• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UAE bars entry for Israeli tennis player

And now it is the right of the WTA to pull their license to host a WTA tournament, which is something that may happen from next year unless the Abu Dhabi government repents and sees the error of its ways.

For for a professional athlete who was qualified to compete in a tournament that the government of the country lobbied heavily to host on an annual basis as Dubai hosts this event?

I am sure they had been working on the visa issue, but apparently the denial only became "final" very recently. As for making it political, the UAE government made it political with the denial of the visa. The WTA president was merely taking them to task for it and I am sure noting that this could result in the loss of the tournament - just as Venezuela lost IBAF sanction for a youth world championship last year for denial of visas to Asia's baseball champions because they happened to come from a country they don't like. Simply pathetic that you would somehow excuse such behavior.
Could it be just another propaganda attack in the never ending war between Israel and the Arab world? Another pathetic attempt to claim "anti-Semitism" because the person "wronged" comes from Israel? You can deny it as much as you want, but that is how it has come off, even though you never used the words.

So let me summarize.. Yes it is wrong for the UAE to say no to this player, but it is their right to do so, just like every other country does it on a daily basis.

If I were running the WTA, the UAE would become persona non gratta in the WTA arena.

No license, no players, no contact period. The UAE has proven they are to racist to host tournements.

The UAE needs to be banned outright. They want to play games then let the games be played where their racist asses are not allowed.
 
Unless you're a Palestinian living in Gaza. Then the comparison to apartheid might seem pretty reasonable.

Even if a Palestinian thinks it's reasonable, it is an inaccurate description of the situation. It's not apartheid. Sorry, but that's the fact.
 
Last edited:
It is just a freaking tennis player [one whom i have never even heard of]

People need to chill and quit bitchin if a soverign country has refused to allow someone access to it's territory.
If it makes anyone feel better, Israel can refuse a Arab tennis player :roll:
 
It is just a freaking tennis player [one whom i have never even heard of]

People need to chill and quit bitchin if a soverign country has refused to allow someone access to it's territory.
If it makes anyone feel better, Israel can refuse a Arab tennis player :roll:
and Israel can as well lose the priviledge to host such an event :shrug:
 
and Israel can as well lose the priviledge to host such an event :shrug:

Oh yeah ....
Oh well, UAE may lose it's priviledge as well.

This much fuss over a tennis player. Wow.
 
And they US has banned people from entering the US... remember Cat Stevens? and in the US case it is a huge majority muslims...? The UK just banned "the" dutch politician from entering the UK because of his racist views.. Countries do it all the time. But in this case people are up in arms because it is a jew? Give me a break.

The UAE can ban anyone they want from entering their territory, just like anyone else.

I remember being quite pissed off when Cat Stevens was denied entry into the US.
 
If someone can be banned from WTA competition because they are Jewish what is next? Banning the Williams sisters because they are black? Banning Sania Mirza because she is Muslim? Banning Raphael Nadal because he is left-handed?

or deporting people because they're Palestinian?
 
You accuse me and others for being hypocrites and assholes? How about looking in the mirror... Is it not a bit hypocritical to post this story, and yet not the other situations when people have been denied visa to enter a country? Is it not hypocritical to post a story who's intent was clearly to stir up sympathy for the poor Israeli against the mean old Arab country, and yet claim that religion and race has nothing to do about it? Again, why is it you find this story so important over random person being denied entry to any country on the planet?
.


You are correct. I work in corporate business travel and visas get denied all the time, for whatever reason- mostly political. Many countries deny visas for someone who even has an Israeli stamp on their passport, we have to recommend they get a second passport to gain entry if they want to get in. It's pretty stupid and petty but it's the discretion of the country to allow entry if they require visas to get in.
 
That is quite an ironic comment if you think about it.

Especially when it's the people who are supposed to have a "higher standard" who start flaming
 
It is just a freaking tennis player [one whom i have never even heard of]

People need to chill and quit bitchin if a soverign country has refused to allow someone access to it's territory.
If it makes anyone feel better, Israel can refuse a Arab tennis player :roll:

Abu Dhabi's decision puts her at a competitive disadvantage vis a vis other players on the tour. Dubai lobbies heavily for international tournaments. They should follow international norms while hosting them or expect to lose said tournaments.

As for your having never heard of her - it is irrelevant. She is a top-50 player and thus qualifies via her ranking.
 
You are correct. I work in corporate business travel and visas get denied all the time, for whatever reason- mostly political. Many countries deny visas for someone who even has an Israeli stamp on their passport, we have to recommend they get a second passport to gain entry if they want to get in. It's pretty stupid and petty but it's the discretion of the country to allow entry if they require visas to get in.

Fine. But once again, we are talking about a country that has been working hard to become the sports capital of the region and lobbies heavily for the right to host international sporting contests. They should be expected to uphold international standards, including the granting of visas. They will likely lose this tournament in the future, and as I have said earlier, Doha will be the big winner in all of this. They have allowed Peer to compete there in the past.

link

Peer broke barriers last year in Qatar when she was the first Israeli to play in a WTA Tour tournament in the Persian Gulf. But the UAE - locked in a rivalry with Qatar to host major sports events - could face setbacks if the WTA and other federations grow skittish of planning events with the prospect of Israeli athletes being blocked.

link

Dubai, 16 Feb. (AKI) - As the world's top tennis players began to taking part in the Dubai Tennis Championships, there was speculation that next year's tournament may be cancelled after a diplomatic dispute over the participation of Israeli tennis player, Shahar Peer.

Doha is a fabulous host. They hosted the best Asian Games in history in 2006 (A performance Guangzhou will be very hard pressed to match next year) and host other international events and have not had this kind of controversy regarding Israeli athletes.
 
how dare anyone criticize Israel, ever.

Israel should be treated exactly like South Africa was.

Why? Because Israel is an apartheid? Because the citizens of Israel suffer like the citizens of South Africa did? Need I really blast this pathetic attempt to brand Israel maliciously erroneous? You people and your labels. You disrespect everything just to try to criticize what you hate.

You want to know why nothing gets fixed in this world? Because haters are too busy exaggerating the issues just to try and make a point. Problem is that this strips all credibility from the critics and protestors.
 
And they US has banned people from entering the US... remember Cat Stevens? and in the US case it is a huge majority muslims...? The UK just banned "the" dutch politician from entering the UK because of his racist views.. Countries do it all the time. But in this case people are up in arms because it is a jew? Give me a break.

The UAE can ban anyone they want from entering their territory, just like anyone else.

Uh-oh..... The European cry for surface talk. Time to scratch the surface.....

1) Cat Stevens..er..."Yusuf Islam" : According to a statement by Yusuf Islam, the man on the list was named "Youssef Islam", indicating that Yusuf Islam himself was not the suspected terrorism supporter. "No reason was ever given, but being asked to repeat the spelling of my name again and again, made me think it was a fairly simple mistake of identity. Rumors which circulated after made me imagine otherwise."

2) Muslims immigration to America? "Immigration from these regions slowed considerably after Sept. 11. Fewer people were issued green cards and nonimmigrant visas. By 2003, the number of immigrants arriving from 22 Muslim countries had declined by more than a third. BUT starting in 2004, the numbers rebounded. The tally of people coming to live in the United States from Bangladesh, Turkey, Algeria and other Muslim countries rose by 20 percent, according to an analysis of Census Bureau data. BUT five years later, as the United States wrestles with questions of terrorism, civil liberties and immigration control, Muslims appear to be moving here again in surprising numbers, according to statistics collected by the Department of Homeland Security and the Census Bureau."

So what do we have here? A European attempt to lie or deceive? Maybe just a slip of the tongue, because bashing the English speaking nations taste so good? Your example shows a man that was denied based on his name (terrorist watch list), for which he was later removed. And the immigration thing? Got a defense for that one? And a man not allowed to enter a nation, based on his racist ways, must have been quite obvious as to his intentions in life.

But what I find tragically amusing is that somehow, you are able to compare the reasons these two individuals were denied entry to a case where an individual was denied entry based on...what? Being a Jew? Same thing?

It's no wonder most of the European Jews were massacred off or run out in the twentieth century so easily and without very much fuss. You are all too busy creating excuses and finding ways to look away. From an Olympic tragedy to this event, the Arab world is more than prepared to keep a Jew down. Seems some Europeans and Arabs have something in common again.
 
Last edited:
Need I really blast this pathetic attempt to brand Israel maliciously erroneous?

Oh, why wait for an answer......


False claims are historical for Arabs when dealing with Israel and the West, but anything that smears the Jews (especially Isrealis) is welcome entertainment to the outside for many.

So Israel is an apartheid like South Africa, huh?

1) In a state practiciing apartheid, would Arab Muslims legislators wield veto power over anything?

2) At only 20 percent of the population, would Arabs even be eligible for election if they squirmed under the thumb of apartheid?

3) Would an apartheid state extend voting rights to women and the poor in local elections, which Israel did for the first time in the history of Palestinian Arabs?

4) Would the vast majority of Arab Israeli citizens turn out to vote in national elections, as they've usually done?

5) Would an apartheid state have several Arab political parties, as Israel does?

6) Would the judiciary be free of political interferences? In the 2003 Israeli elections, two Arab parties found themselves disqualified for expressly supporting terrorism against the Jewish state. Israel's supreme court overturned both disqualifications.

7) Would an apartheid state award its top literary prize to an Arab? Israel honored Emile Habibi in 1986.

8) Would an apartheid state encourage Hebrew-speaking schoolchildren to learn Arabic?

9) Would road signs throughout the land appear in both languages?

10) Would an apartheid state be home to universities where Arabs and Jews mingle at will, or apartment blocks where they live side by side?

11) Would an apartheid state bestow benefits and legal protections on Palestinians who live outside of Israel but work inside its borders?

12) Would human rights organizations operate openly in an apartheid state? They do in Israel. In fact, every year the prime minister responds on the record to the report of Israel's leading human rights groups.

13) Would an apartheid state's media debate the moral rectitude of national policies?



You see, the joke here is how Arabs try their hardest to criticize and falsly accuse Israel of all these evil dastardly things. It's too bad they don't extend that same effort towards their own governments and ask why they can't be treated as Muslims are in Israel. They are too busy focusing on the betrayed that they are blind to who is doing the betraying. And sad part of this grand joke is how some westerners flock and gravitate towards anything that might criticize Israel as they claim to actually care for Palestinians. No matter the lie or exaggeration, always you will find the same type of figure seeking to get in a dig.
 
There are countries that won't allow Palestinians in either... let's not paint Israel as the only victim here. The heated political nature of the conflict in the West bank has polarized opinions all over the world. Even some governments have taken sides when it comes to their entry policies. We should not be surprised.

Think back to WWII... people entering nations with German passports were heavily scrutinized, and many not even allowed entry. The same was true of the Japanese. Anytime there is a well-known war, people take sides, and governments are comprised of people too.
 
As for your having never heard of her - it is irrelevant. She is a top-50 player and thus qualifies via her ranking.

I don't care what her ranking is, i don't even care if she continues to get refused.
It is not on my list of things to whine about. You'd think someone died. It is just ONE tennis player. Her being Israeli means nothing to me, i wouldn't care if it was a British tennis player refused.
 
this much fuss over state sanctioned racism ;)

Oh well, i would bet alot there is some form of racism and predjudices within every government in this world. That is life.
 
The Tennis Channel will not televise the Barclays Dubai Tennis Championships this week to protest the United Arab Emirates’ refusal to grant an entry visa to the Israeli player Shahar Peer. Peer was scheduled to play Anna Chakvetadze in the first round.

“This is an easy decision to come by, based on what is right and wrong,” Ken Solomon, the chairman and chief executive of the network, said Monday from Utah.

“Sports are about merit, absent of background, class, race, creed, color or religion. They are simply about talent. This is a classic case, not about what country did what to another country. If the state of Israel were barring a citizen of an Arab nation, we would have made the same decision.”

Tennis Channel Won’t Televise Dubai Event in Protest

Good call.
 
Uh-oh..... The European cry for surface talk. Time to scratch the surface.....

1) Cat Stevens..er..."Yusuf Islam" : According to a statement by Yusuf Islam, the man on the list was named "Youssef Islam", indicating that Yusuf Islam himself was not the suspected terrorism supporter. "No reason was ever given, but being asked to repeat the spelling of my name again and again, made me think it was a fairly simple mistake of identity. Rumors which circulated after made me imagine otherwise."

2) Muslims immigration to America? "Immigration from these regions slowed considerably after Sept. 11. Fewer people were issued green cards and nonimmigrant visas. By 2003, the number of immigrants arriving from 22 Muslim countries had declined by more than a third. BUT starting in 2004, the numbers rebounded. The tally of people coming to live in the United States from Bangladesh, Turkey, Algeria and other Muslim countries rose by 20 percent, according to an analysis of Census Bureau data. BUT five years later, as the United States wrestles with questions of terrorism, civil liberties and immigration control, Muslims appear to be moving here again in surprising numbers, according to statistics collected by the Department of Homeland Security and the Census Bureau."

So what do we have here? A European attempt to lie or deceive? Maybe just a slip of the tongue, because bashing the English speaking nations taste so good? Your example shows a man that was denied based on his name (terrorist watch list), for which he was later removed. And the immigration thing? Got a defense for that one? And a man not allowed to enter a nation, based on his racist ways, must have been quite obvious as to his intentions in life.

But what I find tragically amusing is that somehow, you are able to compare the reasons these two individuals were denied entry to a case where an individual was denied entry based on...what? Being a Jew? Same thing?

It's no wonder most of the European Jews were massacred off or run out in the twentieth century so easily and without very much fuss. You are all too busy creating excuses and finding ways to look away. From an Olympic tragedy to this event, the Arab world is more than prepared to keep a Jew down. Seems some Europeans and Arabs have something in common again.

why do you need to attack him based on his origins, and not just debate about what he says?
 
They should be expected to uphold international standards, including the granting of visas. They will likely lose this tournament in the future, and as I have said earlier, Doha will be the big winner in all of this. They have allowed Peer to compete there in the past.
.


I agree and think they should loose this tournament. Maybe that's what it will take for their government to realize how childish and stupid their visa stipulations are.
 
why do you need to attack him based on his origins, and not just debate about what he says?

Because he's a racist?

Seriously...

Some people are mentally incapable of making that separation.
 
It is just a freaking tennis player [one whom i have never even heard of]

People need to chill and quit bitchin if a soverign country has refused to allow someone access to it's territory.
If it makes anyone feel better, Israel can refuse a Arab tennis player :roll:


You need to quit defending the racist actions of a racist arab nation.
 
Back
Top Bottom