• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Working moms look to Michelle Obama for change

Harry Guerrilla

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
28,951
Reaction score
12,422
Location
Not affiliated with other libertarians.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Working moms look to Michelle Obama for change | U.S. | Reuters

CINCINNATI (Reuters) - Maternity leave. Affordable child-care. Flexible work arrangements. When first lady Michelle Obama said she wanted to help working women balance career and family, American moms applauded -- and immediately came up with a wish-list of policy changes.

The list of demands from working parents in the United States is long, in part because family policies lag far behind most industrialized nations.


There is no paid maternity leave mandated in the United States, a situation shared by only three other countries: Papua New Guinea, Swaziland, and Liberia, according to a 2007 study by Harvard and McGill universities.

"I've heard mothers in some European countries get paid to stay home," said Fleming, somewhat incredulously. "I don't see that happening, companies (here) don't value it as much."


"I work, my husband works, and child-care is like $1,500 a month for an infant. That's crazy. You can hardly afford to work and pay the bill," Fleming said.

Beth Myers Graham, a 36-year-old mother of two and full-time environmental consultant, said the government's current $5,000 a year tax credit for child-care should be increased to reflect the real cost of care.

"Anyone who has one child knows that doesn't even cover that child's care, let alone additional children," she said.

These people want companies to pay them for chosing to have a baby and want the government to pay for their childcare.

Personal responsibility, out the window.
 
Yeah what's wrong with them, how could they possibly give into their biological instincts at a time like this!

Well, I mean it is a choice after all. Why not plan ahead and pay your own way. No, that is way to much to ask.

Make your employer and the government do the planning for you. That makes much more sense.
 
Working moms look to Michelle Obama for change | U.S. | Reuters

These people want companies to pay them for chosing to have a baby and want the government to pay for their childcare.

Personal responsibility, out the window.

I think paid maternity leave should be mandated for employees who've worked for companies for a certain period of time under the condition that on their return they are not eligible for any pay raise the company might have had DURING the time they left. It's reasonable. And makes everybody happy.
 
I think paid maternity leave should be mandated for employees who've worked for companies for a certain period of time under the condition that on their return they are not eligible for any pay raise the company might have had DURING the time they left. It's reasonable. And makes everybody happy.

That is an excellent idea. I would not mandate it but would support that more than just a blanket "you must pay them."

I think people are sometimes under the impression that having a baby is an involuntary medical condition like a heart attack.
 
That is an excellent idea. I would not mandate it but would support that more than just a blanket "you must pay them."

I think people are sometimes under the impression that having a baby is an involuntary medical condition like a heart attack.

Well it's been my experience that very few companies/employers offer paid maternity/paternity leave without any kind of condition. However I do think that IF companies are going to be obligated to offer maternity/paternity leave that they get something in return when the employees come back to rejoin the work force.
 
Well it's been my experience that very few companies/employers offer paid maternity/paternity leave without any kind of condition. However I do think that IF companies are going to be obligated to offer maternity/paternity leave that they get something in return when the employees come back to rejoin the work force.

I could seriously support that.
Work mans compensation only pays 2/3rds of your regular pay if I'm not mistaken.

Why would an employer be forced to pay full compensation for a voluntary medical condition.
 
Europeans, on average, have a great maternity leave program.

I still think we have to adopt some of those. You're fighting with human nature whenever you force someone to chose baby or no baby, or work or no work.
 
Europeans, on average, have a great maternity leave program.

I still think we have to adopt some of those. You're fighting with human nature whenever you force someone to chose baby or no baby, or work or no work.

How is that? I'm asking for people to think about what happens when you have children, before they have the children.

If you want to have children save enough money for those weeks you will be absent and the problem is solved.
 
How is that? I'm asking for people to think about what happens when you have children, before they have the children.

If you want to have children save enough money for those weeks you will be absent and the problem is solved.

Human nature is not this whole fictional concept of time, working for money, or planning.
The body is not rational. It is based on instincts and the more you refuse the instincts the more, in most cases, it will push toward it.
 
Human nature is not this whole fictional concept of time, working for money, or planning.
The body is not rational. It is based on instincts and the more you refuse the instincts the more, in most cases, it will push toward it.

I certainly realize this.
I know to that the other side of that in human instinct is that when someone else sees a person living off of their dime, they tend to get pissed.
Should that person follow their instinct and take it back by force?

So do you suggest we try to embrace all instincts whether or not they be inferior?

If companies are forced to pay for maternity leave they will simply hire less women.
Staffing companies are going to be popular in the near future i foresee.
 
While the US doesn't have mandatory paid maternity leave, we do have FMLA. Further, a majority of women are offered paid maternity leave by their employers.

I'm inclined to say it should be more, but I think using the European model as an example is a pretty horrible idea.

Sweden is one country which provides generous parental leave: all working parents are entitled to 16 months paid leave per child, the cost being shared between employer and State.

...


Norway also has similarly generous leave. In Estonia mothers are entitled to 18 months of paid leave, starting up to 70 days before due date. Fathers are entitled to paid leave starting from the third month after birth (paid leave is however available to only one parent at a time). The amount paid depends on wages earned during previous calendar year - most will receive 100% or full wage but there is an upper limit of three times national average.

The maternal-leave only system in Bulgaria is even more generous, providing mothers with 45 days 100% paid sick leave prior the due date, 2 years paid leave, and 1 additional year of unpaid leave. The employer is obliged to restore the mother to the same position upon return to work. In addition, pregnant women and single mothers cannot be fired.

That's just insane.
 
While the US doesn't have mandatory paid maternity leave, we do have FMLA. Further, a majority of women are offered paid maternity leave by their employers.

I'm inclined to say it should be more, but I think using the European model as an example is a pretty horrible idea.



That's just insane.

That is what I'm afraid of.

Something like that and the extension of the statute of limitations on pay discrimination that was signed into law, could make women less desirable employees.
 
Holy crap. It's welfare, only they're calling it something else. Wonderful.
 
Well, I mean it is a choice after all. Why not plan ahead and pay your own way. No, that is way to much to ask.

Make your employer and the government do the planning for you. That makes much more sense.
Arch Enemy is probably unemployed or has never paid any taxes. He seems to wallow in govt benefits to everyone regardless of the insanity of it. People like this have no idea what America is about and why people want to come here.
 
Arch Enemy is probably unemployed or has never paid any taxes. He seems to wallow in govt benefits to everyone regardless of the insanity of it. People like this have no idea what America is about and why people want to come here.

I'm not going to speculate about Arch's employment history but I do understand why he feels the way he does.

It comes from his heart, which I can sympathize with that even though I disagree.

At times I know I come off as a real ass about being upset about programs like this.
I'm trying spread the message, that its time for us to evolve past people who don't want to take care of themselves.

With every choice in life comes the consequences and responsibilities.
If you want to have children you must also bear the burden of completely providing for them and yourself.
 
Back
Top Bottom