• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Terror inmates may be released in US: intel chief

These guys are Uigurs who will in all likelihood be detained and tortured if sent back to the PRC. They've been cleared of terrorism charges. Their only crime is their ethnicity.
 
These guys are Uigurs who will in all likelihood be detained and tortured if sent back to the PRC. They've been cleared of terrorism charges. Their only crime is their ethnicity.

Ethnicity + religion = terrorist, to some people.
 
Why are we taking Uigurs and putting them in Gitmo anyways? If they had been fighting Rushkies in the 80s they would have been called Freedom Fighters? Or is it that since we now owe China's corrupt and enslaving government a ****load of money that they've become 'terror suspects'?
 
If they were ever arrested by the US Military there is no question that they are indeed terrorists and will jump at the first chance to blow themselves up. It's not like the military arrests people who "might be" terrorists. They only arrest people that they are 100% absolute sure are terrorists.

:roll:

Well a number of people have been released without charge years ago so surely that consitutes an admission that some of them where not terroists.
 
Well a number of people have been released without charge years ago so surely that consitutes an admission that some of them where not terroists.

Sorry I should have wrapped my comment in [Sarcasm] tags.
 
Records reveal that dozens of terrorists who have been released from custody at Guantanamo Bay have rejoined their terror gangs and gone back to their day job killing our soldiers...In July 2005, commander Jeffrey Gordon, a Pentagon spokesman, said that "our reports indicate that at least thirty former Guantanamo detainees have taken part in anti-coalition militant activities after leaving U.S. detention. Some have been killed in combat in Afghanistan and Pakistan." By June 2007, the Washington Post was reporting that "possibly as many as fifty former Guantanamo detainees have returned to the battlefield to fight against the United states and its allies."

These men were captured by American troops-soldiers who were risking their lives to bring them in-because they posed a threat to the United States. Yet after holding them, we have let them go, so that they could return to the ranks of our adversaries.

Let's remember that these men are not in prison because of some crime they have committed for which they are to serve a determined sentence and then be released, their debt to society paid. These inmates are enemy warriors captured in battle.

In December 2001 [Abdullah] Mehsud was captured by Afghan forces and turned over to American authorities. He was held at Guantanamo until March 2004, when we let him go.

How did he get out? He hid his identity. When he was first captured, he was carrying a false Afghan identity card; according to the Washington Post, "while in custody he maintained the fiction that he was an innocent Afghan tribesman."

Mehsud boasted to reporters that U.S. officials never realized he was a Pakistani deeply involved with terrorist organizations. "I managed to keep my Pakistani identity hidden all these years," Mehsud boasted to Gulf News.

excerpt from Fleeced by Dick Morris and Eileen McGann

I am in no ways an advocate of holding innocent men, but it also seems that if we do not have sufficient means to rightfully determine who is in reality innocent and who is affiliated with terrorist organizations we must err on the side of caution that benefits the safety of U.S. citizens, not potential terrorists. When these detainees are released, in no way should it be on U.S. soil, since all indications point to the assumption that at least some "innocents" will be those who have managed to artfully keep their real identities and affiliations hidden from investigators. In my opinion, even one would be too many.

If the Obama administration is unwilling to deport them to their native countries where they would undoubtedly learn the real meaning of torture, perhaps Canada will take them...
 
Last edited:
They also grab the civilians that are in the area they are being shot from by the terrorists hiding among civilians.

There is a big difference between being part of a political group of people against a specific political outcome and being part of a smaller group that takes it upon themselves to take aggressive action in the name of the political group.

Those people that normally would not have taken aggressive action are then convinced that aggressive action is the only solution since the same action is used against them by the US.




Lets just hope they get released in places like san diego. ;)
 
GitmoRehab_1195x799.jpg


.
 
Even the Bush gang admtited that a bunch of these guys did nothing wrong.
We know for a fact that the Bush gang illegally concealed exculpatory evidence to that effect.
The only justification we have for holding them is Bush's claim that they might be terrorists.
A claim which he had years to prove in any court. And failed.


And all the screeching to the contrary is just yahoo fear-mongering, which is only going to persuade the same mouth-breathers who already hate Obama anyway.

So this whole thing is a waste of time.
 
Your pedantry is straining our patience.
Again, it does not mention any sort of financial assistance. Ever heard of volunteers? Stop jumping to conclusions and speculations.
 
Whatever it will be won't be cheap, and it will be tax payer funded.

I prefer we send them from where they came, or back to the battle field.
They'd get a 100 meter head start.

May they be comfortable next door to you.

.
I would gladly live next door to someone who was wrongfully accused of being a terrorist. I do not live my life in fear.
 
The only assistance they need is a boat ticket back to terrorist land.
Can they take ignorant, spoonfed Islam-haters with them? I think you would fare quite well over there, infidel.
 
Can they take ignorant, spoonfed Islam-haters with them? I think you would fare quite well over there, infidel.

You seem to love them and their culture. You would do better living in facism than I would.
 
You seem to love them and their culture. You would do better living in facism than I would.
I have rarely commented on their culture. I do, however, understand their religion, a claim that you cannot make.
 
I have rarely commented on their culture. I do, however, understand their religion, a claim that you cannot make.

Why would I want to understand such a violent culture?
 
Well good for him. Do you think they will be releasing these "terror suspects" on the unknowing populace if they think they are a hazard?
Yes, and they plan to give them Welfare.
 
I would gladly live next door to someone who was wrongfully accused of being a terrorist. I do not live my life in fear.

That's nice. But how do you know that? Because he tells you?
 
That's nice. But how do you know that? Because he tells you?

If after seven years of "enhanced interrogation" the authorities at Gitmo decided they pose no threat, then that's good enough for me. Sending them back to China would be a crime against humanity. I just found this article. Apparently the government of Munich is willing to accept them.

And the southern city, Germany’s third largest, is also the first city in the world to say it is prepared to take in 17 Uighurs held in Guantanamo Bay for seven years, although they were cleared of any wrongdoing.
 
Back
Top Bottom