• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Taliban Chief Vows 'Amazing' Attack on Washington 'Soon'

Renae

Banned
Suspended
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
50,241
Reaction score
19,243
Location
San Antonio Texas
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Conservative
DERA ISMAIL KHAN, Pakistan — The commander of the Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility Tuesday for a deadly assault on a Pakistani police academy and said the group was planning a terrorist attack on the White House that would "amaze" the world.
FOXNews.com - Taliban Chief Vows 'Amazing' Attack on Washington 'Soon' - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News

Now his boast is of interest, but what interests me more is this:

The AP has spoken to Mehsud several times in the past and recognized his voice, and a request for an interview with Mehsud was submitted through his aide. The militant leader also granted phone interviews to other media organizations
The AP can get a hold of this guy... but we cannot find him.

Amazing that.
 
FOXNews.com - Taliban Chief Vows 'Amazing' Attack on Washington 'Soon' - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News

Now his boast is of interest, but what interests me more is this:


The AP can get a hold of this guy... but we cannot find him.

Amazing that.

He's just a ****bag AlQuack loser. He needs to be exterminated.

Send a message in a language terrorist ****bags understand .... send his head in a box ... to Mullah Omar.

Let mullah numbnuts learn... he and his cronies are not going to win.
 
The Taliban has been saying this since 9-11... I'll believe it when I see it.
 
The Taliban should not even be functional and or newsworthy at this point in time. It is a shame they are.
 
He's just a ****bag AlQuack loser. He needs to be exterminated.

Send a message in a language terrorist ****bags understand .... send his head in a box ... to Mullah Omar.

Let mullah numbnuts learn... he and his cronies are not going to win.

He is a leader in a part of the world which has been invaded continously for the pat 400 years by white people. During these invasions millions of his people, primarily the pashtuns have been killed. To him the us does not discriminate when it decides to kill pashtuns, so why should he discriminate in killing foriegners occcupying his homeland.

If a Iranian army invaded the states,because it wanted to build a pipeline through arizona, and killed memebrs of your family in the process, would you laie down and accept it or would you fight using every option you had.
 
He is a leader in a part of the world which has been invaded continously for the pat 400 years by white people. During these invasions millions of his people, primarily the pashtuns have been killed. To him the us does not discriminate when it decides to kill pashtuns, so why should he discriminate in killing foriegners occcupying his homeland.

If a Iranian army invaded the states,because it wanted to build a pipeline through arizona, and killed memebrs of your family in the process, would you laie down and accept it or would you fight using every option you had.

He's a scumbag killer, and no manner of excuse by relativist can change that. He should die along with anyone else that shares his world view... or makes excuses for it.
 
He is a leader in a part of the world which has been invaded continously for the pat 400 years by white people. During these invasions millions of his people, primarily the pashtuns have been killed. To him the us does not discriminate when it decides to kill pashtuns, so why should he discriminate in killing foriegners occcupying his homeland.

If a Iranian army invaded the states,because it wanted to build a pipeline through arizona, and killed memebrs of your family in the process, would you laie down and accept it or would you fight using every option you had.

Regardless ... he's a douchebag terrorist who needs a dirtnap.

For that matter ... Mullah Omar needs a dirt nap.
 
The AP can get a hold of this guy... but we cannot find him.

Amazing that.

What would be even more amazing is that we have found him, along with most of the other terrorist leaders, including Bin Laden, and rather than 'martyring them', we've spent the last seven years following their every move, listening to their every conversation, and generally leading them around in circles.

The best 'spy stories' are the ones we never know about, after all.

;)
 
Douchbag terrorist, or freedom fighter defending his country against invasion? i guess it all depends on which side of the dirt ball you squat on for the brief time that you do.
 
Douchbag terrorist, or freedom fighter defending his country against invasion? i guess it all depends on which side of the dirt ball you squat on for the brief time that you do.

If you are bereft of morals and too craven to take a stance and hold to it I suppose that would seem logical to you. I however believe right is right, wrong is wrong, and people like these scum suckers in the Taliban believe in killing innocent people to force a horrible system on others.

They are evil, pure and simple, and I ain't afraid to say so.
 
What would be even more amazing is that we have found him, along with most of the other terrorist leaders, including Bin Laden, and rather than 'martyring them', we've spent the last seven years following their every move, listening to their every conversation, and generally leading them around in circles.

The best 'spy stories' are the ones we never know about, after all.

;)

That would be a good deal, however if there is another attack, that kills people... well then that just goes right out the window.
 
If you are bereft of morals and too craven to take a stance and hold to it I suppose that would seem logical to you. I however believe right is right, wrong is wrong, and people like these scum suckers in the Taliban believe in killing innocent people to force a horrible system on others.

They are evil, pure and simple, and I ain't afraid to say so.


So...a person who is killing people, in defense of other people coming to his country to kill his own people, is bereft of morals and craven?
Interesting interpretation of those words.
Right is right and wrong is wrong, by which values and which culture...yours? white, christian, conservative america? do you want to force the world by gunpoint to adapt your values and your morality?
yes...the Taliban have killed civilians. do you know who else has killed civilians? the united states military. do you know who else would like to force their "system" on others? the united states.
that's not being bereft of morals or craven...that's simply calling it like it is.
if you're too blind to see that, then you need to re-evaluate the "morals" or whatever it is that blinds you.
who attacked who first and who did what to who is besides the point i'm making.
you claim that they are evil for killing innocent civilians...then what does that make "us," when we turn around and react in the same manner? let me guess your logic here...i assume that you are "good", because america and jesus are on your side?
 
Last edited:
yes...the Taliban have killed civilians. do you know who else has killed civilians? the united states military. do you know who else would like to force their "system" on others? the united states.

real simple difference, but you're not here for debate, you signed up with the single reason to come on here and peddle your idiotic pathetic propoganda.

Show me where in Afghanistan the United States purposefully went SPECIFICALLY after Civilian Targets for the purpose of killing civilians. Because I can show you where those funded and supported by the Taliban did just that.
 
real simple difference, but you're not here for debate, you signed up with the single reason to come on here and peddle your idiotic pathetic propoganda.

Show me where in Afghanistan the United States purposefully went SPECIFICALLY after Civilian Targets for the purpose of killing civilians. Because I can show you where those funded and supported by the Taliban did just that.


well, of course i'm not here for debate. good logic. i take it that you believe debate is two people who think like you taking issue on minor points?

the dead don't care whether someone SPECIFICALLY came after them. Whether the bullets and bombs that have killed over 7,000 civilians in afghanistan came from american soldiers with a SPECIFIC agenda to kill innocent bystanders doesn't matter. what matters is that it happened and is still happening.
it's a pretty basic concept...got it?
 
Calling this guy names and threatening what your response will be if he attacks....wasn't that Bush's attitude before 9/11?
Hopefully our law enforcement agencies are two steps ahead of these people. Judging from the recent attack in Pakistan and the attack in Mumbai, we can expect teams of armed men to appear in Washington simultaneously, shooting innocent people, blowing themselves up, and creating mayhem until they are all captured or killed. Why not be smart about a threat like this....preparation is more useful than bluster.
 
real simple difference, but you're not here for debate, you signed up with the single reason to come on here and peddle your idiotic pathetic propoganda.

Show me where in Afghanistan the United States purposefully went SPECIFICALLY after Civilian Targets for the purpose of killing civilians. Because I can show you where those funded and supported by the Taliban did just that.


well, of course i'm not here for debate. good logic. i take it that you believe debate is two people who think like you taking issue on minor points?

the dead don't care whether someone SPECIFICALLY came after them. Whether the bullets and bombs that have killed over 7,000 civilians in afghanistan came from american soldiers with a SPECIFIC agenda to kill innocent bystanders doesn't matter. what matters is that it happened and is still happening.
it's a pretty basic concept...got it?


So what you're telling me is that morally, someone that is driving without as much sleep as he probably should have, falls asleep at the wheel, and hits someone is as morally evil and dispicable as someone who gets in their car and purposefully searches out someone to run them down.
 
If you are bereft of morals and too craven to take a stance and hold to it I suppose that would seem logical to you. I however believe right is right, wrong is wrong, and people like these scum suckers in the Taliban believe in killing innocent people to force a horrible system on others.

They are evil, pure and simple, and I ain't afraid to say so.

They say the same thing about the West.

Beirut burning during the 1982 Israel-Lebanon War
yyy.1982.plo.beirut.lebanon.jpg

Siege of Beirut - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
No...I'm telling you that the innocent dead are still the innocent dead, no matter who was behind the wheel and no matter why they were behind the wheel.
 
No...I'm telling you that the innocent dead are still the innocent dead, no matter who was behind the wheel and no matter why they were behind the wheel.

Ladies and gents meet aqupubs long lost twin brother separated at birth
 
so, there was someone else on this forum who actually made sense?
 
Back
Top Bottom