• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Student auctions off virginity for offers of more than £2.5 million

LMFAO good for her. But I see the usual suspects are in here all high and self-righteous, and ignorant. Typical. ;)

Dynamic said:
My comparison was going based on the fact that you are okay with people "selling" their bodies for personal gain. Monetary gain was the only form mentioned. Hence me saying I wonder how many of you who are okay with her selling her body for money, would be okay with her selling her body for drugs. Besides, money could still be used to buy drugs. Why would it matter that they would drop the money part and exchange directly for drugs. Would you be okay with her selling her body for education directly? Or would that be demeaning and wrong?
Click to expand...

Everyone sells "their bodies" if they work for a living. Any type of work requires a body to perform it. And no, I have no problem with anyone working for food, drugs, shelter, a ring on their finger... whatever they want.
 
Maximus Zeebra said:
I weep for the world all the time. This is just another example to fear the future of moral decay.
People, like morons they are cheer her on. :doh
Click to expand...

Huh? Moral decay? A few posts back you were the one talking about how sex with non virgins is much better due to they know what they are doing much more than a virgin. You seem to be a hypocrite:(
 
Kali said:
Huh? Moral decay? A few posts back you were the one talking about how sex with non virgins is much better due to they know what they are doing much more than a virgin. You seem to be a hypocrite:(
Click to expand...

Well, it was hard to get the gist of what he was saying, because he kept mumbling, blushing, and beating around the bush- no pun intended- but he seems to be laboring under the delusion that the more times a woman has sex, the looser her pooz gets. I guess married women who routinely have sex are positively knackered, in his scenario, while women who have had kids... well, you might as well just drag them out behind the barn and shoot them.
He doesn't seem to understand that poozies are stretchy, and dicks aren't really all that big.
He seems to believe that a vajay only has a certain number of uses in it, like a Bic lighter or a disposable razor, and after it's been used umpteen times it's finished and needs to be thrown away and replaced.
Which makes about as much sense as if one of us said, "Oh, that guy looks like a scumbag. He looks like he's had sex more times than most guys twice his age. I'll bet his dick's just all used up. It probably looks like a little shrivelled-up dog turd, and his nuts probably look like a couple of raisins. That's what happens to men when they whore around indiscriminately, you know. They get all ****ed-out, and pretty soon their business dries up and falls off."

I mean, this seems to be more or less the same mentality as the idea that one might actually be able to tell, by looking at a woman, by the condition of her vagina or by some other physical sign, how many men she has slept with.
:roll:
 
DeeJayH said:
I remember when this twat was on Howard Stern a while back
she got the idea from her sister who, IIRC, paid for her own masters by whoring herself out for just 3 weeks

while i have no respect for either, more power to 'em

would love to see how her future children feel when they read about it on the internet down the road:3oops:
Click to expand...

Calling her a twat says a lot about you because at least her and sister are doing something Positive with their life:(

I bet her future children will say thanks mom because she will have raised them with food on table, clothes on their backs and a strong push for them to get some education:cool:
 
Kali said:
Calling her a twat says a lot about you because at least her and sister are doing something Positive with their life:(

I bet her future children will say thanks mom because she will have raised them with food on table, clothes on their backs and a strong push for them to get some education:cool:
Click to expand...

What if she gets pregnant? Despite any precautions taken.
 
Maximus Zeebra said:
She do look like a whore, a woman who has had more sex than most people twice her age. She have that type of over ****ed look.. She would fit well among a bunch of hookers in a bordello, it would look like her natural habitat.
Click to expand...

Huh? Please give me a break down on what a whore "looks" like! I want you to be very exact and explain to me how you judge simply based on looks as to how a whore looks. I also wish for you to explain to me in great detail how you can determine that a female has had sex simply based on their looks.

I really look forward to hearing about how you can tell simply from pics on the interwebz how someone looks as if they have had more sex than most people twice their age. Thanks!
 
Bishop2 said:
(1st post glad to be here):2wave:

When I see her pictures and e-mail address here:
Meet Natalie Dylan...

I do not think she's a virgin.

I think this is a sham, and she'll get rich doing it.

:roll:
Click to expand...

As has been stated in the article she is willing to go through any tests the person wants in order to prove her virginity.
 
Kal'Stang said:
Thats up to her. She can keep it. She can have it aborted. She can put it up for adoption.
Click to expand...

Yep she can. Kinda seems like a real bummer were that to happen on the first time and more of a bummer since the virginity was sold.

It just seems awfully cold to me.
 
Kal'Stang said:
Thats up to her. She can keep it. She can have it aborted. She can put it up for adoption.
Click to expand...

She could also do the morning after pill just in case? I mean like the next day or whatever? Then no chance?
 
Last edited:
Kali said:
She could also do the morning after pill just in case? I mean like the next day or whatever? Then no chance?
Click to expand...

She probably won't need to. Most of the people in this country with 3.7 mil to spend on 1 night with a below average looking college student are too old to ejaculate anything other than dust and salt.
 
Queen Of Diamonds

"Queen Of Diamonds"
Monk-Eye said:
"Tuck: Her Case"
Hell; if desperate, however not ugly, not unclean, sober, and nonviolent, wanna buy someones consenting daughter?
Click to expand...
For marriage, that is.
 
Alex said:
What is not being understood here is the fact that morals are subjective, they do not necessarily hold true outside of a person's own mind.
Click to expand...

You're right, they don't. That's what laws are for.

Alex said:
Your morals are no better than anyone else's morals, just different. It is egotistical to think otherwise, and that is not grounds for stopping anyone from doing what they want as long as it does not harm anyone else.
Click to expand...

The bolded portion of this statement is your subjective moral opinion, which you are attempting to impose upon others by restricting them from using lawful means to discourage undesired behavior. I do not disapprove of this action on your part, save that I disagree with the specific moral standards that you are attempting to impose-- that is, the standard that as long as no third party can come forth and demonstrate injury, no third party may interfere in the conduct of two consenting adults.

I believe that society is more than the sum of its parts, more than the mass of individuals which comprise it. And I believe how those individuals behave, whether they are consenting adults or not, influences the health, strength, and fortunes of their families and communities, and those of the larger society that they belong to.

And I believe that prostitution is a foul business that degrades all participants-- customers and practitioners alike-- destroys families, and spreads disease. I have every right to seek the abolition of such a practice.

Alex said:
I applaud anyone who breaks with social norms, that is how a society moves forward.
Click to expand...

As has already been noted, that is also how society becomes degenerate.
 
dclxvinoise said:
So what? I still wouldn't call it "selling her body". She's selling sex, not her body. I've found that people who use the phrase "selling her body" only do so because they believe sex to be this intensely precious and personal thing. If that were true for everyone then there would be no prostitutes, swingers, **** buddies, etc.
Click to expand...

" I've found that people who use the phrase "selling her body" only do so because they believe sex to be this intensely precious and personal thing"

So what? I've noticed that those who are okay with it have no self respect. What's your point?
 
1069 said:
I wonder if these same people think you're "giving your body away for free" when you're just having sex and there's no money involved.
Does anyone really think of it in those terms?
When I have sex, I'm no more "giving my body away" than I'm taking somebody else's body away.
If something can't be given away, how can it be sold.
In fact, the original occupant of the body in question is still sovereign over the body, still the sole occupant, proprietor, and custodian of said body, monetary exchanges notwithstanding. There is no way to transfer ownership of one's body to someone else. You can't sell it, even if you wanted to. You can't even rent it out, because no matter what kind of sexual hijinx you get up to with another person, you- not they- are still the sole occupant of your body (and they're still the sole occupant of theirs).

One can't "sell one's body", unless one sells it to a medical school as a research cadaver... and then they can only collect it after one is already dead.

It's a dumb saying, "sell one's body".
it's alarmist, misleading, and false.
Click to expand...

That's interesting that you would not know that most people who think of sex in such a high regard do consider having sex as giving one self away. But not for free. It's a spiritual thing, and there is no real personal gain that is materializable.
You're taking "selling a body" as a literal sense.
It's not meant to be literal. You can sell ones body for a night or for an hour or for how long one see's fit. Usually prostitutes do sell their body--not just sex. Prostitutes are usually willing to perform almost any sex act (I know this is not always the case). In some cases they are expected to be extremely submissive while another perosn has their way with them.
What is sex exactly? How can one sell sex? Define sex in clear terms so it cannot be misconstued. Is sex only access to the vagina? It is only access to sexual organs? And what would you consider sexual organs since I've noticed a lot of women on here do not think breasts are considered in that catagory? What is the "product" you call sex in black and white? Since really, both terms selling sex, and selling your body both fall into a grey area.
 
Dynamic said:
So what? I've noticed that those who are okay with it have no self respect. What's your point?
Click to expand...

I have self respect thanks and i don't see why my morals or views should restrain what two consenting adults do. Hell if a man wants to pay and a woman wants to sell. Good for them! Keep it indoors and i don't mind.
Whilst we're at it, legalize prostitution.
 
rivrrat said:
LMFAO good for her. But I see the usual suspects are in here all high and self-righteous, and ignorant. Typical. ;)



Everyone sells "their bodies" if they work for a living. Any type of work requires a body to perform it. And no, I have no problem with anyone working for food, drugs, shelter, a ring on their finger... whatever they want.
Click to expand...

That's a good point. But I think it's wrong to have to work for money too. But that discussion would be getting a tad bit off topic.
 
Dynamic said:
" I've found that people who use the phrase "selling her body" only do so because they believe sex to be this intensely precious and personal thing"

So what? I've noticed that those who are okay with it have no self respect. What's your point?
Click to expand...

I think his point is kind of like the breastfeeding argument we had awhile back; some people may find breastfeeding (or sex) to be an intensely personal, intimate, special and beautiful experience to be shared privately with the one you love; others may view breastfeeding (or sex) differently and less sentimentally, as a biological function which is nothing more than a means to an end, such as to get your baby to quit whining (or, in the case of sex, to get some guy to quit whining, or to have an orgasm, or to burn 700 calories, or to kill time until Southpark comes on, or to earn 3 million dollars for graduate school). Some people take a sentimental view of such functions, while others take a more pragmatic view.
You can't force or compel others to view sex as a special and sacred act, any more than you could compel others to view breastfeeding as a special and sacred act.
The law can't force them to, either. Nobody can force them to.
While you might think that folks who don't take a sentimental view of such biological acts are lacking in self-respect, those people probably, conversely, think that those who don't view such acts pragmatically are big goofy drips. They have a different view of what's important in life. Different priorities. To some people breastfeeding (or sex) are not important things in and of themselves. To others, these acts are a chore, or a means to an end, the end being whatever such people do find important.
They don't have to agree with you about what's important in life.
I mean, as long as we're idealizing bodily functions, let's just declare that taking a crap is a special, intimate, and sacred act, and that if you don't treat it with the proper reverence, you've got low self-esteem. :roll:

Everything is subjective.
 
Last edited:
Laila said:
I have self respect thanks and i don't see why my morals or views should restrain what two consenting adults do. Hell if a man wants to pay and a woman wants to sell. Good for them! Keep it indoors and i don't mind.
Whilst we're at it, legalize prostitution.
Click to expand...

When did I say she should be stopped? Seriously. Did I say you had no self respect? No I did not. Reread my post. Take it how you want. But I clearly said I have noticed those who have no problem with it have no self respect. But that doesn't mean you don't. Or that other people don't. Just a majority really. There's always room for exceptions.
 
1069 said:
I think his point is kind of like the breastfeeding argument we had awhile back; some people may find breastfeeding (or sex) to be an intensely personal, intimate, special and beautiful experience to be shared privately with the one you love; others may view breastfeeding (or sex) differently and less sentimentally, as a biological function which is nothing more than a means to an end, such as to get your baby to quit whining (or, in the case of sex, to get some guy to quit whining, or to have an orgasm, or to burn 700 calories, or to kill time until Southpark comes on, or to earn 3 million dollars for graduate school). Some people take a sentimental view of such functions, while others take a more pragmatic view.
You can't force or compel others to view sex as a special and sacred act, any more than you could compel others to view breastfeeding as a special and sacred act.
The law can't force them to, either. Nobody can force them to.
While you might think that folks who don't take a sentimental view of such biological acts is lacking in self-respect, those people probably, conversely, think that those who don't view such acts pragmatically are big goofy drips. They have a different view of what's important in life. Different priorities. To some people breastfeeding (or sex) are not important things in and of themselves. To them, these acts are a chore, or a means to an end, the end being whatever such people do find important.
They don't have to agree with you about what's important in life.
Everything is subjective.
Click to expand...

Spot on, and you can't force people to think it's just selling sex either. It's a lose lose situation. I will agree to disagree.

I don't think they are lacking self respect. I have noticed most of them are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom