Re: U.S. soldiers encouraged to spread message of their Christian faith in Afghanista
That drivel you crapped out is in no way a primer for discussion. I really could give 2 ****s if all you neocons .........
The truth is that NeoCons can be dangerous without wisdom being the guide. And the fact is that their global views can be just as dangerous as the Global Left's. But the meaning of "NeoCon" continues to confuse you.
- "New" conservatives initially approached NeoConservatism from the political left. The forerunners of neoconservatism were often
liberals or
socialists who strongly supported the Allied cause in World War II, and who were influenced by the Great Depression-era ideas of the New Deal.
- During the Carter years the "NeoCons" became disenfranchised with the Democratic Party, which was reflecting less and less upon the "liberal" idea. They saw Reagan as their champion and became Republicans.
- During the first presidential campaign in the post-Cold War, Clinton made attempts to bring the NeoCon back into the fold by promising to re-define America's role in the world. Riding the backs of the worn out underfunded and undertrained military from one crisis to the next (Haiti, Bosnia, Kosovo), the NeoCons saw this vision emerging. And even though they continued to criticize Clinton for continuing the UN/Cold War-esque mission of containing Hussein rather than disposing of him, they were generally pleased with the attempt to establish a new global influencing path for America's power.
Individuals like Wolfewitz and Rumsfeld applauded the mission to contain Hussein rather than behave as we preach in the 90's. They broke from the NeoCon agenda and behaved more along the lines of your kind of people. But by the end, Clinton was doing everything possible to get rid of Hussein while men like Rumsfeld clung to Party slavery and criticized the UN mission as if Clinton began it and they didn't initially support it.
You continue to define things as if history began the moment American troops crossed the Iraqi border and accuse anybody who doesn't place the Bush administration on complete and utter continual blast, no matter the circumstance, of being a
dirty "NeoCon." I still think you haven't an idea of what you are talking about with these matters. And this is what happens when one follows a political party blindly, criticizes the other relentlessly, and views the media as being all knowing and wise.
And by the way...if you could give "2 ****s" for what "
all you NeoCons" say...then why the hell are you even here?
Cease the personal attacks and the responses to personal attacks. Being a vigilante will get you no leeway, but it may get you thread banned. Some folks have already received infractions. Enough, people.
