• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Despite Reports, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Was Not Waterboarded 183 Times

That is exactly the case we are debating here; what is it about Sheikh Khalid Mohammed's admissions you do not comprehend? Was it where he clearly stated he is a terrorist and would like to see even more of our citizens killed?
That's great if he is a terrorist. Now what situation arose that could ONLY be solved by the torture of him?


So you "perceive" that the numerous debates and internal memos of the Bush Administration was not a thoughtful effort to deliberate the ramifications of using these harsh methods on KNOWN ADMITTED terrorists?

I am sorry, but you are forcing one to prescribe to the willing suspension of disbelief if those are your arguments.
I am sure a debate occurred. I just believe the act of torture was easily accepted. It was more likely a "how do we pursued the acceptance of torture" then "is there anything we can do to avoid torture".

I have addressed every one of your points and reiterated them to be sure I understood them correctly.

What is fascinating is your own denial regarding your own positions on this topic, the FACTS surrounding them and your feigned morality.

I have done nothing here but attempt to understand and comprehend the points you are so desperately trying to assert.

Let me know where I said anything about Bush's "morality" or "hatred of Arabs", as you allude to below...
The notion that Bush is an immoral person therefore made immoral decisions because he hates Arabs is beyond absurd. But that is basically the idiotic argument Democrats are asserting here.
 
Who busted Sheikh Khalids knee caps? Where was this in the memos regarding harsh interrogating techniques?

I am trying to deal with the relevant thread topic, not imagined events that never occurred.

Sorry for the confusion; if you are just fabricating events or issues for the sake of wandering off the topic, I will let you go.

I confused your arguments for attempting to be relevant to the thread topic and dealing with REALITY.

Please try to stay on top of the discussions if you choose to join in. Go back a few pages and read the exchange of hypothetical's that MrVicchio presented that my response was directed at.

If you don't like hypothetical's then don't try to participate in the exchange.
 
Last edited:
That's great if he is a terrorist. Now what situation arose that could ONLY be solved by the torture of him?
A second high jacking and attack against LA was stopped for starters.

I suppose you think it would have been better for the attacks to go off and people die then to have water boarded this terrorist.
 
Back
Top Bottom