• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House fires back at Rush Limbaugh

/FACEPALM



seriously? so there is no pendelum effect?

Evidence:

Last few elections.

Obama's approval rating.

Republican's approval rating.

Democratic majorities at all levels of government.

The changing demographics of the country (we are less white fundimentalist evangelical than we used to be).

The future of the Republican Party are guys like Charlie Crist, not Limbaugh.
 
Evidence:

Last few elections.

Obama's approval rating.

Republican's approval rating.

Democratic majorities at all levels of government.

The changing demographics of the country (we are less white fundimentalist evangelical than we used to be).

The future of the Republican Party are guys like Charlie Crist, not Limbaugh.



This is like arguing with a moonie...... :lol:
 
Its not hype, its reality. Obama's approval rating is at 68%. The Republican base is now the smallest it has been since Watergate. Republicans right now have no support at all among moderates and independents.

Know what?

DOES NOT MATTER.

We are in the minority until 2010.
We have no election tomorrow.

When it gets to be August next year tell me what is what.
That is a lot of time for people to reflect and reconsider.
Even you might come to the logical conclusion that the Democrats are incompetent and a danger to America and Americans.

Right now we are rebuilding and Obama is giving us a helping hand as he seeks to reform America into his little socialist utopia.

Last I knew you could fool most people once.
Have to say The Clintons and Dick Morris manged a stealth campaign in the south that fooled 'em twice. (It's a great lesson in modern US politics).

Another difference.
For once Obama will have a public record to pin his name to.
He will not be able to get away with vague responses and then throw his head to the sky as his minions chant "Yes we can" and hold their signs of Hope. Change. Unity.

The days of campaigning... of blowing smoke and speaking in generalities are gone. The next one we will have had the real Marxist revealed. He's already done it.

He's had more than a couple "read my lips moments" already.

Those crazy kids...:baby1
 
Last edited:
Evidence:

Last few elections.

Liberal Democrat to Liberal Republican and back to Liberal Democrat, mhmm, keep going...

Obama's approval rating.

...in sharp decline as voters develop buyer's remorse, continue....

Republican's approval rating.

...shares the Democrat approval rating as lower than Bush's...

Democratic majorities at all levels of government.

...people thought they were getting rid of Liberals....oops, the voted in more liberals instead, this will cost the Left in 2 years....

The changing demographics of the country (we are less white fundimentalist evangelical than we used to be).

Ahh and only white fundamentalists support Conservative ideals, right.....

The future of the Republican Party are guys like Charlie Crist, not Limbaugh.

Who?

***
All your "evidence" is crap, you have no argument.
 
No doubt. I just seen Bush do it twice. :rofl

When Bush ran, he clearly told people what he wanted to do.
Bush was open about it.

He even made a bunch of Libs gag when he professed that Christ was the world's greatest philosopher.
 
When Bush ran, he clearly told people what he wanted to do.
Bush was open about it.

He even made a bunch of Libs gag when he professed that Christ was the world's greatest philosopher.

Hmmmm... I don't recall Bush ever speaking clearly about much of anything. I seem to remember a bunch of smoke and mirrors and cowboy one-liners. But I have to admit, it was funny sometimes. I am gonna miss the deer in the headlights look and the classic ADD brain-farts.
 
Liberal Democrat to Liberal Republican and back to Liberal Democrat, mhmm, keep going...



...in sharp decline as voters develop buyer's remorse, continue....



...shares the Democrat approval rating as lower than Bush's...



...people thought they were getting rid of Liberals....oops, the voted in more liberals instead, this will cost the Left in 2 years....



Ahh and only white fundamentalists support Conservative ideals, right.....



Who?

***
All your "evidence" is crap, you have no argument.

If you think that the Republicans of the last 8 years were "liberal", then you are so delusional that one could probably get a committal order on you.

Its absurd.

Liberals are Pro-Environment, Republicans of the last 8 years have certainly not been.

Liberals are Pro-Choice, Republicans of the last 8 years have certainly not been.

Liberals are for a strict Separation of Church and State, Republicans of the last 8 years are practically theocrats.

Liberals are for progressive taxation, Republicans of the last 8 years have been for a flattening of the tax structure and shifting the tax burden from investors to labor.

Liberals are for Universal Healthcare, Republicans are not.

I can go on.

Just because Republicans outspend Democrats does not mean they are liberal. It just means the crap they want: Wars, $2000 toliet seats from Defense Contractors, are really expensive.

Its beyond delusional to think that Americans want a hard core conservative and if they don't get it they go out and vote for a liberal.
 
Hmmmm... I don't recall Bush ever speaking clearly about much of anything. I seem to remember a bunch of smoke and mirrors and cowboy one-liners. But I have to admit, it was funny sometimes. I am gonna miss the deer in the headlights look and the classic ADD brain-farts.

He did run on a clear agenda twice.

I am waiting for a specific liberal answer to the contrary. One from their usual grab bag of misrepresentations... tick... tick... tick...
 
Last edited:
Hogwash. Face it, the majority of Americans see you and your ideas as extremist.

:rofl Yeah my views are "extremist." How extremist am I; I believe in paying for legislation instead of passing pork without a debate about how to pay for it, holding Government spending down while increasing the amount of money Americans can keep growing the economy, reigning in wasteful Government spending and balancing the budget.

Yep, compared to the current Administration, these are "extremist" views.

Carry on. :roll:
 
If you think that the Republicans of the last 8 years were "liberal", then you are so delusional that one could probably get a committal order on you.
You DO know that a "Neoconsevative" is a liberal with an aggressive, pro-American foerign policy, right?
 
When Bush ran, he clearly told people what he wanted to do.
Bush was open about it.

He even made a bunch of Libs gag when he professed that Christ was the world's greatest philosopher.


Bush said he was a "compassionate conservative. He lied.
Bush said he would fight for the environment. He lied
Bush said he would not engage in military adventurism or nation building. He lied.

Now list for me how Obama has violated his campaign promises.
 
He did run on a clear agenda twice.

I am waiting for a specific liberal answer to the contrary. tick... tick... tick...

The Bush Administration was the master of call it one thing, do another:

Healthy Forest Initiative = "More logging in National Forests"

Clear Skies Initiative = "Weakening Environmental Enforcement"

He ran in 2000 against national building and thats all he tried to do upon taking office.

He ran on reducing federal spending and he grew the budget faster than any other president other than FDR and Reagan.
 
He did run on a clear agenda twice.

.

I can think of one from the 2000 Republican Platform about getting more people health insurence through a privatized system. That one really worked out great huh?
 
He ran on reducing federal spending and he grew the budget faster than any other president other than FDR and Reagan.
And The Obama will make him look like Scrooge.
 
You DO know that a "Neoconsevative" is a liberal with an aggressive, pro-American foerign policy, right?

No, anymore neoconservative is a conservative that courts the religious right and advocates a Utopian interventionist foreign policy.

Bill Krystal is a Neo-Conservative.

Ted Kennedy is a Liberal.

There is very little at all that the two men agree on. It's not just foreign policy that differentiates them.
 
No, anymore neoconservative is a conservative that courts the religious right and advocates a Utopian interventionist foreign policy.
You'd like to think that.
But then, those afflicted with BDS generally reject reality and substitute their own.
 
WHITE HOUSE PLAN TO TORPEDO LIMBAUGH

Paul Begala, a close friend of Carville, Greenberg and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel

Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party, a full-scale effort first hatched by some of the most familiar names in politics and now being guided in part from inside the White House.

The strategy took shape after Democratic strategists Stanley Greenberg and James Carville included Limbaugh’s name in an October poll and learned their longtime tormentor was deeply unpopular with many Americans, especially younger voters. Then the conservative talk-radio host emerged as an unapologetic critic of Barack Obama shortly before his inauguration, when even many Republicans were showering him with praise.

Soon it clicked: Democrats realized they could roll out a new GOP bogeyman for the post-Bush era by turning to an old one in Limbaugh, a polarizing figure since he rose to prominence in the 1990s.

Limbaugh is embracing the line of attack, suggesting a certain symbiosis between him and his political adversaries.

Rush Job: Inside Dems' Limbaugh plan - Jonathan Martin - POLITICO.com

In today's show Limbaugh responded by offering a challenge to Barack Obama to debate him one-on-one!

You'll be hearing more about this major escalation of the feud.
 
WHITE HOUSE PLAN TO TORPEDO LIMBAUGH

Paul Begala, a close friend of Carville, Greenberg and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel



Rush Job: Inside Dems' Limbaugh plan - Jonathan Martin - POLITICO.com

In today's show Limbaugh responded by offering a challenge to Barack Obama to debate him one-on-one!

You'll be hearing more about this major escalation of the feud.

My question is...should they be doing something productive for the country now that they are in power rather than still running a dirty campaign after supposedly winning so big?
 
Bush said he was a "compassionate conservative. He lied.
Bush said he would fight for the environment. He lied
Bush said he would not engage in military adventurism or nation building. He lied.

Now list for me how Obama has violated his campaign promises.

If you ignore Bush's programs for the aged and making schools better, reaching across the aisle and passing bi-partisan legislation; then yes, you may be right he wasn't compassionate.

If you dumb down the meaning of environmentalism to the most rabid defense of the environment in an attempt to remove private property rights and common sense; then yes, you may be right he didn't fight for radical environmentalism.

If you pretend 9-11 never happened and ignore the agreements Saddam signed and defied for a decade and his admission that he wanted his enemies to believe he had WMDs; then yes, you may be right that he tried to make the world a better place by removing the Taliban and Saddam Hussien which the coalition had the legal right to do.

Now if you are a rabid partisan hack who continues to blather the forum with abject empty headed arguments in a vacuum of reality and the historic facts, then yes, you would make the comments you have above.

Carry on; I look forward to more of your wild eyed hysterical claims which are much like the fringe Left we see plastered all over the internet. Your desperate desire to reduce the forum debate IQ to the lowest common denominator have been noted. :roll:
 
In today's show Limbaugh responded by offering a challenge to Barack Obama to debate him one-on-one!
The Obama will never agree to this.

However, if The Obama is as right as He thinks He is, He should jump at the chance.

Further, if The Obamnistas and The Obamanation are so sure of The Secular Meesiah, they should urge Him to take Limbaugh on.
 
Rush has just offerd to not only fly obama for a one on one debate on his show, but has offered to pay for it......


And thanked Obama for elevating his popularity.... :lol:
 
Rush has just offerd to not only fly obama for a one on one debate on his show, but has offered to pay for it......

And thanked Obama for elevating his popularity.... :lol:

Yes. The clear winner in all of this is Rush. Undeniably.
 
My question is...should they be doing something productive for the country now that they are in power rather than still running a dirty campaign after supposedly winning so big?

Great question!

Shades of Nixon's Enemies List! :shock:

Rush says if they really want to get rid of him they will agree to the debate with Obama or ANY representative of his Administration. They can shut Rush up for good, he suggests.

He will send his own jet to fly them to Florida for the debate.

Heh.
 
Back
Top Bottom