- Joined
- Jul 23, 2005
- Messages
- 6,923
- Reaction score
- 1,738
- Location
- Staffs, England
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
The better term is "enemy". Because wars do not concern themselves with guilt or innocence, that being a matter for civillian courts in peacetime. Rather soldiers and patriots are concerned with national survival and the protection of the kids at home.
Since the illegal enemy combatants are found on battlefields bearing arms against American troops, since those darling little people can't get the nations they claim to be from to acknowledge them and claim them, they're stateless enemy combatants and what the hell is a nation fighting a war against an amorphous multinational internationally nonspecific cowardly enemy supposed to do with the flotsam picked up on the battlefield?
Personally, I'm all for questioning them until they're drained dry and then feeding them to the pigs.
I haven't forgotten what those people did on September 11, 2001, and will never forget and never forgive the people involved.
What's wrong with you?
Your aparently missing the fact that alot of those detained are, most likely, not terroists (or enemy combatants for that matter), I refer to my previous post. Whats wrong with me? Basically I object when innocent people are detained and tortured, I guess Im just moraly bankrupt.
Last edited: