• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Taliban Chief Vows 'Amazing' Attack on Washington 'Soon'

yes, to the person that is dead it may not matter.

But the conversation stemmed from your implying that there was nothing morally or ethically difference between a "terrorist douchebag" and a "freedom fighter". That morally, the United States actions are no better than the talibans.

So if you honeslty believe that, you must believe those two drivers are morally equivilent.

There's further difference. The United States goes to lengths to reduce the amount of potential civilian causalty, its people generally feel remorse when civilians are killed in such things. Those in the Taliban specifically CHOSE to target civilians, reveled in the killing of said civilians, and had no remorse.

You seem to be the only person on this thread seeming to claim that somehow the Terrorists are no different, if not perhaps better for not "starting it", than the U.S. Seriously, who else is actually agreeing with your twisted stance on this?

Its not that everyone has to agree to debate, but you have to use a bit of logic or honesty. You're trying to equate two seperate types of actions to being morally equal, yes or no?
 
No...I'm telling you that the innocent dead are still the innocent dead, no matter who was behind the wheel and no matter why they were behind the wheel.

Ok?

And your point is?

If the arabs would leave Israel alone, there were not be any problems of this type.

The Arabs only have the object barbarity of their religion to blame for their pain.
 
Ok?

And your point is?

If the arabs would leave Israel alone, there were not be any problems of this type.

The Arabs only have the object barbarity of their religion to blame for their pain.

If there stupid enough to mix islam with there politics of all religions, then they shouldnt even be trusted with countries. And to think Iran will have a nucleur programme or whatever the hell it is. Id be quicker to hand over the keys to my car to a burglar and trust he wont take it then hand over nucleur technology to these bloody Al Mushmash's.
 
The Arabs as far as Israel goes is a perfect example as to why seperation of religion and politics is a beautiful, beautiful idea.
 
Another big problem caused by people who buy drugs.

Those Taliban neanderthals wouldn't have two nickles to rub together if it wasn't for the money they get from drugs.
 
Another big problem caused by people who buy drugs.

Those Taliban neanderthals wouldn't have two nickles to rub together if it wasn't for the money they get from drugs.

I cant imagine Osama stoned
 
That would be a good deal, however if there is another attack, that kills people... well then that just goes right out the window.

Perhaps. But one of my completely unsubstantiated notions over the past few years has been that we do know exactly where Bin Laden is. I've got zero evidence to support that claim. But it's been a sneaking suspicion of mine all the same.

;)
 
Another big problem caused by people who buy drugs.

Those Taliban neanderthals wouldn't have two nickles to rub together if it wasn't for the money they get from drugs.

If the drugs were legal, they wouldn't be making money off them. Those against drugs support terrorists.
 
Whatever those scumbags do it wont be nearly as bad as 9/11.

While 9/11 was a terribly tragic day and the worst terror attack in history I think that an attack on the White House itself will deeply hurt morale along with the already tarnished view of the US as being 'weak' by other terrorist groups.
 
The Taliban should not even be functional and or newsworthy at this point in time. It is a shame they are.

Talbian is a loose and ill-used word. It is applied to many people and tribal groups who are simply traditionalist and don't like the US in the region. Only something like 20% are actually "Taliban".
 
Back
Top Bottom