AAAAAND exit polls are somehow now believable? Oh ok, I wasn't aware Kerry wasn't the pres for the last 4 years.
The poll is on Obama, Kerry has nothing to do. If you don’t have anything else more believable than the exit poll, you are simply in the state of denial. You want us to believe your fantasies and not to believe polls.
I did not have any polls, but simple observation shows that policies of democrats are attractable for people who not carry burden of taxes and who do not have education and experience. No polls needed all one has to do is to listen to Obama.
Again, will somebody please explain why the New England area is ALWAYS blue and yet is comprised of some of the wealthiest states in the nation? You can't have it both ways, either Democrats typically make less and as such pay less in taxes, or they make more and pay more in taxes. Just repeating the same mantra when its shown to be incorrect (see previous maps) is something we've been seeing for 8 years now. Do we really need to continue this?
Whatsoever you are missing the point, I started my point from making sure that the post was about those who do not carry the burden of taxes, - but not about who pays and who does not pay taxes or who makes /pays more.
Burden is a very heavy word – how democrats are capable of missing it I don’t know. A body of mine – a good hearted well educated liberal makes $200, 000 (I think), he pays $ 60,000 in ALL taxes, another body makes $ 200, and pays $40,000. The first one pays more, but another one carries the burden, because the first one has a family of 2 and another one a family of 4 and a child who requires a special care and a sister he has to help. How difficult is to understand this?
Whatsoever you are missing the point, living in CT and in the richest county, I still see that that policies of democrats are attractable for people how do not carry burden of taxes and who do not have education and experience. No polls needed all one has to do is to listen to Obama.
If to take
youngest – least experienced voters
voters who do not carry the burden of taxes
voters who have the least education
from Obama and democrats and to make them neutral or give them to republicans, democrats would never make it.
It is not the question of democrats paying lesser in taxes, although tax evasion promotes democrats to key financial positions in their government. It is that ideas and actions of democrats are attractive to
youngest – least experienced voters
voters who do not carry the burden of taxes
voters who have the least education
and democrats in order to keep on getting elected try to widen this base.
In my post I was pointing only to those who do not carry the burden of taxes. As to who pays more taxes – Democrats or Republicans - it belongs to the rest of the voters – of those who carry the burden of taxes, - it is another question, which was not raised by me. If to remove those who voted firstly because of racism from the rest we would have the more or less fair and reasonable rest, - and most likely democrats will not ever be in majority among reasonable voters, even here in CT. Even here I can see that hard working people, small business owners are not for democrats, when people with old money and Wall Street dealers of virtual money often finance Obama, - of course, it is not a rule without exclusions and some of my friends are good hearted liberals here. I meet a lot of people here – it is very difficult to say – but most of them are not pro-democrats at all, - but pro-reason, - when it comes to those who do not carry the burden of taxes, who is lost due to minimal experience in life, and who have lesser education, certainly democrats prevail greatly.. I hang out with hard working small business owners all the time, a lot of them are pissed off by Bush’s stimulus package – forgetting that Obama’s package is even worse; some of them do not see a big deal of trying Obama for a change – they have the idea that the US is set up in such a way that Obama cannot destroy it, that all this craziness is not anything new, - but in all of all they are not democrats at all. The story with Lieberman shows that CT is not ready yet to follow only money.
It looks like Democrats are more rich than Republicans, - looks like they have the greater difference in income between the top and the bottom of themselves. The top is willing to spend money to keep itself rich and to widen the base of their lowest income, gov-nt dependant, low educated voters. It seems that bring them more money. With Obama overspending McCain and all reasonable limits – one would be surprised if he didn’t win. As one can see Democrats are dependant on money spent on agitation and propaganda so much , that they cannot even think about limits. Democrats are driven by money and for money; they depend on uneducated inexperienced and not carrying the burden of taxes parts of the populations.