Thats not what I am suggesting.... let me try it this way:
1 us gets attacked (9/11)
2. Bush declares Iran, Iraq and North Korea as an "Axis of Evil"
Bush CORRECTLY declared Iran, Iraq and North Korea as an “Axis of Evil.”
To suggest otherwise requires willful denial or ignorance.
3. we briefly enter Afghanistan to go after Bin Laden
Briefly? Last time I looked, we are still there and will be there for the long haul. We didn’t just go into Afghanistan to go after Bin Laden; we went after a rogue regime who chose to protect Bin Laden and actually treated terrorists as welcome guests.
4. then we enter Iraq selling the notion of Iraq being in possession of WMD's
This is again a false ans specious argument. Obviously you have never actually read the UN resolutions and the Joint Resolution passed on a nearly unanimous bi-partisan basis on Iraq for the REAL reasons.
Here is a link so that you can READ and become INFORMED:
Text of Joint Resolution On Iraq Passed By The United States Congress [Octover 11, 2002]
I want you to count how many references to WMDs this 1,850 plus word document contains.
I know it is convenient for Liberals to ignore the REAL reasons we went in and want to FALSLEY believe that the region was better served with Saddam in charge rather than a freely elected Democracy, but those with brains would tend to disagree based on Saddams history.
5. After not finding any we decide to stay.... Much of the world could construe this as the US simply trying to manufacture reasons to enter and invade a country who's regime we have designated as evil
The only ones in the world trying to construe this are terrorists, leftists and Liberals who think that forcing a rogue regime to comply with UN resolutions with force is NEVER an option and anyone who does, especially a US President, should then be impugned and the historic record constantly re-written to fit their narrow and myopic partisan point of view.
Iraq led by Saddam was an evil regime that threatened its neighbors and peace in the region. To suggest otherwise once more requires willful denial or ignorance.
6. NK and Iran realize they cannot really defend against a US invasion they need a reliable deterrant..... they jump start a relitively dusty nuclear arms program....
Once again you take the false and specious arguments of rogue regimes and terrorist sympathizers to make the absurd rationalization that Iran and North Korea need to develop nukes to protect them from the mean old USA.
But this absurd and false argument requires the belief that the US just wantonly invades nations for no reason at all. Iran has never invaded a neighboring nation in modern times and there is no reason to invade. Better to isolate them for the support of terrorists. North Korea can’t feed it’s people let alone successfully invade their neighbor to the South; better to isolate them.
The REALITY and TRUTH is that by developing nuclear weapons, they deliberately place their citizens and neighbors at far greater risk.
Does anyone in the world with a brain think that a few nukes would prevent the USA from imposing its will if it chose to do so with nukes? What an idiotic notion and one that can only be expressed by ignorance or despotic nations who need an enemy to exert total control over their citizens.
I dunno..... seems to me to be a relitively logical progression especially once you consider the fact that we basically refused to talk to either of these nations at this particular point in time besides sending relatively threatening press releases their way
More absurdity and specious lies to support a purely partisan point of view; the US was actively engaged with the UN and Iran just as it has been with North Korea to force them to comply with the treaties they signed against nuclear proliferation and to get them to come to the table.
I guess when you find yourself in the wilderness avoiding the historic record and facts, you have to continually fabricate your own version of reality to support such specious claims.
Carry on; I look forward to correcting more of your false perceptions and outright lies to support an obvious partisan bias for purely partisan political purposes. :2wave: