• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes for

Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

So we're really back on that again after getting yourself totally trounced yesterday?

Some people are just incapable of learning. :lol:

Honestly, jallman, I think he genuinely believes he was not trounced yesterday. :shock: I guess stranger things have happened. ;)
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

Honestly, jallman, I think he genuinely believes he was not trounced yesterday. :shock: I guess stranger things have happened. ;)

The funny thing about it is that he and I are actually aligned on the same general side of the issue. It's just that he hasn't presented the argument in a coherent fashion because he's too busy repeating the same tired bull**** line of "your nuh-us notwithstanding". And he's too damned obtuse to stop and realize the he's even spelling "nuh-uh" wrong. :lol:
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

Yeah, read the thread. It wasn't just CC that trounced you. It was everyone. As usual.
I see. So, you admit you cannot pont to the post where my argument was specifically refuted.

Thanks. Glad you finallly found the stones to admit it.
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

I see. So, you admit you cannot pont to the post where my argument was specifically refuted.

Thanks. Glad you finallly found the stones to admit it.

See, there you go again. You have to make up things that people say so that you can justify, in your own mind only, puffing up your chest and cawing "I win, I win".

If you just once answered what was said by a real post and not just the imagined posts that only you seem to be seeing, you might make a giant stride toward not being the single most dishonest hack on this site.

I mean, aquapub, for all his faults, at least attempts to ground himself in the conversation and not some addled fantasy bulletin of his own creation.
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

"no you are"

"no you are"

"NO YOU ARE"

"NO YOU ARE"



This thread is actually something that is a rather interesting topic. One that demonstrates Obama's contempt for the troops. It seems however to be turning into a cat fight.....

Here is an idea.....


gtfo.gif






:mrgreen:
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

"no you are"

"no you are"

"NO YOU ARE"

"NO YOU ARE"



This thread is actually something that is a rather interesting topic. One that demonstrates Obama's contempt for the troops. It seems however to be turning into a cat fight.....

Here is an idea.....


gtfo.gif






:mrgreen:

Nuh-uh. :mrgreen:
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

See, there you go again. You have to make up things that people say so that you can justify, in your own mind only, puffing up your chest and cawing "I win, I win".
Its very simple:

If you or anyone else has indeed, as you and CC claim, shown, in specific term, how my argument is wrong, you can supply the post that does that.

Thus far, you have not done so, even after continued attempts to get you to do so -- instead, all you do is misdirect, obscure and insult.

So... put up or shut up.
 
Last edited:
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

See, there you go again. You have to make up things that people say so that you can justify, in your own mind only, puffing up your chest and cawing "I win, I win".

If you just once answered what was said by a real post and not just the imagined posts that only you seem to be seeing, you might make a giant stride toward not being the single most dishonest hack on this site.

I mean, aquapub, for all his faults, at least attempts to ground himself in the conversation and not some addled fantasy bulletin of his own creation.

Okay I declare goobieman the winner:roll:

Now onward to some interesting discourse.
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

Its very simple:

If you or anyone else has indeed, as you and CC claim, specificlaly shown how my argument is wrong, you can supply the post that does that.

Thus far, you have not done so, even after continued attempts to get you to do so -- instead, all you do is misdirect, obscure and insult.

So... put up or shut up.

Already did. And if I do again, all you are going to do is ask me to do it again and again. It goes back to that whole "can't seem to learn" issue you have.
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

Already did.
This is an outright lie.

So very sad.
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

Okay I declare goobieman the winner:roll:

Now onward to some interesting discourse.

Agreed. So basically where we were was that the VA health care system IS a socialist mechanism but that it is one reserved exclusively (justifiably so) to the troops as a compensation for them serving the country.
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

Agreed. So basically where we were was that the VA health care system IS a socialist mechanism but that it is one reserved exclusively (justifiably so) to the troops as a compensation for them serving the country.

I totally agree. It is the word "socialist" that freaks people gobbieman out.
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

I totally agree. It is the word "socialist" that freaks people gobbieman out.

Let's not go back there again. ;)
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

I totally agree. It is the word "socialist" that freaks people gobbieman out.

Well, the left has coopted the word "liberal" so there's nothing else to call it. Leftist, socialist, etc. will all carry a negative connotation in lieu of their historical failure.
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

Its impossible to (honestly) claim that I have been trounced when you have not explained, in any way, how I am wrong.

When you think you can do that, get back to me.

Until then:
The position stands, all of your "nuh-us" not witstanding.


Nice to see you can laugh at yourself and your good buddy, CC.
Jeez, Goobieman. I just read the past 3 pages of this thread... Why haven't you quit yet? Even Truth Detector knows when to cut and run.
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

Jeez, Goobieman. I just read the past 3 pages of this thread... Why haven't you quit yet? Even Truth Detector knows when to cut and run.
I'm more than happy to let YOU try to find a post that specifically refutes my argument, if you think you can.

Or, you can perpetually refuse to do so, all the while deluding yourself that you have.

Until then, the position stands, all of your "nuh-us" not witstanding.

:mrgreen:

PS:
If you want to be groovey-cool, like Jallman, you can insult me, too!
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

I'm more than happy to let YOU try to find a post that specifically refutes my argument, if you think you can.

Or, you can perpetually refuse to do so, all the while deluding yourself that you have.

Until then, the position stands, all of your "nuh-us" not witstanding.

:mrgreen:

PS:
If you want to be groovey-cool, like Jallman, you can insult me, too!
No, I do my best not insult people(I have exceptions, you are not one). I'm just trying to help you save face.
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

No, I do my best not insult people(I have exceptions, you are not one). I'm just trying to help you save face.
Your is a false premise.
As none of my detractors have, as yet, shown, specifically, how my argument is wrong, there's no need for me to 'safe face'.
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

No, I do my best not insult people(I have exceptions, you are not one). I'm just trying to help you save face.




Yeah, cause you don't wanna piss off them "sentient beings from other dimensions" ....... :aliens1:




:2razz::2razz::2razz:
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

As a veteran my first reaction to this was "what the **** are you doing Mr. President?" I am hyper sensitive to any mention of messing with veterans benefits. I agree with most of those here that these benefits were absolutely earned and very much deserved. However after reading much about this issue I don't think there was anything nefarious going on. I just think that Obama floated a very bad idea that someone in his circle of advisers concocted and pitched to him as an "everybody wins" type of thing. I seriously doubt he dreamed this up himself. His commitment to this idea was obviously very weak as it was dropped rather quickly. It also faced by-partisan opposition which is very important considering some of the retarded bull**** that was being slung here about the left hating our troops (a big "go **** yourself" to the haters on that one). Now we can speculate why Obama backed off so quickly, and I know that we will all have our opinions. It has definitely made me look at him with a more critical eye, but I'll live.

Regardless, it was dropped and that is very important. Our vets deserve the very best we can give them, without question.

And a big shout out to my man jallman...I think I may have reached close to double digit thanks in this thread because of your work here. You know why. I laughed my ass off at a couple of posts in particular. Thank you good sir!
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

Editor's Correction:
OMG, virtually the entire LEFT hates our nation's veterans and active military! Virtually the entire LEFT hates our nation's veterans and active military! Intel and police included.

Not exactly breaking news, but always worth pointing out.
Good job aps.

Please prove your assertion above. Give us links with percentages. Also define the concept "virtually the entire" so we can be clear.

Thank you.

Oh, and if you can't, retract your hyperpartisan hackery.
 
Re: The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes

All you need to do is tell me how I am wrong.
But you won't.
Because you know you cannot.

Given that, the position stands, all of your "nuh-us" not witstanding.

All you need to do is show you understand the concept of socialized health care. But you won't because you can't.

And because of that, my position and opinion of your position stands...no matter how much bluster you post. You still lose.
 
Back
Top Bottom