• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence

How many infraction points am I sitting on right now? Damnit...well the proper response for this post will get me suspended so I'll water it down this time.

Are you trying to deviate the presentation of facts that the gas chambers never existed by declaring me a holocaust denier?
Stop right there. There are no "facts" that definitively state the gas chambers never existed. You need to stop wielding this bald faced lie right now.

Is that all the best you can do? Excuse me but you are falling in the arms of fanatiscism and stupid pride if you cannot understand first what is the primeval meaning of the word "holocaust".

holocaust: Definition from Answers.com
How you could assume that Tashah of all people doesn't know the root origins of the word "holocaust" boggles the mind. How long have you been a member here? This tact is weak at best and indicates that you are stooping to a level of debate that is severely lacking in merit. This isn't even substantial enough to be considered a red herring. It's a simple diversion wrapped up in an insult.

As far as it is known, the burning of DEAD bodies by Germans was made to avoid the spread of diseases and not so by sacrificing the bodies to any God.
Patently false. That is a common myth propagated by the likes of Mattagno, Leuchter, and Faurisson. It's been debunked not only by eyewitness testimony but by the release of the Death Books. The Typhus Myth is just that, a myth. It's apparent that you put no credibility in eye witness accounts when their stories are backed up by evidence. How about the German soldiers who testified to the existence of gas chambers and systematic execution of innocent? What about the reports of the Polish underground during the war that detailed mass extermination of prisoners? What about the findings of the Institute for Forensic Research which clearly establish evidence of gas chamber use? How about the numerous survivors who testified about falsifying death certificates to read "heart attack, heart failure, influenza, diarrhea?'

Further, nobody ever said that this was a sacrifice to any God. Holocaust was an appropriate application of the word in describing what happened to the Jews during the Nazi attempt at wiping out the European Jews. They were murdered by the millions and a symbol of that process were the ovens in which the bodies were disposed of. Hitlers campaign of murder against the Jews was definitely one of genocidal proportions...the intent was there. The ovens came to symbolize the destruction of the Jews under his reign.

Oh, and ignore the number 2 definition because such is a lie,
Why does this not surprise me?

Thanks for the lesson, but where in this discussion did anyone display a lack of understanding of that word.


As far it is known, there is not a single evidence that such was the intentions of the Germans,
Are you serious? You are a denier, without a doubt. Research the "Final Solution" why don't you. Debunk the evidence surrounding that and get back with us.

otherwise the only thing they needed was to kill with their guns the Jews right there in the cities.
Google Einsatzgruppen. :roll:

Why did they had to preserve them in concentration camps?
For the same reason they faked the death certificates of tens of thousands of registered prisoners and failed to register millions of others. Even the Nazi's knew they couldn't just flaunt genocide to the world. Hitler's plan was to restore Germany to a place of world prominence, to avenge her fall from grace after World War 1. Unlike Stalin, who killed with wanton abandon out of paranoia, Hitler actually thought he could reach a plateau of sort in which he was viewed as some kind of respectable supreme ruler. It was his deep rooted hatred of the Jews, his failed understanding of tactics, and his misguided strategic vision that ruined him. At some point the German leadership knew they would have to answer as to where those prisoners went. The problem was there were too many of them and they were forced to begin killing them and disposing of their bodies as quickly as they could. Who knows why they chose gas chambers over bullets? We know that cremation was quickly realized as a better solution than mass graves because the thousands of corpses were tainting water supplies and causing serious health issues for the soldiers and those in surrounding areas. Further cremation destroyed evidence that would indicate a mechanism of death. This goes hand in hand with falsifying death records.

The whole thing makes no sense when you imply that the Germans wanted to "exterminate" the Jews from the world.
They wanted to exterminate the European Jews more than anyone else. Here you are adding a pound of sand to the argument in order to circle around some semblance of a point. And your logic of "that's not how I would have done it" has no merit in this argument.

On the other hand, it is a more clear picture of what happened when you can see pictures of Jews in concentration camps at the beginning of the war, the Jews were having even weddings and sport tournaments inside them! Come on, where are your "extermination goals"?
Irrelevant given the fact that millions were systematically murdered...taken to camps, not registered, and then disappeared never to be heard from again. Where did they go? Since we don't have any brand new massive communities of Jews popping up in Africa or Asia, and we do have death camps with execution blocks, gas chambers, and large multi-baffled furnaces with ovens that were very efficient in destroying human remains to the tune of hundreds if not thousands a day all across Europe...well I think you see where this is going.

At the end of the war, as Germany was loosing the war, the common sense event is that there was no more food to feed the people inside the concentration camps, then, people started to become sick and they were dying by starvation and or diseases. The only way to avoid contamination was to burn the bodies.
This is a complete fraud. You are taking a situation that already has an established and proven explanation and trying to come up with an alternative explanation based upon logic alone, sans actual supporting evidence. Yes some died of disease, some died of starvation, but many many more were executed. Yet evidence (both scientific and eyewitness testimony) clearly debunks this.

Look at here in US, the US government ALSO put lots of Japanese people in concentration camps, if the US government was to kill them, they should do it as soon the Japanese in detention put their feet inside those camps.
Many prisoners were killed immediately upon their arrival at places like Auschwitz. Try again and this time leave out the irrelevant red herrings and focus on what the Nazi's actually did (that thing you are trying your level best to deny).

Now, I will tell you this, if US was to loose the war and it happenee a great shortage of food, the ones who will suffer first are the Japanese in the US concentration camps because the government will apply to the motto "Americans first". The Germans just used the same motto.
This is absurd. You have absolutely now historical reference to base this on and are only making it up in order to lend substance to your story.

It is not anyone's fault but the mischievous attitude from some people who took advantage of the winning of the war by the allies and invented lots of tales about what the Germans did in the war.
So the revisionist accuses everyone else of revisionism. Nice. That's it? Basically you're argument is "we aren't lying, the eye witnesses are lying, the death books are fabrications, the evidence is tainted, the evidence is manufactured to further the lie of the Holocaust." Well then I'll debunk your denial of the Holocaust with this...You Are A LIAR! I win.

And again, reason won't be in your side with your silly attitude of calling me "holocaust denier" because you must learn what the word "holocaust" means in the first place before posting more stories based in ignorance of the language.
And you have never heard of a word with one or more similar or dissimilar meanings have you? Your stupid line of attack here won't work Denier.

I'll hope you have the evidence proving the use of gas in those rooms which have been proven already never been used as gas chambers, not only by the lack of gas residual but also by the clear spaces between doors and windows with their frames which present big gaps causing leaks.
Oh this is just precious. Gaps in doors and windows you say? How about the hundreds of people each year who die in old drafty homes from carbon monoxide poisoning? You are building a defense around the myth that you need sealed tight enclosures to facilitate killing people with poisonous gas. That is a lie, all you need is a tent, time, and no way for them to get out of the tent. Many people have died while camping by falling asleep in a tent with generator exhaust seeping in while they were asleep.

Put twenty people in a room, with leaky windows and doors, and begin pumping in carbon monoxide (from a gasoline burning engine exhaust) or cyanide and see what happens. They panic, they breath deeply from screaming, and speed the effects. It's quite efficient.

As long as you don't provide the scientific evidence that the gas chambers existed, your whole story tale is scientifically considered as a hoax.:coffeepap
Sorry but the burden of proof is on you to debunk the multitude of eyewitness accounts from survivors, soldiers serving in the camps, and the mountains of evidence supporting the claim.

You are calling these people liars. People who were there and participated to one degree or another and survived to give their accounting.

You'll not get away with this on this board. Go to Stormfront if this is what you want to engage in. I find your antics here disgusting.
 
Last edited:
Glad to see you're here. I wish you had posted something relevant/factual/accurate, but I guess I will have to go with what you posted.


Are you trying to deviate the presentation of facts that the gas chambers never existed by declaring me a holocaust denier? Is that all the best you can do? Excuse me but you are falling in the arms of fanatiscism and stupid pride if you cannot understand first what is the primeval meaning of the word "holocaust".

holocaust: Definition from Answers.com



As far as it is known, the burning of DEAD bodies by Germans was made to avoid the spread of diseases and not so by sacrificing the bodies to any God.

Please provide evidence of this fact.

Oh, and ignore the number 2 definition because such is a lie, read what the word genocide mean.

We should never pay attention to lying holocaust deniers such as yourself. Definition #2 is spot on.

As far it is known, there is not a single evidence that such was the intentions of the Germans, otherwise the only thing they needed was to kill with their guns the Jews right there in the cities. Why did they had to preserve them in concentration camps? The whole thing makes no sense when you imply that the Germans wanted to "exterminate" the Jews from the world.

Plenty of evidence. Here's one piece just to whet your appitite for the destruction that you will endure if you choose to debate me on this:

From Joseff Goebells diary:

February 14, 1942: The Führer once again expressed his determination to clean up the Jews in Europe pitilessly. There must be no squeamish sentimentalism about it. The Jews have deserved the catastrophe that has now overtaken them. Their destruction will go hand in hand with the destruction of our enemies. We must hasten this process with cold ruthlessness.

March 20, 1942: Finally we talked about the Jewish question. Here the Fuehrer is as uncompromising as ever. The Jews must be got out of Europe, if necessary by applying the most brutal methods.

March 27, 1942: The procedure is a pretty barbaric one and not to be described here more definitely. Not much will remain of the Jews. On the whole it can be said that about 60 per cent of them will have to be liquidated whereas only 40 per cent can be used for forced labor.

It is interesting that since the Nazis estimated that there were 11 million Jews in Europe at the time, 60% of that would be 6.6 million, pretty close to the actual figure.

This is the tip of the iceberg. There are plenty of Nazi records that quantify the deaths of Jews. Denying those facts is nothing more than prejudice and bigotry...along with lying and ignorance. I see nothing in your posts, conquer, that do not show that you are all of these adjectives.

On the other hand, it is a more clear picture of what happened when you can see pictures of Jews in concentration camps at the beginning of the war, the Jews were having even weddings and sport tournaments inside them! Come on, where are your "extermination goals"?

The numbers don't lie, but you do.

At the end of the war, as Germany was loosing the war, the common sense event is that there was no more food to feed the people inside the concentration camps, then, people started to become sick and they were dying by starvation and or diseases. The only way to avoid contamination was to burn the bodies.

Wrong. It was common sense to destroy the evidence by killing as many in concentration camps as possible. Fewer witnesses to tell of the heinous acts the Nazi's committed. The Nazi's were cowards. They knew the war was going to be lost, and they knew they were going to go on trial for human rights violations. They wanted to try to save their hides...and, at the same time, continue with their "Final Solution".

Look at here in US, the US government ALSO put lots of Japanese people in concentration camps, if the US government was to kill them, they should do it as soon the Japanese in detention put their feet inside those camps. Now, I will tell you this, if US was to loose the war and it happenee a great shortage of food, the ones who will suffer first are the Japanese in the US concentration camps because the government will apply to the motto "Americans first". The Germans just used the same motto.

No, they didn't. The focus was to destroy the Jews from the beginning. But since you have presented this "revisionist" history, let's see some substantiation for it. Present your evidence.

It is not anyone's fault but the mischievous attitude from some people who took advantage of the winning of the war by the allies and invented lots of tales about what the Germans did in the war.

There is plenty of evidence showing what the Germans did. Only liars who have no contrary evidence like you, deny this. Present your evidence.

And again, reason won't be in your side with your silly attitude of calling me "holocaust denier" because you must learn what the word "holocaust" means in the first place before posting more stories based in ignorance of the language.

It is you that does not know what the word "holocaust" means. Just because you deny the definition, doesn't mean the definition doesn't apply. You do not get to alter word definitions because they do not adhere to your lying agenda.

Come on, conquer. If you are so sure of your position, post your evidence. Prove it to us.

I'll hope you have the evidence proving the use of gas in those rooms which have been proven already never been used as gas chambers, not only by the lack of gas residual but also by the clear spaces between doors and windows with their frames which present big gaps causing leaks.

As long as you don't provide the scientific evidence that the gas chambers existed, your whole story tale is scientifically considered as a hoax.:coffeepap

You do realize that Leuchter has been completely debunked on scientific grounds. So, I hope you have more to put into the skillet than just that, because if that's all you've got, you are going to bore me, real quick.

But please, offer some evidence of what you claimed. Show us substantiation that that the gas chambers could not have been used as such. It's been a while since I've annihilated a lying holocaust denier, so please, show us your evidence, rather than just spewing your lies.
 
The reason why holocaust deniers are so easily debunked and shown to be liars is because what they do is reverse historical engineering. They come up with the premise they want to prove and then they manipulate facts and theories to prove their premise. This is precisely how NOT to conduct valid, reliable science. This is why they are easily prove liars and why they rarely present any actual evidence; there is none.
 
I wish I had proofed my post just one more time...lol. I hate it when mistakes get by like that, but I got my point across.

To CC, Don, and Tashah..excellent posts and thank you for deconstructing this mountain of lies that conquer has been telling. The coffin is nailed shut on this revisionist bull****. I seriously get sick feelings in my stomach when I read Holocaust deniers rantings. Something must be seriously off center to simply dismiss the horrors that befell the Jews during Hitler's reign.

Thank you all again and never let these people get away with this on these boards.
 
Reports: Holocaust Denier Ousted by Argentine Seminary.

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina — A Roman Catholic bishop whose denials that the Holocaust ever happened led to Vatican demands he recant has been removed as the head of an Argentine seminary, local media reported Sunday, citing a Catholic official.

The ultraconservative Society of St. Pius X has dismissed Bishop Richard Williamson as director of its seminary in La Reja, outside Buenos Aires, according to independent Argentine news agency Diarios y Noticias and the newspaper La Nacion.

The news outlets reported receiving a statement Sunday from the society's South American superior, Father Christian Bouchacourt, announcing the British bishop's removal. Seminary officials and Bouchacourt could not immediately be reached to confirm the reports.

Hammer time, bitch. The Vatican better fall in line here and be done with this dick.
 
Last edited:
The two fools, Williamson, and the Iranian president are not worth the time and trouble....
 
The two fools, Williamson, and the Iranian president are not worth the time and trouble....

Really though...how much effort is there in bitch slapping an idiot? It's therapeutic really.
 
I want every catholic to swear an oath saying they accept the holocaust happened, admit that the pope didn't end WWII, and apologize for the dark ages.

Until then it is an institution of intolerance and hatred.
 
One more interesting piece on the gas chambers issue. The IHR (Institute for Historical Review...or as I like to refer to them, the Institute for Historical Lying) offered $50,000 to anyone who could prove that Jews were gassed in gas chambers. When a man named Mel Mermelstein offered proof, the IHR refused to pay him. Mr. Mermelstein then sued the IHR in court. After a trial, and reviewing information, the Judge issued this statement:

"Under Evidence Code Section 452(h), this court does take judicial
notice of the fact that Jews were gassed to death at the Auschwitz
Concentration Camp in Poland during the summer of 1944" and "It just simply
is a fact that falls within the definition of Evidence Code Section 452(h).
It is not reasonably subject to dispute. And it is capable of immediate
and accurate determination by resort to sources of reasonably indisputable
accuracy. It is simply a fact."

Mermelstein was awarded the $50,000 ($90,000, actually) and the IHR was forced to apologize.

Now, along with the debunking of the anti-science of the Leuchter Report, the Goebells diary, and the Mermelstein verdict, I think we've pretty much destroyed any possibility of conquer looking credible, not only from an evidenciary standpoint, but from the fact that he has provided no evidence...nor has any to provide. But, if more is needed, I can certainly do so.
 
Yeah, the Holocaust was a hoax and Germany paid all those reparations as a coverup. :roll:
 
Scientifically speaking, the holocaust has been declared as a hoax! :coffeepap

Except for:

1. Nothing you say is scientific, so its more accurate to say "crack pot conspiracy theorist speculation speaking"

2. Its only been declared a hoax by nutjobs, not legitimate sources.

Ok, here I am.

Now, lets respond first to Tahash.



Are you trying to deviate the presentation of facts that the gas chambers never existed by declaring me a holocaust denier? Is that all the best you can do? Excuse me but you are falling in the arms of fanatiscism and stupid pride if you cannot understand first what is the primeval meaning of the word "holocaust".

holocaust: Definition from Answers.com



As far as it is known, the burning of DEAD bodies by Germans was made to avoid the spread of diseases and not so by sacrificing the bodies to any God.

Oh, and ignore the number 2 definition because such is a lie, read what the word genocide mean.

genocide - Dictionary definition and pronunciation - Yahoo! Education



As far it is known, there is not a single evidence that such was the intentions of the Germans, otherwise the only thing they needed was to kill with their guns the Jews right there in the cities. Why did they had to preserve them in concentration camps? The whole thing makes no sense when you imply that the Germans wanted to "exterminate" the Jews from the world.

On the other hand, it is a more clear picture of what happened when you can see pictures of Jews in concentration camps at the beginning of the war, the Jews were having even weddings and sport tournaments inside them! Come on, where are your "extermination goals"?

At the end of the war, as Germany was loosing the war, the common sense event is that there was no more food to feed the people inside the concentration camps, then, people started to become sick and they were dying by starvation and or diseases. The only way to avoid contamination was to burn the bodies.

Look at here in US, the US government ALSO put lots of Japanese people in concentration camps, if the US government was to kill them, they should do it as soon the Japanese in detention put their feet inside those camps. Now, I will tell you this, if US was to loose the war and it happenee a great shortage of food, the ones who will suffer first are the Japanese in the US concentration camps because the government will apply to the motto "Americans first". The Germans just used the same motto.

It is not anyone's fault but the mischievous attitude from some people who took advantage of the winning of the war by the allies and invented lots of tales about what the Germans did in the war.

And again, reason won't be in your side with your silly attitude of calling me "holocaust denier" because you must learn what the word "holocaust" means in the first place before posting more stories based in ignorance of the language.

I'll hope you have the evidence proving the use of gas in those rooms which have been proven already never been used as gas chambers, not only by the lack of gas residual but also by the clear spaces between doors and windows with their frames which present big gaps causing leaks.

As long as you don't provide the scientific evidence that the gas chambers existed, your whole story tale is scientifically considered as a hoax.:coffeepap

So essentially your extremely long rant about Tashah calling you a denier proves that....you're a denier.

Good to know.

I'd go forward refuting you but seriously, the others have done a bang up job of that already.
 
Well here. I'll show you. I provide sources backing my opinion. You can try and ignore them or address them. But I have a gut feeling that like most revisionist you'll provide some diversion to avoid the topic.



So your argument is that you can't come up with an argument? Noted. Have fun being a revisionist. I will not help you by going on some mystery egg hunt. :2wave:

If you actually looked at SOME of the primary source documents, you would know that the Catholic Church, at the behest of the Pope, saved Jews all over Catholic Europe. The Pope himself opened up Castle Gandolfo in order to shelter Jews. You can lie all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that the Church systematically assisted as many Jews as was in its power to help.

BTW, your side is the revisionist side because after WWII, the Church was widely acclaimed for its assistance to Jews during the crisis.
 
I want every catholic to swear an oath saying they accept the holocaust happened, admit that the pope didn't end WWII, and apologize for the dark ages.

Until then it is an institution of intolerance and hatred.

Apologize for the Dark Ages? You honestly think the CHurch brought on the Dark Ages? You truly are delusional in your hatred for the Church.

It was the BARBARIANS who overthrew Rome who brought about the Dark Ages and the Church who held Europe together during it and actually helped bring Europe OUT OF IT!!! Please, read and get an education. Thank you.
 
Apologize for the Dark Ages? You honestly think the CHurch brought on the Dark Ages? You truly are delusional in your hatred for the Church.

It was the BARBARIANS who overthrew Rome who brought about the Dark Ages and the Church who held Europe together during it and actually helped bring Europe OUT OF IT!!! Please, read and get an education. Thank you.

Wasn't it the church that had a problem with alchemy. And no I'm not talking about turning led to gold I'm talking about the origins of western chemistry.
 
Wasn't it the church that had a problem with alchemy. And no I'm not talking about turning led to gold I'm talking about the origins of western chemistry.

You are claiming it. You cite it. THen we can go on from there.

Don't forget the contributions the CHurch has made to education, literacy, the preservation of literature and knowledge, science, and a whole host of other disciplines.
 
If you actually looked at SOME of the primary source documents, you would know that the Catholic Church, at the behest of the Pope, saved Jews all over Catholic Europe. The Pope himself opened up Castle Gandolfo in order to shelter Jews. You can lie all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that the Church systematically assisted as many Jews as was in its power to help.

BTW, your side is the revisionist side because after WWII, the Church was widely acclaimed for its assistance to Jews during the crisis.

Where are these sources that say that Castel Gandolfo was used as a Jew hide-out.
They don't have it on the Gandolfo's main site.

Apologize for the Dark Ages? You honestly think the CHurch brought on the Dark Ages? You truly are delusional in your hatred for the Church.

It was the BARBARIANS who overthrew Rome who brought about the Dark Ages and the Church who held Europe together during it and actually helped bring Europe OUT OF IT!!! Please, read and get an education. Thank you.

The Church has a great deal it has to apologize for. However, I do not accept their apologies. Why?

Not because I am a bad person.
Not because I hate Catholics.
Not because I am directly affected by their past mistakes.

but because there are some things that "i'm sorry" doesn't work for. If they were to truly try and make amends, then I will accept nothing less than their reparations made in the form of no longer being a secret organization; reveal w.t.f is in their archives. I will also accept the following:

Personal Addresses to everyone affected by the Inquisition, the Crusades, The slaying of "heretics", and those who suffered in death camps while the Pope kept a "neutral" official position.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/anti-semitism/pius.html said:
Pope Pius XII's (1876-1958) actions during the Holocaust remain controversial. For much of the war, he maintained a public front of indifference and remained silent while German atrocities were committed. He refused pleas for help on the grounds of neutrality, while making statements condemning injustices in general. Privately, he sheltered a small number of Jews and spoke to a few select officials, encouraging them to help the Jews.

How can anyone have faith whenever the religious leader is committing the greatest crime against humanity: Indifference.
 
If you actually looked at SOME of the primary source documents, you would know that the Catholic Church, at the behest of the Pope, saved Jews all over Catholic Europe. The Pope himself opened up Castle Gandolfo in order to shelter Jews. You can lie all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that the Church systematically assisted as many Jews as was in its power to help.

BTW, your side is the revisionist side because after WWII, the Church was widely acclaimed for its assistance to Jews during the crisis.

So still nothing to provide but an Easter egg hunt? Noted. Ludahai the Denier dismissed.
 
If you actually looked at SOME of the primary source documents, you would know that the Catholic Church, at the behest of the Pope, saved Jews all over Catholic Europe. The Pope himself opened up Castle Gandolfo in order to shelter Jews. You can lie all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that the Church systematically assisted as many Jews as was in its power to help.

BTW, your side is the revisionist side because after WWII, the Church was widely acclaimed for its assistance to Jews during the crisis.

But here. I'll shed some light on your Castel* Gandolfo

CNS STORY: Reconciliation with Jews a hallmark of John Paul's papacy

In Miami, the pope repeated the promise he made at Castel Gandolfo, that the Vatican would publish a Catholic statement on the Holocaust and anti-Semitism.

Even that document, issued with a papal introduction 11 years later, drew mixed reaction.

It won universal approval for its "mea culpa" about past Christian discrimination against the Jews and its strong condemnation of the practices and ideas that led to the Nazis' "final solution."

But many Jewish leaders said they were disappointed with the document's distinction between Christian "anti-Judaism" and Nazi "anti-Semitism" and its defense of Pope Pius XII's policies during World War II.

Vatican Apologizes To Jews; Church Cites Failings In Fighting Holocaust | Article from The Washington Post | HighBeam Research

The Roman Catholic Church formally apologized today for failing to take more decisive action in challenging the Nazi regime during World War II to stop the extermination of more than 6 million Jews.

But in a long-awaited document on the church's role in the Holocaust, the Vatican defended Pope Pius XII, who headed the church during the war, from accusations that he turned a blind eye to the systematic killing of Jews. Some critics say Pius was motivated by church religious prejudices dating back to the death of Jesus Christ.

France 24 | Jewish leaders condemn revisionist bishop's rehabilitation | France 24

Uneasy relations between the Vatican and Israel have been further strained by plans to declare Nazi-era Pope Pius XII a saint, despite widespread criticism of his inaction during the Holocaust.

The controversy, which has lingered for decades, resurfaced in October as the pontiff defended the memory of his wartime predecessor and said he wanted him beatified soon -- a first step towards declaring him a saint.

Vatican spokesman Federico Lombardi said recent controversial statements by Williamson, 68, were a separate issue.

Want to keep going? I can do this all night. I looooooooooove mentally destroying revisionists like yourself.
 
How many infraction points am I sitting on right now? Damnit...well the proper response for this post will get me suspended so I'll water it down this time.


Stop right there. There are no "facts" that definitively state the gas chambers never existed. You need to stop wielding this bald faced lie right now.

In science you never ever will use "statements of witness" against evidence, and science IS my witness.


How you could assume that Tashah of all people doesn't know the root origins of the word "holocaust" boggles the mind. How long have you been a member here? This tact is weak at best and indicates that you are stooping to a level of debate that is severely lacking in merit. This isn't even substantial enough to be considered a red herring. It's a simple diversion wrapped up in an insult.

The insult is the misuse of the word "holocaust" because the dead bodies were burned to prevent plagues and not so to exterminate people.


Patently false. That is a common myth propagated by the likes of Mattagno, Leuchter, and Faurisson. It's been debunked not only by eyewitness testimony but by the release of the Death Books. The Typhus Myth is just that, a myth. It's apparent that you put no credibility in eye witness accounts when their stories are backed up by evidence. How about the German soldiers who testified to the existence of gas chambers and systematic execution of innocent? What about the reports of the Polish underground during the war that detailed mass extermination of prisoners? What about the findings of the Institute for Forensic Research which clearly establish evidence of gas chamber use? How about the numerous survivors who testified about falsifying death certificates to read "heart attack, heart failure, influenza, diarrhea?'

See? You want to use the statements of witness which favored the tales, , and such is not only irrelevant but also there were 1 million of Germans soldiers ready to testify that such gas chambers never existed, and they were not heard. So, the use of witness from your part is debunked again.

Further, nobody ever said that this was a sacrifice to any God. Holocaust was an appropriate application of the word in describing what happened to the Jews during the Nazi attempt at wiping out the European Jews. They were murdered by the millions and a symbol of that process were the ovens in which the bodies were disposed of. Hitlers campaign of murder against the Jews was definitely one of genocidal proportions...the intent was there. The ovens came to symbolize the destruction of the Jews under his reign.

Hold your horse right there, you are talking about the killing of millions of Jews without showing any valid evidence. Sorry but your statement still void by the scientific point of view. And, the word "holocaust" it does imply sacrifice by fire, and such didn't happen with the jews.

Thanks for the lesson, but where in this discussion did anyone display a lack of understanding of that word.

Now that you have reshaped your understanding of the meaning of words, you must change the words "holocaust" by "the burning of dead bodies to avoid diseases and plagues, plus you must change the word "genocide" by the word "slavery" because such is mostly the intentions to keep people in concentration camps: to be used for work.

Are you serious? You are a denier, without a doubt. Research the "Final Solution" why don't you. Debunk the evidence surrounding that and get back with us.

With "us"? How many are you?

For the same reason they faked the death certificates of tens of thousands of registered prisoners and failed to register millions of others.

And how do you know all that when you are practically saying that no accurate records are available at all?

Even the Nazi's knew they couldn't just flaunt genocide to the world. Hitler's plan was to restore Germany to a place of world prominence, to avenge her fall from grace after World War 1. Unlike Stalin, who killed with wanton abandon out of paranoia, Hitler actually thought he could reach a plateau of sort in which he was viewed as some kind of respectable supreme ruler. It was his deep rooted hatred of the Jews, his failed understanding of tactics, and his misguided strategic vision that ruined him. At some point the German leadership knew they would have to answer as to where those prisoners went.

Are you talking about the few thousands who were arrested? Because millions of people acquired false passports and traveled to all the parts of the world escaping from the war. Such a migration of millions of people is not recorded but just visit far away lands and high mountains in other countries and yes...they still there with their names changed but they still there.

The problem was there were too many of them and they were forced to begin killing them and disposing of their bodies as quickly as they could. Who knows why they chose gas chambers over bullets? We know that cremation was quickly realized as a better solution than mass graves because the thousands of corpses were tainting water supplies and causing serious health issues for the soldiers and those in surrounding areas. Further cremation destroyed evidence that would indicate a mechanism of death. This goes hand in hand with falsifying death records.

Your story is funny, Hitler didn't care about what people might think about him, the evidence is his invasions here and there, because in those years the Geneva Convention didn't exist at all and countries used to invade other countries and occupy their lands and kill any opponent...just look US in Hawaii or Israel in Palestine. It was the "law" of those times. Today you are criticizing Hitler with the new "international law", and sorry but such is not the right method.

They wanted to exterminate the European Jews more than anyone else. Here you are adding a pound of sand to the argument in order to circle around some semblance of a point. And your logic of "that's not how I would have done it" has no merit in this argument.

That is idiot's stories, Hitler needed the people of every country not so to kill them. His tactic was to destroy their defenses not so to kill populations. You must admire Attila the Hunt as your hero, but Hitler wasn't like that. I'm not saying that Hitler was a great thing as people, but he wasn't the sanguinary Dracula that you try to portrait about him. He was an ambitious man who acquired an extraordinary power as no other man has reached in human history, and I think that you are jealous of him because this reason.

Irrelevant given the fact that millions were systematically murdered...taken to camps, not registered, and then disappeared never to be heard from again. Where did they go?

That is not the question, the real question is "to what country they migrated escaping from Hitler?

Since we don't have any brand new massive communities of Jews popping up in Africa or Asia,

Check US, Canada and South America, Australia and even China and review birth certificates because many of them just changed names and became "Christians" to avoid further persecution, because in those years of the war they believed that Hitler was to dominate the entire world.

and we do have death camps with execution blocks, gas chambers, and large multi-baffled furnaces with ovens that were very efficient in destroying human remains to the tune of hundreds if not thousands a day all across Europe...well I think you see where this is going.

Yeap, to fantasy island, because such didn't happen in reality.


This is a complete fraud. You are taking a situation that already has an established and proven explanation and trying to come up with an alternative explanation based upon logic alone, sans actual supporting evidence. Yes some died of disease, some died of starvation, but many many more were executed. Yet evidence (both scientific and eyewitness testimony) clearly debunks this.

Disregard the witness testimony, here we are talking about facts as evidence, and you must show the facts otherwise your statements will become opinions only.

Many prisoners were killed immediately upon their arrival at places like Auschwitz. Try again and this time leave out the irrelevant red herrings and focus on what the Nazi's actually did (that thing you are trying your level best to deny).

Mostly the ones who didn't want to submit themselves to their new authority.

So the revisionist accuses everyone else of revisionism. Nice. That's it? Basically you're argument is "we aren't lying, the eye witnesses are lying, the death books are fabrications, the evidence is tainted, the evidence is manufactured to further the lie of the Holocaust." Well then I'll debunk your denial of the Holocaust with this...You Are A LIAR! I win.

The number of deaths in the books do no count more than few thousands, what the heck are you talking about?


And you have never heard of a word with one or more similar or dissimilar meanings have you? Your stupid line of attack here won't work Denier.

Denier, eh? well this "denier" knows English and you don't.

Oh this is just precious. Gaps in doors and windows you say? How about the hundreds of people each year who die in old drafty homes from carbon monoxide poisoning? You are building a defense around the myth that you need sealed tight enclosures to facilitate killing people with poisonous gas. That is a lie, all you need is a tent, time, and no way for them to get out of the tent. Many people have died while camping by falling asleep in a tent with generator exhaust seeping in while they were asleep.

You don't get it. The leaks should kill everybody inside the buildings, this means the gas killing also the Nazis who were inside in the other rooms. Do you have a brain? well, use it to think and not so to imagine stupid arguments.

Put twenty people in a room, with leaky windows and doors, and begin pumping in carbon monoxide (from a gasoline burning engine exhaust) or cyanide and see what happens. They panic, they breath deeply from screaming, and speed the effects. It's quite efficient.

Then, your point is that the Jews died by hysteria and not so by gas, sheeesss! now you have started a new theory...

Sorry but the burden of proof is on you to debunk the multitude of eyewitness accounts from survivors, soldiers serving in the camps, and the mountains of evidence supporting the claim.

Hell with those false witness, facts rules and no facts have been given by you.

You are calling these people liars. People who were there and participated to one degree or another and survived to give their accounting.

Yes, if the facts do not support their words, all those people are no more than liars. What do you expect?

You'll not get away with this on this board. Go to Stormfront if this is what you want to engage in. I find your antics here disgusting.

What I find disgusting is to see how a big lie like the killing of millions of people in concentration camps has been spread out without a single evidence supporting such thing. Today, thanks to science such a myth called the holocaust is finally proved as a hoax.:coffeepap
 
Last edited:
In science you never ever will use "statements of witness" against evidence, and science IS my witness.




The insult is the misuse of the word "holocaust" because the dead bodies were burned to prevent plagues and not so to exterminate people.




See? You want to use the statements of witness which favored the tales, , and such is not only irrelevant but also there were 1 million of Germans soldiers ready to testify that such gas chambers never existed, and they were not heard. So, the use of witness from your part is debunked again.



Hold your horse right there, you are talking about the killing of millions of Jews without showing any valid evidence. Sorry but your statement still void by the scientific point of view. And, the word "holocaust" it does imply sacrifice by fire, and such didn't happen with the jews.



Now that you have reshaped your understanding of the meaning of words, you must change the words "holocaust" by "the burning of dead bodies to avoid diseases and plagues, plus you must change the word "genocide" by the word "slavery" because such is mostly the intentions to keep people in concentration camps: to be used for work.



With "us"? How many are you?



And how do you know all that when you are practically saying that no accurate records are available at all?



Are you talking about the few thousands who were arrested? Because millions of people acquired false passports and traveled to all the parts of the world escaping from the war. Such a migration of millions of people is not recorded but just visit far away lands and high mountains in other countries and yes...they still there with their names changed but they still there.



Your story is funny, Hitler didn't care about what people might think about him, the evidence is his invasions here and there, because in those years the Geneva Convention didn't exist at all and countries used to invade other countries and occupy their lands and kill any opponent...just look US in Hawaii or Israel in Palestine. It was the "law" of those times. Today you are criticizing Hitler with the new "international law", and sorry but such is not the right method.



That is idiot's stories, Hitler needed the people of every country not so to kill them. His tactic was to destroy their defenses not so to kill populations. You must admire Attila the Hunt as your hero, but Hitler wasn't like that. I'm not saying that Hitler was a great thing as people, but he wasn't the sanguinary Dracula that you try to portrait about him. He was an ambitious man who acquired an extraordinary power as no other man has reached in human history, and I think that you are jealous of him because this reason.



That is not the question, the real question is "to what country they migrated escaping from Hitler?



Check US, Canada and South America, Australia and even China and review birth certificates because many of them just changed names and became "Christians" to avoid further persecution, because in those years of the war they believed that Hitler was to dominate the entire world.



Yeap, to fantasy island, because such didn't happen in reality.




Disregard the witness testimony, here we are talking about facts as evidence, and you must show the facts otherwise your statements will become opinions only.



Mostly the ones who didn't want to submit themselves to their new authority.



The number of deaths in the books do no count more than few thousands, what the heck are you talking about?




Denier, eh? well this "denier" knows English and you don't.



You don't get it. The leaks should kill everybody inside the buildings, this means the gas killing also the Nazis who were inside in the other rooms. Do you have a brain? well, use it to think and not so to imagine stupid arguments.



Then, your point is that the Jews died by hysteria and not so by gas, sheeesss! now you have started a new theory...



Hell with those false witness, facts rules and no facts have been given by you.



Yes, if the facts do not support their words, all those people are no more than liars. What do you expect?



What I find disgusting is to see how a big lie like the killing of millions of people in concentration camps has been spread out without a single evidence supporting such thing. Today, thanks to science such a myth called the holocaust is finally proved as a hoax.:coffeepap

I see nothing here but your falsehoods and lies. There is no science that backs you. You have posted no evidence, because there is none. You are a liar or you just believe in the anti-semetic fantasies that have been spoon fed to you by who knows whom. Go back to stormfront.
 
Where are these sources that say that Castel Gandolfo was used as a Jew hide-out.
They don't have it on the Gandolfo's main site.

"No fewer than three thousand Jews found refuge at Castel Gandolfo, the pope's summer residence." "... 477 ROman Jews were sheltered in the Vatican and its enclaves, "while another 4238 found refuge in the numerous monasteries and convents in Rome.

Rabbi Dalin (p. 83) from at least three different citings.


The Church has a great deal it has to apologize for. However, I do not accept their apologies. Why?

Not because I am a bad person.
Not because I hate Catholics.
Not because I am directly affected by their past mistakes.

If they don't affect you, then you shouldn't worry about them.

but because there are some things that "i'm sorry" doesn't work for. If they were to truly try and make amends, then I will accept nothing less than their reparations made in the form of no longer being a secret organization; reveal w.t.f is in their archives. I will also accept the following:

So, any "secret organization" owes an apology?

Personal Addresses to everyone affected by the Inquisition, the Crusades, The slaying of "heretics", and those who suffered in death camps while the Pope kept a "neutral" official position.

You are talking about the "Nazi Death Camps"? What did you want the POpe to do, so out, put on the SUperman uniform and snatch each and every Jew out of the camps? All of this while he was surrounded by Nazi Germany armies? How pathetic. If you look at even some of the documents released in the TWELVE VOLUMES of WWII-era documents released by the Vatican, you would realize the Church, at the direction of the Pope, worked to save HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF JEWS from the SHoah.



How can anyone have faith whenever the religious leader is committing the greatest crime against humanity: Indifference.

If you believe the Pope was indifferent during this calamity, you are badly informed.
 
Want to keep going? I can do this all night. I looooooooooove mentally destroying revisionists like yourself.

How do you account for the fact that Jews had a higher survival rate in countries with large Catholic populations rather than those where the Catholic Church wasn't as influential?

How to you account for the thousands directly shelted by the Vatican in Rome and its environs?

How do you account for the hundreds of Papal missives to Church representatives throughout Europe ordering them to save as many JEws as possible?

There is a lot you can't account for once you actually look at the PRIMARY source evidence.

I love the fact that haters like yourself won't even look at the history.

Please explain to me why newspaper articles in multiple languages PRAISED the work of the Church and Pope in working on behalf of Jews.

All you have is historical revisionism. When one looks at the documents of the day, it is clear the Church was working tirelessly on behalf of as many Jews as it could.
 
You are not only citing a Wikipedia article, you are citing a three-line "stub".

How much actually control of the Crusades do you think the Church actually had?

Fine attack the source. I really don't think there is much discussion here nor am I going to waste the effort since in your eyes the Catholic Church genuflected on.
 
Back
Top Bottom