- Joined
- Sep 22, 2005
- Messages
- 11,430
- Reaction score
- 2,282
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Its not child abuse.
What else do you call the sexual mutilation of an infant?
Its not child abuse.
Its not mutilation.What else do you call the sexual mutilation of an infant?
Its not mutilation.
If anything an uncircumsized penis looks mutilated.
Amputating an effective and healthy body part isn't "mutilation"?
Since when?
Your personal esthetics are irrelevant, since we're not discussin' what you got swingin'.
We're discussing a physical assault on a baby boy.
Its no more an assault than sticking a needle in them for unnecessary vaccinations.
If the vacination is unnecessary, then, by definition, it's assualt.
However, since no permanent harm usually happens from vaccinations, and since the intent of vaccinations is to prevent disease, that's usually acceptable.
Since the intent of circumcision is the permanent irrevocable damage to the child's sex organ, without valid medical purpose, of course circumcision is assault.
What you call "damage" I don't consider to be so.
What were you saying about my personal "esthetics"
Does the foreskin perform it's function after it's been cut off?
^^^by posting the whole article here I beleive you have violated their copyright protection
What is the foreskin's function to begin with?
Protect the glans.
Provide a space for thousands of nerve endings.
Play peekaboo.
Provide a space for the concealment of very small objects.
The first two are probably the most important.
Protect the glans.
Provide a space for thousands of nerve endings.
Play peekaboo.
Provide a space for the concealment of very small objects.
The first two are probably the most important.
so you are just fine with female circumcision too than?What you call "damage" I don't consider to be so.
What were you saying about my personal "esthetics"
If you wear clothes you're not going to get abrasions.
Johannesburg - One boy died and four others are in a critical condition after alleged botched circumcisions near Ntabankulu in the Eastern Cape, SABC news reported on Sunday.
the whole world is trying to be hebrew:roll:
The foreskin has very little to almost no significance in protecting the glands considering the foreskin is very thin. In this case it has no effective purpose. The foreskin clogs up bacteria after excretion and sex and so ups the chance of sexual infection/disease transmission, and well, to put it simply, "nob cheese". When you bring into account these health factors and the whole point of the foreskin being there in the first place, its well worth considering circumcision. At most you will experience decreased sexual drive but not enough to notice. Theres no need or very little scientific reasoning to keep the foreskin in place. Unless of course you keep it for the sake of making your little maggot look bigger. :mrgreen:
It is said that the foreskin enhances the sensitivity of the organ, resulting in a greatly heightened sexual experience.
How do you circumcise a whale, you send down four skin divers
How do you circumcise a whale, you send down four skin divers