• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lynn's Raytheon cash ties run deep

RightinNYC

RightinNYC

Girthless
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
25,893
Reaction score
12,484
Location
New York, NY
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Lynn's Raytheon cash ties run deep - Kenneth P. Vogel - Politico.com

Barack Obama's pick for top deputy at the Pentagon is in line for a payout of as much as $1.25 million in the coming weeks - for his work as a lobbyist for one of the nation's top defense contractors.

William Lynn’s nomination as deputy defense secretary already has come under fire from Democrats and Republicans because of his ties to Raytheon, where Lynn worked as a lobbyist -- a seeming violation of Obama’s pledge to keep lobbyist influence out of his administration.

Now Lynn’s financial disclosure statement, filed two weeks ago with the Office of Government Ethics, also reveals that his financial connections to the company are deeper than previously known.

Lynn reported earning $369,615 from Raytheon last year as a senior vice president, He also reported 6,000 shares of restricted company stock worth between $500,000 and $1 million that will vest in February – at a time when he would be on the Pentagon payroll.

Plus, the statement shows that Lynn’s 2008 cash bonus of as much as $250,000 - “pursuant to previously established bonus target formula” – is payable in March.
Click to expand...

This is a pretty identical situation to that of Cheney - he had Halliburton stock options that vested after he was already in office, and had received several payouts before then. The only difference is that all of Cheney's stock was in a blind trust, and he donated it all to charity. I'm curious to see whether Lynn is accused of being a tool for Raytheon for the next 4 years.
 
Not surprising in the slightest. If a big enough stink isn't raised by Obama's political opponents (who, by the way, partake in the same kind of actions), then he'll be accepted.
 
Khayembii Communique said:
Not surprising in the slightest. If a big enough stink isn't raised by Obama's political opponents (who, by the way, partake in the same kind of actions), then he'll be accepted.
Click to expand...

I'm still waiting for the stink to be raised by Obama's political supporters.
 
From what I can tell this appoinment doesn't violate the rules:

A lobbyist who joins the Obama administration also is forbidden from working on issues they previously were involved with, he said. Any person who leaves the administration will be barred from lobbying the government for two years.

Bloomberg.com: Worldwide
Click to expand...
 
I'm still waiting for the stink to be raised by Obama's political supporters.
Click to expand...

Some will oppose the move and others will rationalize it.

From what I can tell this appoinment doesn't violate the rules:
Click to expand...

"working on issues they previously were involved with". Raytheon is a defense contractor. The Pentagon has contracts with Raytheon. Lynn was lobbying for Raytheon.

EDIT:

Executive Order said:
"2. Revolving Door Ban All Appointees Entering Government. I will not for a period of 2 years from the date of my appointment participate in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to my former employer or former clients, including regulations and contracts.
Click to expand...
White House

This is what is blatantly violated, which is why they are trying to seek an exception for him.
 
Last edited:
Khayembii Communique said:
Some will oppose the move and others will rationalize it.



"working on issues they previously were involved with". Raytheon is a defense contractor. The Pentagon has contracts with Raytheon. Lynn was lobbying for Raytheon.

EDIT:


White House

This is what is blatantly violated, which is why they are trying to seek an exception for him.
Click to expand...


I still don't see the violation but I do think it will happen. I don't think it is the wisest choice in appointments either.
 
Last edited:
I still don't see the violation but I do think it will happen. I don't think it is the wisest choice in appointments either.
Click to expand...

How on earth can you not see it?

1. Lynn was a Raytheon lobbyist.
2. The Department of Defense has contracts with Raytheon.
3. The deputy secretary of defense has the ability to:

3.1.3. Establish performance goals and measures for improving and evaluating overall economy, efficiency, and effectiveness and monitor and measure the progress of the Department.
3.1.4. Develop and maintain a Department-wide strategic plan for business reform.
Source
Click to expand...
4. That is a direct violation of the aforementioned executive order.

Of course, I could also argue that since the DoD is a past client of Raytheon, Lynn would be violating the order by "participat[ing] in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to my... former clients."
 
Khayembii Communique said:
How on earth can you not see it?

1. Lynn was a Raytheon lobbyist.
2. The Department of Defense has contracts with Raytheon.
3. The deputy secretary of defense has the ability to:


4. That is a direct violation of the aforementioned executive order.

Of course, I could also argue that since the DoD is a past client of Raytheon, Lynn would be violating the order by "participat[ing] in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to my... former clients."
Click to expand...


I think it will be violated. Just appointing him is not a violation though. If he never has contact with Raytheon there will be no violation. That is not going to happen though.
 
Who cares if the appointment violates the EO or not? The EO can modified any time he wants to modify it.

The real issue is Obama abandoning a core political principle, i.e., bringing change to Washington by appointing new players and rooting out sorporate lobbyists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom