• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New Afghan Law Limits Womens' Rights

winston53660 said:
So do you want Kings and Queens in a position of power?
Click to expand...

Well I'd reform our constitution to a more decentralist version while stressing continuity which would not require real power for the monarch if I had the complete chance but failing that then yes I'd like them to retain their ancient power and role in our constitution. We have a mixed constitution in Britain with a place for democracy in the commons, aristocracy in the lords and monarchy in crown and I'm not ashamed of that. It is far better and safer than having a simple construction of gov't.
 
Wessexman said:
Well I'd reform our constitution to a more decentralist version while stressing continuity which would not require real power for the monarch if I had the complete chance but failing that then yes I'd like them to retain their ancient power and role in our constitution. We have a mixed constitution in Britain with a place for democracy in the commons, aristocracy in the lords and monarchy in crown and I'm not ashamed of that. It is far better and safer than having a simple construction of gov't.
Click to expand...

Thank you for the straight forward answer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom