• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Thousands of Anti-Tax 'Tea Party' Protesters Turn Out in U.S. Cities

That sounds like an utter fabrication. I can't imagine there are too many people who wish to legalize pedophilia... but maybe I'm just naive.

It's not. They want us to accept people who mutilate their genitalia as the opposite sex. They want to legalize pedophilia. They want to legalize polygamy and/or eliminate the concept of marriage altogether.

Again, it is a minority but it is real.
 
That sounds like an utter fabrication. I can't imagine there are too many people who wish to legalize pedophilia... but maybe I'm just naive.

I've never thought of the "homosexual agenda" as one that wants to legalize pedophilia, either. I think that's strictly those NAMBLA *&^holes.

I think of it as things like gay marriage, AIDs funding, etc.
 
That sounds like an utter fabrication. I can't imagine there are too many people who wish to legalize pedophilia... but maybe I'm just naive.

There aren't many. But there are some loud ones.

[ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAMBLA]North American Man/Boy Love Association - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]
 
I've never thought of the "homosexual agenda" as one that wants to legalize pedophilia, either. I think that's strictly those NAMBLA *&^holes.

I think of it as things like gay marriage, AIDs funding, etc.

The guys in NAMBLA are the same ones who want to do what I mentioned above.
 
It's not. They want us to accept people who mutilate their genitalia as the opposite sex. They want to legalize pedophilia. They want to legalize polygamy and/or eliminate the concept of marriage altogether.

Again, it is a minority but it is real.
Why even worry about it then? Seems like a non-issue if they have no following.
 

So you are wanting to imprison people on the THOUGHT of having sex with other boys?

I am NO WAY supportive of their charter, but THINKING about having sex with boys is not illegal, doing it is.

If any of these sick ****s do it, then shoot them. However, thinking about it is not illegal.

There are conservatives that love the thought of killing blacks, muslims, and jews. Should we make THINKING about that illegal as well?
 
Why even worry about it then? Seems like a non-issue if they have no following.

I'm not really worried about it, I'm just explaining it since you didn't know what the term meant.
 
So you are wanting to imprison people on the THOUGHT of having sex with other boys?

I am NO WAY supportive of their charter, but THINKING about having sex with boys is not illegal, doing it is.

If any of these sick ****s do it, then shoot them. However, thinking about it is not illegal.

There are conservatives that love the thought of killing blacks, muslims, and jews. Should we make THINKING about that illegal as well?

Where do you get this crap?
 
So you are wanting to imprison people on the THOUGHT of having sex with other boys?
Who said that?

I am NO WAY supportive of their charter, but THINKING about having sex with boys is not illegal, doing it is.

If any of these sick ****s do it, then shoot them. However, thinking about it is not illegal.

There are conservatives that love the thought of killing blacks, muslims, and jews. Should we make THINKING about that illegal as well?
:doh:doh:doh:doh:doh
 
So you are ok with people THINKING about having sex with other boys? At least it being legal and all correct?

Making thoughts illegal makes no sense. I'm referring to legalizing pedophilic relationships. Can you really not figure that out on your own?
 
Last edited:
Where did I say that?

So you are not ok with them (legally that is) having thoughts of having sex with boys. Please make up your mind.

Either it is ok with them LEGALLY thinking about having sex with boys or it isn't, would you please answer that one?
 
Who has said anything to the contrary? :shock:

Bulletwound is obviously having a problem with answering this question.

Is it LEGAL for them to think about having sex with other boys and are you ok with that being legal for them?
 
So you are not ok with them (legally that is) having thoughts of having sex with boys. Please make up your mind.

Either it is ok with them LEGALLY thinking about having sex with boys or it isn't, would you please answer that one?

I just edited my last post. But no, I'm not "okay with it." However I accept that thoughts cannot be made illegal and neither can political speech.

What does this have to do with the tea parties again?
 
I just edited my last post. But no, I'm not "okay with it." However I accept that thoughts cannot be made illegal and neither can political speech.

Fair enough.
 
So you are wanting to imprison people on the THOUGHT of having sex with other boys?

I am NO WAY supportive of their charter, but THINKING about having sex with boys is not illegal, doing it is.

If any of these sick ****s do it, then shoot them. However, thinking about it is not illegal.

There are conservatives that love the thought of killing blacks, muslims, and jews. Should we make THINKING about that illegal as well?

Yeah, dude. That is EXACTLY what I said by posting a link to a Wikipedia article. You got me. :roll:
 
No Taxation without Competent Representation

We have our chance to throw the incompetent incumbent bumbs out of office on Tuesday Nov. 2, 2010.

Wake up America before you wake up in the Socialist Republic of America!
 
So you are ok with people THINKING about having sex with other boys? At least it being legal and all correct?

Are you implying we have thought police and thought crimes?

BTW isn't this a thread about the Tea Parties?

I just read some of the conversation leading up to this. Sorry, I jumped into this conversation like I was trying to jump into a car going 90 miles an hour.
 
Last edited:
No Taxation without Competent Representation

This is America.
You'll never have competent representation. Should be glad that you even have any representation.

We have our chance to throw the incompetent incumbent bumbs out of office on Tuesday Nov. 2, 2010.
Yeeee Haw!!! Replace on incompetent with another. The real brains aren't in D.C., as they are too smart to realize people will spit on them as soon as they play Politician.

Wake up America before you wake up in the Socialist Republic of America!
[/quote]


SRA, that's pretty lame abbreviation.
 
Double entendre here. LOL.

philly.jpg
 
The point being you are only for the freedom of speech when you agree with it.

No, no, no.
I believe freedom of speech is valuable.
I think letting Libs speak is insightful for those who weren't socialists and find it unbelievable somebody could actually believe their clap trap... plus it's entertaining. I still get kicks listening to folks who should be calling themselves Komrades.

If burning flags is their thing, and it is... then let them show their love of country and patriotism that way... LOL... let their speech define who they are and who they support.

I encourage Libs to speak... open and often.

I wish Obama would have gone little further than "yes we can", "now is the time", "we are the ones we have been waiting for", Hope, Change and Unite.

He had so much opportunity and said so little.

He did provide enough to give us insight to the Reign of Error through remarks that he thought weren't recorded or through his wife, friends and mentors... but let's face it... he wasn't open, honest, forthcoming about who he is and was, who his radical friends were, and how he wanted to roll this country.

He had ample opportunity, but we got barely a taste of the sacred water... now we've been given fire hoses and told to open our yaps and enjoy the full force of his Eurosocialist hydrant.

You know, like when he spoke about "bitter clingers", or with Joe and "spread the wealth around", or "57 states" or "I'd never throw Jeremiah under the bus... he's family", or "Granny was a latent racist" or "no preconditions" or "let's make the military take care of their own insurance" and the like... it would have been nice for him to extrapolate just a little on his Grand Schemes to remake America... with a "K".

So much opportunity to speak freely about his grand schemes, and he chose not to and the AMMP (Lib Media) never pushed him.
I wonder why?

.
 
Last edited:
No, no, no.
I believe freedom of speech is valuable.
I think letting Libs speak is insightful for those who weren't socialists and find it unbelievable somebody could actually believe their clap trap... plus it's entertaining. I still get kicks listening to folks who should be calling themselves Komrades.

If burning flags is their thing, and it is... then let them show their love of country and patriotism that way... LOL... let their speech define who they are and who they support.

I encourage Libs to speak... open and often.

I wish Obama would have gone little further than "yes we can", "now is the time", "we are the ones we have been waiting for", Hope, Change and Unite.

He had so much opportunity and said so little.

He did provide enough to give us insight to the Reign of Error through remarks that he thought weren't recorded or through his wife, friends and mentors... but let's face it... he wasn't open, honest, forthcoming about who he is and was, who his radical friends were, and how he wanted to roll this country.

He had ample opportunity, but we got barely a taste of the sacred water... now we've been given fire hoses and told to open our yaps and enjoy the full force of his Eurosocialist hydrant.

You know, like when he spoke about "bitter clingers", or with Joe and "spread the wealth around", or "57 states" or "I'd never throw Jeremiah under the bus... he's family", or "Granny was a latent racist" or "no preconditions" or "let's make the military take care of their own insurance" and the like... it would have been nice for him to extrapolate just a little on his Grand Schemes to remake America... with a "K".

So much opportunity to speak freely about his grand schemes, and he chose not to and the AMMP (Lib Media) never pushed him.
I wonder why?

.

Very well stated. Let me remind you about a guy called "W", who stood on the same potusium and crapped all over America when he had the chance to do, and say, something meaningful. I couldn`t stay away from the local"tea party",yesterday, and was entertained by the signs. My favorite was "DUMB (BUSH)...and DUMBER (OBAMA:2wave:)".
 
Very well stated. Let me remind you about a guy called "W", who stood on the same potusium and crapped all over America when he had the chance to do, and say, something meaningful. I couldn`t stay away from the local"tea party",yesterday, and was entertained by the signs. My favorite was "DUMB (BUSH)...and DUMBER (OBAMA:2wave:)".

Bush was open about who he was and what he wanted to do.

I thought one of his most gutsy responses, though he wouldn't see it that way, was his response to the the greatest philosopher in his life question... he said Jesus Christ... because he changed my heart/soul.

I'm not very religious, used to be fervently hostile to it, but believed this was a shining moment... because too many would have hedged the answer to please people who are hostile or borderline intolerant to religion.

He, as the press noted when he left, was a gracious, honest man.
I believe it is that more than anything that what won him the 2000 election.

He blew it on the spending side, he tried to get along... but he was so strong where we needed him to be strong. Protecting the nation and its citizens.

It was obvious his ability to take a political beating came from a conviction that poll numbers had no meaning when it came to national security, and we were lucky to have him at that moment. He took a beating, and he really didn't fight the press, ... instead he kept his chin up, eyes forward and never forget it wasn't about him... it was about America, our security and protecting the American way of life.

For that he's got my deepest respect and admiration... and thanks.

.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom