your illegal prisons where waterboarding will continue anyway, and move on to some stupid social issue like gay-marriage.

goldendog said:
Nazi's tortured people to protect the homeland,NOT REFERRING TO INCINERATING JEWS...Cheney tortured people to gain false confessions to support his Saddam/9-11 dream which never existed.

which is worse?
Click to expand...

Don't think for a second that Obama is denouncing procedures smiler in intent and suffering inflicted just because he's forced to denounce this one single procedure.

Obama =/= Hitler, so I'm not paying attention to your sophistry.
 
goldendog said:
What was "made up"?.....
Click to expand...





So you are of the belief that only three were tortured?
And you believe that "All" that were scooped up and tortured were "terrorists"? Please prove this?

I'm still waiting for the links if the proven effects of torturing people that you embrace?

Are you sure that you are not just denying the reality of this mess?

Nazi's tortured people to protect the homeland,NOT REFERRING TO INCINERATING JEWS...Cheney tortured people to gain false confessions to support his Saddam/9-11 dream which never existed.

which is worse
Click to expand...


for starters.
 
Maxientius said:
You and your whole family deserved to be raped by wild bears like the whores yo are then shoved in acid.
Nah, im just joking. It's my sense of humor lighten up.

See why your point fails or need i continue?
Click to expand...

:rofl That actually made me spit my soda out.

Thanks for the lolz
 
WillRockwell said:
When asked if you have experienced waterboarding you said "I embrace the effects of waterboarding". Your limited reply seems to indicate a positive response to its effects.
Click to expand...

Because people only embrace what feels good, right?
 
Maxientius said:
:shock: :shock: :shock:

....actually i guess that was kinda funny in a really sick way and now i'll feel horrible if that really happens......well...;)
Click to expand...

Well, if it does actually happen I'll be coming to you for predictions on lotto numbers.

However, I'll look elsewhere for holocaust jokes. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Jerry said:
Because people only embrace what feels good, right?
Click to expand...

The only part of your opinion that is not evasive is your belief that torture should be used against certain individuals. However, the United States has signed international agreements that it would not torture, so if we intend to continue to torture, the US should withdraw from those agreements and state its new position clearly.
 
WillRockwell said:
The only part of your opinion that is not evasive is your belief that torture should be used against certain individuals. However, the United States has signed international agreements that it would not torture, so if we intend to continue to torture, the US should withdraw from those agreements and state its new position clearly.
Click to expand...

Why? So they can be critized?
 
I don't understand what the big problem is here with understanding my position.

I have a couple good friends through work who were in Viatnam. It seems that the gooks liked to give children hand grenades, have them calmly walk over to soljers with a smile on their face and *BOOM* a half dozen more bodies for the anti-war media to cry over.

So soljers had to start shooting children who aproached their positions, and this ****ed them up in the head, gave them nighmares for life, many even commited suicide.

A convoy will be traveling down a road, and gooks would send their own children to stand in the middle of the road to stop the convoy and enable the ambush.

So soldiers began running over these children to protect the convoy. They didn't veer towards the children, they simply......didn't stop.

And you want to put waterboarding my face? Waterboarding? Are you ****ing insane?

War is ugly. The public doesn't want to see it outside Hollywood. We're repulse by it and that only evidences our humanity.

But at the same time, we can't stop the convoy, we can't let the children near our position, we can't just sit on someone who knows wft is going to happen.

War sucks.
 
Jerry said:
I don't understand what the big problem is here with understanding my position.

I have a couple good friends through work who were in Viatnam. It seems that the gooks liked to give children hand grenades, have them calmly walk over to soljers with a smile on their face and *BOOM* a half dozen more bodies for the anti-war media to cry over.

So soljers had to start shooting children who aproached their positions, and this ****ed them up in the head, gave them nighmares for life, many even commited suicide.

A convoy will be traveling down a road, and gooks would send their own children to stand in the middle of the road to stop the convoy and enable the ambush.

So soldiers began running over these children to protect the convoy. They didn't veer towards the children, they simply......didn't stop.

And you want to put waterboarding my face? Waterboarding? Are you ****ing insane?

War is ugly. The public doesn't want to see it outside Hollywood. We're repulse by it and that only evidences our humanity.

But at the same time, we can't stop the convoy, we can't let the children near our position, we can't just sit on someone who knows wft is going to happen.

War sucks.
Click to expand...

Your argument is somewhat weakened by the fact that you've never been in a war. But a good argument.
 
Maxientius said:
You and your whole family deserved to be raped by wild bears like the whores you are then shoved in acid.
Nah, im just joking. It's my sense of humor lighten up.

See why your point fails or need i continue?
Click to expand...

Your sense of humor sucks....no you need not continue..you need to go back to elementary school and reeducate yourself.

If you think that making comments like that about my family is part of a civil discussion then you have obvious mental problems....seek help.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom