• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans push nuclear energy to lower costs

In less than 50 years, this debate will be pointless, as fusion power enters center stage. The first step in development is the creation of a tokomak, which is the magnetic field that is able to hold the hydrogen. We are almost there on that.

Until fusion becomes a reality, we can live with controlled fission power. Sure, there will be dangerous byproducts, but that is just temporary. Today's nuclear power will blend perfectly with solar and wind power.
 
obvious Child said:
Virtually none of it environmental.



Which it never does as history shows.



Perhaps, but the private sector has long disagreed with your bullish attitude on nuclear.
Click to expand...
Why would anyone in their right mind invest in nuclear when the rules could change every time the Congress or the President does?

.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom