Harry Guerrilla
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 28,951
- Reaction score
- 12,422
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
1) No, you didn't read what I posted. They are not condemned because of what they say, but because of the consequences of what they say (threatening the public order by rehabilitating the nazis and inciting hatred towards Jews)
_______________________________________________________________
2) Read the trial and answer their arguments!
Show me that it is not a "serious threat to public order"!
Show me that it is not "incompatible with democracy and human rights"!
Show me that "two legitimate aims: "the prevention of disorder or crime" and "the protection of the reputation or rights of others"" are not legitimate aims!
_______________________________________________________
3) Oh, and it's funny to see that when a human right is (thought to be) not respected abroad (in this case in Europe), everyone says it is bad, but when the same human rights (...the right not to be tortured) is violated in the USA, everyone seems to think that it is necessary!!
All that this tells me again is that he hurt a bunch of peoples feelings saying crap that isn't true.
I may not agree with what he has to say but I'll defend his right to say it.
Why you may ask, because the freedom of speech is more important than hurt feelings.