• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Key Witnesses to Be Interviewed in Prosecutor Firings

ADK_Forever said:
What an absolutely absurd argument! Do you use that same logic to state that if a tree falls in the forest, and nobody is around to hear it, that that proves it doesn’t make any noise. Oi vey! :roll:

You guys are intentionally making this about the actual act of “firings” when you know full well that...
THAT is not the issue.

The issue is about whether the administration attempted to force those AGs to conduct their offices with politics in mind. THAT is illegal!

If this happened under Carter then it too was illegal. Just because no legal action was taken only proves one thing... that no legal action was taken! Period! :doh If I go faster than the speed limit and pass by a cop but, he doesn't pull me over and issue me a ticket ... THAT does NOT mean that I did NOT break the law! Wow! :roll:

And, as I also pointed out, it is against “the rules” for Congressmen and women to contact AGs about “ANY” investigations. To do so may result in “obstructing justice” accusations. That’s sort of serious stuff! Just ask that treasonist liar Scooter Libby.

For someone who accuses others of "running away" from issues you're doing a nice job of it yourself now! :2wave:
Click to expand...

Tell you what . . . state, with particularity, the laws which were broken (you know, title, chapter, section) and then show the facts which establish the elements of the crime.

Can you? It would shut everyone up right here, right now.
 
Harshaw said:
Tell you what . . . state, with particularity, the laws which were broken (you know, title, chapter, section) and then show the facts which establish the elements of the crime.

Can you? It would shut everyone up right here, right now.
Click to expand...

14 USC 23

Being a Repukelicant Fascist

18 USC 73

Doing something that I think is bad

25 USC 7

Obstructuring justice
 
RightinNYC said:
Look, it's incredibly obvious that you're out of your element. If you read the above posts, you will see very clearly that nothing that happened was against the law, save possibly the perjury allegations, if true. If you don't understand the law, don't try to tell everyone what it means. If you don't understand what legal words mean, don't use them. The fact that you don't understand this is not an indication that the rest of us are wrong.
Click to expand...

The idea that because YOU THINK that your word is the final word here, and we peons should bow to your opinion, is as entertaining as Bush claiming to be a "compassionate" anything. :doh

What is obvious to the rest of us is that YOU are the one who doesn't know what he's talking about. Spare me your act of righteous indignation. Acting is obviously not your forte. :doh

When this investigation indicts someone, I will be happy to accept your apology. Until then, I'll just give your posts the attention they deserve. :mrgreen:
 
Harshaw said:
Tell you what . . . state, with particularity, the laws which were broken (you know, title, chapter, section) and then show the facts which establish the elements of the crime.
Click to expand...

That has already been done.

Can you? It would shut everyone up right here, right now.
Click to expand...

I doubt it. The right wingers in here wouldn't accept that any of Don Bush's admin broke any laws even if they wrote it in their bible and had it notarized... in blood! :roll: :mrgreen:
 
ADK_Forever said:
That has already been done.
Click to expand...

Where?


I doubt it. The right wingers in here wouldn't accept that any of Don Bush's admin broke any laws even if they wrote it in their bible and had it notarized... in blood! :roll: :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

And you wouldn't believe that they didn't.
 
ADK_Forever said:
The idea that because YOU THINK that your word is the final word here, and we peons should bow to your opinion, is as entertaining as Bush claiming to be a "compassionate" anything. :doh
Click to expand...

I'm not asking you to take what I'm saying as true, I'm asking you to provide me with evidence that it's not. ACTUAL evidence, not "oh its obstructurifying justice!"

When this investigation indicts someone, I will be happy to accept your apology. Until then, I'll just give your posts the attention they deserve. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

That's probably the nicest thing you could do for me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom