This is "debatepolitics", I am discussing the POTUS. I am sorry you want to do the liberal "Lets attack the Good Reverend" for daring to discuss dear leader.
Yes, this is debate politics. And if she feels that a point you're making is frivilous and not worthy of discussion her pointing it out is not "attacking" you. Just because
YOU or even I feel that a matter is legitimate doesn't mean others have to. Stating that you believe something is frivilous and thus you don't care about it IS a legitimate feeling and thought...NOT an attack on you.
And it is not the same. I have yet to call him the Socialist chimp, or other derogatory names. I am simply bringing up issues of his going back on his campaign promises, his picks, and his early policies.
And unlike left wingers over the last 8 years, when he does something right, like the recent EEO EO, and his slamming wall street bonuses, I applaud him....
Yes...yes...relating him to Kim Jong-Il repeatedly with your childish "Dear Leader" crap is certainly not a derogatory name, and I'm sure "The Messiah" is meant completely with endearment. Additionally, my post wasn't wasn't talking about you specifically, but the left in generald and the right on general. And those on the right HAVE been calling him a socialist, or calling him an "Obamanation", how about "Nerobama" I'm sure that term is meant to be endearing.
Guess what Reverend, you're not the entire Right. I'm not the entire Right. Yes, there are people on the right that ARE going after him for pointless, idiotic things, just like the left did. From sentiments like "OMG he had drinks and STEAK during a recession!?" to "I can't believe he had the nerve to use Kennedy books behind him in a speech!", there are pointless things being brought up by our side that are hardly even minor issues in my mind.
But everyone has a different view of what is an issue. The steaks weren't an issue to me, they were to you. Things that the left have brought up over the past 8 years may've included things that you thought wasn't an issue, I thought was a minor issue, and they thought was major. There's no universal rule on what is frivilous and what isn't, there's just opinion.
But it is an absolutely uniformed, blind position to say that those on the Right aren't going to complain about issue that people consider minor, and its the same uniformed, blind position to say those on the right haven't been saying derogatory attacking things about him on par with Facist Chimp.