- Joined
- Aug 26, 2007
- Messages
- 50,241
- Reaction score
- 19,243
- Location
- San Antonio Texas
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
No, I am saying AA is responsible for the injuries of the passengers that were injured.
It would be the same thing if it were a no fault accident where one of the passengers was injured in a taxi cab. The liability is greater because they were paying for safe delivery to their destination.
I don't see how AA can be responsible for an act of nature. That's not only silly it's ludicrous. The pilot did EVERYTHING right.
Had he... tried to land at a runway, and failed due to pilot error... he's at fault.
Crap like this makes me believe it's time to over throw the whole damned system.