• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

President Obama at Notre Dame protest

You obviously are upset over my 1st amendment rights of saying it is disrespectful.

Saying someone SHOULDN'T protest is not the same as saying the SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED to protest.

So, they're allowed to protest, but you're all in a tizzy because they DID protest. Ooooooookay.

Honestly, you can say anything you feel compelled to say. Doesn't bother me one bit. I needed the chuckle.
 
So, they're allowed to protest, but you're all in a tizzy because they DID protest. Ooooooookay.

Yes, that is my 1st amendment right to be. Or are you saying I should be FORCED not to have an opinion?

Honestly, you can say anything you feel compelled to say. Doesn't bother me one bit. I needed the chuckle.

In other words, you were wrong, got it. You accused me of being against the 1st amendment, I am not.
 
Read me last comment above, and in case your drink consumption has been too much I will repeat it.

Saying they SHOULDN'T protest is not the same as saying they SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED to protest.

I think they should have CHOSEN not to protest on graduation. That isn't against any 1st amendment rights.

It's not your 1st amendment rights we're discussing, unless you happened to be at Notre Dame recently. It's the protester's rights, you know, the ones you'd like to curtail because some kids worked hard?

If the best way you have to argue your point is to accuse me of being drunk, then you've already lost. You just don't know it yet.
 
Yes, that is my 1st amendment right to be. Or are you saying I should be FORCED not to have an opinion?



In other words, you were wrong, got it. You accused me of being against the 1st amendment, I am not.

I wasn't wrong in the least. You can have all the opinions you like. It's quite amusing to see you flail about.
 
I wasn't wrong in the least. You can have all the opinions you like. It's quite amusing to see you flail about.

You claimed I was against the 1st amendment rights, I wasn't, therefore you are wrong.

Nowhere did I say they shouldn't be allowed to protest.
 
You claimed I was against the 1st amendment rights, I wasn't, therefore you are wrong.

Nowhere did I say they shouldn't be allowed to protest.

Whatever. You tried to play the old shaming them into silence game by claiming they have a right to protest, but they should have done it some other time/place/way/blah blah blah. Pathetic.
 
Whatever. You tried to play the old shaming them into silence game by claiming they have a right to protest, but they should have done it some other time/place/way/blah blah blah. Pathetic.

Again I exercised my 1st amendment right in saying it was shameful. You didn't like it, boo hoo. Cry me a river.

You still were wrong in claiming I was against the 1st amendment. Way to man up and admit you were wrong, not.
 
Again I exercised my 1st amendment right in saying it was shameful. You didn't like it, boo hoo. Cry me a river.

You still were wrong in claiming I was against the 1st amendment. Way to man up and admit you were wrong, not.

Well, that would be because I wasn't wrong. Like I've said a couple times already, feel free to say whatever you want. It's great entertainment!
 
Well, that would be because I wasn't wrong. Like I've said a couple times already, feel free to say whatever you want. It's great entertainment!

You said I was against the 1st amendment, you are wrong. NOWHERE did I say they don't have the RIGHT to protest.

Again you were wrong.
 
You said I was against the 1st amendment, you are wrong. NOWHERE did I say they don't have the RIGHT to protest.

Again you were wrong.

Sorry, but no. You didn't want them to protest, and used the graduation as a flimsy excuse why. For someone who claims to be such an ardent supporter of the 1st amendment, you sure seem willing to put some odd limitations in its application.
 
Sorry, but no. You didn't want them to protest, and used the graduation as a flimsy excuse why. For someone who claims to be such an ardent supporter of the 1st amendment, you sure seem willing to put some odd limitations in its application.

Wanting them not to protest and saying they don't have the right to are two separate things. I am exercising my 1st amendments rights saying they should have chosen not to.

Well either way, your trolling is at an end, unless you or someone else has something relevant to say, you may have the last word. I'm done, there, have your last word trolling.
 
These people trespassed and caused damage?

To the reputation of the Catholic Church.

Not to mention the children who were dressed up in garbage bags. What kind of parent would ever allow that?
 
They can protest when they like. You don't get to decide.

It's not when--it's where. They can't trespass on private property. They shouldn't be allowed to dress children up in garbage bags and have some goof in an Obama mask chase them around.

They're not only hurting the image of the Catholic Church, they're making the pro-life movement look like a bunch of crazy zealots.

Which other group uses their kids in this capacity? Oh yeah, the Westboro Baptists Church...
 
Me neither--trust me.

I just found the Political Cartoons at the Lincoln Mesuem very telling about another period in our history when the country was divided along political lines.

So, don't forget the last 8 years, just check the museum in Springfield if you're out that way.:) Interesting stuff.

What do you mean was? Last time I check we still are, please enlighten me how the country is somehow united under Obama.
 
It's not when--it's where. They can't trespass on private property.

TNE was speaking specifically of when the protest occurred, not where.

They shouldn't be allowed to dress children up in garbage bags and have some goof in an Obama mask chase them around.

Why not? Didn't look like anyone was being hurt.

They're not only hurting the image of the Catholic Church, they're making the pro-life movement look like a bunch of crazy zealots.

Were they there representing the Catholic Church? It didn't appear so to me, so how are they hurting the image of the church?

Which other group uses their kids in this capacity? Oh yeah, the Westboro Baptists Church...

You're joking, right? You need to watch some videos on protests by left-leaning groups sometime. They use children as props all the time.
 
TNE was speaking specifically of when the protest occurred, not where.

WRONG, I didn't want the protest at the college during graduation.

Don't put words in my mouth.

Since the protesters were at the college that was common sense.
 
WRONG, I didn't want the protest at the college during graduation.

Don't put words in my mouth.

Since the protesters were at the college that was common sense.

During graduation would be "when".

And I thought you left this thread???
 
During graduation would be "when".

And I thought you left this thread???

I said unless you or someone else has something RELEVANT to say. Learn to read. Your accusation was relevant to me.

I was talking about protests at the college. But common sense eludes you I see. Why would I care what happense ELSEWHERE other than the college at their graduation?

Play on words is all you got, sad.
 
Last edited:
To the reputation of the Catholic Church.

Not to mention the children who were dressed up in garbage bags. What kind of parent would ever allow that?

Garbage bags? When I was a kid, we dreamed of having enough money to afford garbage bags to dress up in...
 
They are protesting the graduation ceremony because it included Obama. Hence, they are protesting the graduation because the ceremony is part of that.
And since the graduation is a part of the college education, you are upset because Catholics are protesting other Catholics getting edumacated.

Yeah, that makes so much more sense than them protesting the presence of an abortion aficionado at a Catholic graduation exercise.:roll:
 
They can protest BEFORE, they can protest AFTER all they want and not be disrespectful. However, they CHOOSE to be selfish and do it on the graduation for OTHERS.

I said unless you or someone else has something RELEVANT to say. Learn to read. Your accusation was relevant to me.

I was talking about protests at the college. But common sense eludes you I see. Why would I care what happense ELSEWHERE other than the college at their graduation?

Play on words is all you got, sad.

You clearly said they could protest before or after the graduation. That is a time reference, and therefore it's a "when". Care to comment on that?

And really, you should read your own posts before telling someone else to learn to read. Just some friendly advice.
 
To the reputation of the Catholic Church.
How does a group of Catholics protesting the presence of the abortion aficionado Dear Leader at a Catholic graduation ceremony, when the Catholic Church deems abortion a mortal sin, damage the reputation of the Catholic Church?

Seems to me that damage was done when Dear Leader set foot on the campus.
 
Garbage bags? When I was a kid, we dreamed of having enough money to afford garbage bags to dress up in...

Oh yeah? When I was a kid we ate dirt, and we were happy to have it!!


:mrgreen:
 
And since the graduation is a part of the college education, you are upset because Catholics are protesting other Catholics getting edumacated.

Yeah, that makes so much more sense than them protesting the presence of an abortion aficionado at a Catholic graduation exercise.:roll:

Because Graduation isn't about those that at the college, it is about the students.
 
Back
Top Bottom