• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bashers End Bush Era Deflated by Lack of Prosecutions

ReverendHellh0und

ReverendHellh0und

I don't respect you.
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
79,903
Reaction score
20,981
Location
I love your hate.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Bashers End Bush Era Deflated by Lack of Prosecutions

Bashers End Bush Era Deflated by Lack of Prosecutions | Political News - FOXNews.com

Activists who have spent years protesting President Bush admit their chances are slim of seeing Bush or any members of his administration face legal recourse for what they say are "crimes against humanity."

Several activists hoped to squeeze out a few parting shots against the outgoing president in the run-up to President-elect Barack Obama's inauguration on Tuesday. Demonstrators are trying to organize final shows of force in the last hours before Obama becomes president.

But several planned anti-Bush events along Obama's whistle-stop train tour failed to pan out over the weekend.
Click to expand...



You gotta feel sorry for these nitwits. I mean really. It's over. "moveon". :lol:



I am going to miss one particular nutjob who would stand in front of numerous post offices with a crazy ass cart bemoaning the evils of Bush and cheney, What is he going to do now? :lol:
 
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
I am going to miss one particular nutjob who would stand in front of numerous post offices with a crazy ass cart bemoaning the evils of Bush and cheney, What is he going to do now? :lol:
Click to expand...
yes, what will he do now? now, that there is obviously going to be less evil in the executive branch to bemoan?

that particular "nutjob" will bemoan other evils, more than likely.
 
niftydrifty said:
yes, what will he do now? now, that there is obviously going to be less evil in the executive branch to bemoan?

that particular "nutjob" will bemoan other evils, more than likely.
Click to expand...
Oh, you already know the Obama administration, which hasn't even started.
 
American said:
Oh, you already know the Obama administration, which hasn't even started.
Click to expand...

no, I don't. I was directly referring to the statement made by reverend. he asked what will the guy do now? as if reverend knew there would be less evil. I'm taking his word for it.
 
niftydrifty said:
no, I don't. I was directly referring to the statement made by reverend. he asked what will the guy do now? as if reverend knew there would be less evil. I'm taking his word for it.
Click to expand...




Of course there will be less evil. He has come! :2razz:
 
If you accuse the president of crimes that can't be proven you should go to jail for treason. Plain and simple.
 
sazerac said:
If you accuse the president of crimes that can't be proven you should go to jail for treason. Plain and simple.
Click to expand...

We need to execute the prosecuters. :roll:
 
sazerac said:
If you accuse the president of crimes that can't be proven you should go to jail for treason. Plain and simple.
Click to expand...
You mean things like "Bush lied"?
 
sazerac said:
If you accuse the president of crimes that can't be proven you should go to jail for treason. Plain and simple.
Click to expand...

Except that it's not treason at all. You should identify an offense that actually fits the elements exercising your freedom of speech and try to make that one fit here.
 
sazerac said:
If you accuse the president of crimes that can't be proven you should go to jail for treason. Plain and simple.
Click to expand...

Like they do in Iran and North Korea?
 
American said:
So you're saying they do everything wrong, like we do everything right?
Click to expand...

Boy, you really ran with that one. How do you reach that kind of all encompassing conclusion from his one sentence?
 
Lerxst said:
Boy, you really ran with that one. How do you reach that kind of all encompassing conclusion from his one sentence?
Click to expand...
You're the one that threw NK and Iran out there. What's next, Nazi Germany?
 
American said:
You're the one that threw NK and Iran out there. What's next, Nazi Germany?
Click to expand...

I did? When did that happen? And by the way, since you brought it up again...that's exactly what North Korea and Iran do.

:2wave:
 
Wouldn't it be funny if they flew Bush straight to Gitmo? :lol:
 
independent_thinker2002 said:
Wouldn't it be funny if they flew Bush straight to Gitmo? :lol:
Click to expand...

No. Where's the humor in this? Gitmo is something you find despicable, no? Yet, apparently, it's not so despicable as to ship a former US President there?

You people have some psychological issues that psychology cannot begin to assess.
 
JMak said:
No. Where's the humor in this? Gitmo is something you find despicable, no? Yet, apparently, it's not so despicable as to ship a former US President there?
Click to expand...

It was a joke. You see, there is irony in it. I know you recognize it.

If Gitmo is fine, it's not so depsicable to ship a former US President there.

JMak said:
You people have some psychological issues that psychology cannot begin to assess.
Click to expand...

I won't waste my time or money then. Thanks.
 
independent_thinker2002 said:
It was a joke. You see, there is irony in it. I know you recognize it.
Click to expand...

No, I don't see the irony. Call me obtuse. Call me thick-headed. I just don't see it.

If Gitmo is fine, it's not so depsicable to ship a former US President there.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, curious thought. Gitmo is reserved for non-US citizens detained as enemy combatants and other specially-designated individuals. Why do you think it would be humorous to subject a US President to the despicable treatment you (at least others allege) allege is the norm there?

I won't waste my time or money then. Thanks.
Click to expand...

You're welcome.
 
JMak said:
No, I don't see the irony. Call me obtuse. Call me thick-headed. I just don't see it.



Hmmm, curious thought. Gitmo is reserved for non-US citizens detained as enemy combatants and other specially-designated individuals. Why do you think it would be humorous to subject a US President to the despicable treatment you (at least others allege) allege is the norm there?



You're welcome.
Click to expand...

Jose Padilla.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom