The point being you are only for the freedom of speech when you agree with it.
No, no, no.
I believe freedom of speech is valuable.
I think letting Libs speak is insightful for those who weren't socialists and find it unbelievable somebody could actually believe their clap trap... plus it's entertaining. I still get kicks listening to folks who should be calling themselves Komrades.
If burning flags is their thing, and it is... then let them show their love of country and patriotism that way... LOL... let their speech define who they are and who they support.
I encourage Libs to speak... open and often.
I wish Obama would have gone little further than "yes we can", "now is the time", "we are the ones we have been waiting for", Hope, Change and Unite.
He had so much opportunity and said so little.
He did provide enough to give us insight to the Reign of Error through remarks that he thought weren't recorded or through his wife, friends and mentors... but let's face it... he wasn't open, honest, forthcoming about who he is and was, who his radical friends were, and how he wanted to roll this country.
He had ample opportunity, but we got barely a taste of the sacred water... now we've been given fire hoses and told to open our yaps and enjoy the full force of his Eurosocialist hydrant.
You know, like when he spoke about "bitter clingers", or with Joe and "spread the wealth around", or "57 states" or "I'd never throw Jeremiah under the bus... he's family", or "Granny was a latent racist" or "no preconditions" or "let's make the military take care of their own insurance" and the like... it would have been nice for him to extrapolate just a little on his Grand Schemes to remake America... with a "K".
So much opportunity to speak freely about his grand schemes, and he chose not to and the AMMP (Lib Media) never pushed him.
I wonder why?
.