• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Student auctions off virginity for offers of more than £2.5 million

(1st post glad to be here):2wave:

When I see her pictures and e-mail address here:
Meet Natalie Dylan...

I do not think she's a virgin.

I think this is a sham, and she'll get rich doing it.

:roll:

:shrug:

Virginity is not really a physical state in the modern-day western world, anyway.
It's more just an ideal.
She'll get away with it provided no ex comes forward claiming to the media that he slept with her years ago.
Even in that event, though, it's his word against hers, as there probably weren't any witnesses even if it happened.
If she's not a virgin, and if she's smart, she'll preempt this by contacting every guy she's ever slept with and offering each of them a 1% cut to keep their mouths shut.
 
:shrug:

Virginity is not really a physical state in the modern-day western world, anyway.
It's more just an ideal.
She'll get away with it provided no ex comes forward claiming to the media that he slept with her years ago.
Even in that event, though, it's his word against hers, as there probably weren't any witnesses even if it happened.
If she's not a virgin, and if she's smart, she'll preempt this by contacting every guy she's ever slept with and offering each of them a 1% cut to keep their mouths shut.

Or she could just have a medical exam and prove her hymen is in-tact.

If she has has the surgery to repair that lil flap of skin that would be another issue lol.
 
It's not going to cost her $3.7 million to get her master's degree.

She should donate any excess to a home for wayward women.
 
Or she could just have a medical exam and prove her hymen is in-tact.

If she has has the surgery to repair that lil flap of skin that would be another issue lol.

Most females in western society don't have intact hymens by the time they have sexual intercourse. Since no particular importance is placed on hymens in our culture, no real effort is made to preserve them; girls have freedom of movement, are not constrained by restrictive garments, are active in sports, in horseback riding, they use tampons, they masturbate, they have gyn exams. I severely compromised my hymen in grade school, as a result of an unfortunate accident with a jungle gym. Another female forum member says the same thing happened to her, and most of the women i know have similar stories.
At best, most women only have partially intact hymens by the time they have sex for the first time (and conversely, many women retain partially intact hymens long after they've become sexually active; it's not like sex entirely obliterates it... although childbirth usually does).

But, true, if the person paying the 3m wanted a real virgin with a fully intact hymen, I suppose Natalie could always have hymenoplasty; it doesn't cost much, and can be done with only local anesthesia.
 
Last edited:
I agree with you: the face is better than the body.
.

I dont think her face looks that nice either, it looks "tight" in a way. I prefer women who are more relaxed and natural looking, cute and sweet, and I do not like so much make up.
Perhaps its the eyes I do not like. I dont know, just dont like the face that much.
 
:shrug:

Virginity is not really a physical state in the modern-day western world, anyway.
It's more just an ideal.
She'll get away with it provided no ex comes forward claiming to the media that he slept with her years ago.
Even in that event, though, it's his word against hers, as there probably weren't any witnesses even if it happened.
If she's not a virgin, and if she's smart, she'll preempt this by contacting every guy she's ever slept with and offering each of them a 1% cut to keep their mouths shut.

She do look like a whore, a woman who has had more sex than most people twice her age. She have that type of over ****ed look.. She would fit well among a bunch of hookers in a bordello, it would look like her natural habitat.
 
No, in that second pic, her face looks a little like mine when I was younger.

So where is your picture? Id rather like to see that.. I was viewing a picture post in "the tavern" where you had posted it, but it was gone!
 
So where is your picture? Id rather like to see that.. I was viewing a picture post in "the tavern" where you had posted it, but it was gone!

A picture of when I was young and looked a little like her?
I'm naked in it!! :2razz:

I'll see if I can find it.

*edit* I can't find it on my computer; I have it as a polaroid in my closet somewhere, but I don't have a scanner. Maybe tomorrow, if I feel up to it, I'll take a photo of the polaroid with my digital camera, and post that.
You'd probably think I looked like a whore, a monster, and the second-runner-up for the "worst person in the world" award, though, because- haha- I basically was. You'd probably say that you hoped I would get a disease, be harshly punished, and fall into a pit to hell and die.

I know your type.
 
Last edited:
I think its nasty to sell yourself for sex period. But hey, thats just me.
I wonder just how many of you who have no problem with women selling their bodies for money feel the same way about women selling their bodies for drugs. It's the same thing. And actually, selling one's body does make you a whore.

whore (hôr, hōr) Pronunciation Key
n.

1. A prostitute.
2. A person considered sexually promiscuous.
3. A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain.

intr.v. whored, whor·ing, whores

1. To associate or have sexual relations with prostitutes or a prostitute.
2. To accept payment in exchange for sexual relations.
3. To compromise one's principles for personal gain.


How would she not be a whore?
 
She should donate any excess to a home for wayward women.

Why should any rich person donate their excess to a home for wayward women?
 
I wonder just how many of you who have no problem with women selling their bodies for money feel the same way about women selling their bodies for drugs. It's the same thing.

Um...in order for that to be true there would have to be a valid comparison to drugs and money and there just isn't. She could use the money for her education. I'd say that would be better and far more productive than doing it for drugs.
 
I think its nasty to sell yourself for sex period. But hey, thats just me.

Sounds like to me your just jelous you couldn't get that much for your virginity, but that may just be me.

If I am wrong, I am sorry.

However, I have no problem with prostitution if done voluntary. I live in Nevada where there are a few bordellos that are operated. I even know one woman personally (I am a non customer if that is in question) who does it voluntarily because she makes money that she is putting away and investing and does it because she can make more than anywhere else for that short period of time.
 
I think its nasty to sell yourself for sex period. But hey, thats just me.
I wonder just how many of you who have no problem with women selling their bodies for money feel the same way about women selling their bodies for drugs. It's the same thing. And actually, selling one's body does make you a whore.

whore (hôr, hōr) Pronunciation Key
n.

1. A prostitute.
2. A person considered sexually promiscuous.
3. A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain.

intr.v. whored, whor·ing, whores

1. To associate or have sexual relations with prostitutes or a prostitute.
2. To accept payment in exchange for sexual relations.
3. To compromise one's principles for personal gain.


How would she not be a whore?

If someone wants to sell their body for drugs, that is their business. As long as they are not harming anyone else, I say go for it. We are conditioned in this society to believe that certain things are "bad" or "wrong" when in reality, they are not necessarily.

The girl in question is a "whore" by definition, but a whore is not really a bad thing. People give bad connotations to words to make themselves feel better about something they do not understand. It makes them feel like they have more control over a situation that they disapprove of. She is a "whore", and that is fine because it is her choosing.
 
Um...in order for that to be true there would have to be a valid comparison to drugs and money and there just isn't. She could use the money for her education. I'd say that would be better and far more productive than doing it for drugs.

My comparison was going based on the fact that you are okay with people "selling" their bodies for personal gain. Monetary gain was the only form mentioned. Hence me saying I wonder how many of you who are okay with her selling her body for money, would be okay with her selling her body for drugs. Besides, money could still be used to buy drugs. Why would it matter that they would drop the money part and exchange directly for drugs. Would you be okay with her selling her body for education directly? Or would that be demeaning and wrong?
 
Sounds like to me your just jelous you couldn't get that much for your virginity, but that may just be me.

If I am wrong, I am sorry.

However, I have no problem with prostitution if done voluntary. I live in Nevada where there are a few bordellos that are operated. I even know one woman personally (I am a non customer if that is in question) who does it voluntarily because she makes money that she is putting away and investing and does it because she can make more than anywhere else for that short period of time.

What part of my post gave you the impression I was jealous? If I were jealous, wouldn't I have tried to sell my virginity and failed? Hmm. I didn't know I suggested such a thing in my post. But that's okay if you feel that way. I lost my virginity in anot so great manner, but I don't dwell on it. I could care less if it's about virginity. I think it's nasty to sell your body. I am entitled to my opinion just as you are yours.
 
If someone wants to sell their body for drugs, that is their business. As long as they are not harming anyone else, I say go for it. We are conditioned in this society to believe that certain things are "bad" or "wrong" when in reality, they are not necessarily.

The girl in question is a "whore" by definition, but a whore is not really a bad thing. People give bad connotations to words to make themselves feel better about something they do not understand. It makes them feel like they have more control over a situation that they disapprove of. She is a "whore", and that is fine because it is her choosing.

I didn't realize I had suggested she was a terrible person. I just stated I think it's nasty. I can think it's nasty. It doesn't mean I am going to go all hell bent on a mission to stop her. I was merely stating that by definition she is a whore. I never said she should be killed or should catch an STD.
 
Last edited:
My comparison was going based on the fact that you are okay with people "selling" their bodies for personal gain. Monetary gain was the only form mentioned. Hence me saying I wonder how many of you who are okay with her selling her body for money, would be okay with her selling her body for drugs. Besides, money could still be used to buy drugs. Why would it matter that they would drop the money part and exchange directly for drugs. Would you be okay with her selling her body for education directly? Or would that be demeaning and wrong?

Personally I could care less if it's money or drugs. I thought you were trying to draw a comparison between the two. And I wouldn't say she's selling her body. She's selling her virginity. It's one night. The whole "selling your body" thing makes it sound much more extreme than it really is. It's just sex.
 
Personally I could care less if it's money or drugs. I thought you were trying to draw a comparison between the two. And I wouldn't say she's selling her body. She's selling her virginity. It's one night. The whole "selling your body" thing makes it sound much more extreme than it really is. It's just sex.

Sex can only be sex if bodies are involved.
 
Sex can only be sex if bodies are involved.

So what? I still wouldn't call it "selling her body". She's selling sex, not her body. I've found that people who use the phrase "selling her body" only do so because they believe sex to be this intensely precious and personal thing. If that were true for everyone then there would be no prostitutes, swingers, **** buddies, etc.
 
Personally I could care less if it's money or drugs. I thought you were trying to draw a comparison between the two. And I wouldn't say she's selling her body. She's selling her virginity. It's one night. The whole "selling your body" thing makes it sound much more extreme than it really is. It's just sex.

I wonder if these same people think you're "giving your body away for free" when you're just having sex and there's no money involved.
Does anyone really think of it in those terms?
When I have sex, I'm no more "giving my body away" than I'm taking somebody else's body away.
If something can't be given away, how can it be sold.
In fact, the original occupant of the body in question is still sovereign over the body, still the sole occupant, proprietor, and custodian of said body, monetary exchanges notwithstanding. There is no way to transfer ownership of one's body to someone else. You can't sell it, even if you wanted to. You can't even rent it out, because no matter what kind of sexual hijinx you get up to with another person, you- not they- are still the sole occupant of your body (and they're still the sole occupant of theirs).

One can't "sell one's body", unless one sells it to a medical school as a research cadaver... and then they can only collect it after one is already dead.

It's a dumb saying, "sell one's body".
it's alarmist, misleading, and false.
 
Here's a much less frightening and off-putting picture of her (although it does kind of look like she's cropped her head out and pasted it onto a different body, but I think this is actually a case of "too much self-tanner" plus the wrong shade of foundation makeup):


natalie.jpg

I think she is very pretty and do not understand all the cracks about her looks:(
 
Ummm this is called prostitution. e-prostitution. But prostitution all the same. Now let's see how many of the females in here supporting this are going to scream that I'm only saying that because I'm ugly and poor. ;)

I think what a lot of the people supporting this chick don't get is that REGARDLESS of whether it's her right or not. Solicitation and by extention prostitution are still illegal in the U.S. aren't they? This is a form of solicitation isn't it? **** if it's her right or not. It's illegal.

She could have the deal go down at the Bunny Ranch in Reno and it would be totally legal? :mrgreen:
 
I think homosexuality is wrong, yes. And its utterly dirty.

Would you lick a poo?

Dirty? I bet you would bang a woman via anal! :rofl

Maybe we should start a thread downstairs about this:mrgreen:
 
Whats wrong with sex? Its paying for it or receiving payments for it which is wrong.

Why does it bother you about the payment thing? I guess all things in life should be free? :2razz:
 
Tuck: Her Case

"Tuck: Her Case"

Hmmm,.. three million and doesn't want to keep her; what could that mean? :2razz:

Hell; if desperate, however not ugly, not unclean, sober, and nonviolent, wanna buy someones consenting daughter?
 
Back
Top Bottom