- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I would like to add, the Captain spent several posts dishonestly claiming my point was that people who choose not to carry guns are meek. Specifically this post:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/1057981162-post61.html
"Anyone who chooses to not have a gun is being or has been taught to be meek."
Even after correcting his error he insisted on fighting me on this point I did not make. Not only have I posted my position clearly several times, I linked an article, a you tube, and other information, that most others got except for skycore, will rockwell, and Captian"Courtesy". He then tried to morph his statement into something else.
This and only this is the issue regarding my pointing out the Captain's blatant dishonesty in this discussion with me. If he wants to continue to obfuscate in order to weasel out of his baiting behavior so be it. I care not. But when he follows through with his threats he made to me in PM regarding calling ME dishonest in other threads (has happened already) because I laughed at his demand for a public apology to him. Lets remember when the **** hits the fan, and everyone is all pissed off. THIS is were the Captain started it.
I will tell him here now publicly. You sir, will get what you give. Please act accordingly.
The discussion and a good description of my true feelings on this topic, to which I was attacked dishonestly over, can be continued at the link below. Lets endeavor to keep this one sane.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/Death-Penalty/46491-guns-sheepdogs-nutcases-victims.html
Refuting all of the dishonesty in the above post would be rather simple, as would showing how, as usual, it was the Reverend who started this. However, this is not appropriate for this thread, so...
Moderator's Warning: |
You will cease these kinds of posts, upstairs, Reverend, or there will be further consequences. |