• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Student auctions off virginity for offers of more than £2.5 million

There are a few things that I don't think were mentioned here that I heard on another forum.One is, her sister worked at the Bunny Ranch for three weeks as a prostitute and paid for her schooling by that and here seems to be where this idea came from. Second, the act itself would probably happen at the Ranch and for this tryst she would presumably be employed there making this 100% legal. Guess is, the place gets a cut from the money. So no, what she's doing isn't illegal at all.

Yeah, i had read all that.
This info has been in previous articles.
 
Integrity? Judging another so very harshly does not reek of the least amount of integrity:confused:

Moral integrity for example.

I am a person who will beat myself up even for the smallest lie(which is usually accidental, if I ever lie) and regret it for days.
 
Him saying he would do that with another male makes it somehow worse?

I am not trying to attack you or anything but some of your posts seem sexist and this one smells of homophobia;)

I think homosexuality is wrong, yes. And its utterly dirty.

Would you lick a poo?
 
Wow.. Where is your fine morals and integrity in This post:rofl

Some of you are killing me here:lol::2razz::mrgreen:

Whats wrong with sex? Its paying for it or receiving payments for it which is wrong.
 
Here's a much less frightening and off-putting picture of her (although it does kind of look like she's cropped her head out and pasted it onto a different body, but I think this is actually a case of "too much self-tanner" plus the wrong shade of foundation makeup):


natalie.jpg

:rofl

your text is so true.. But still she looks like a whore who have been ****ed as many times as women twice her age. And she still have that transsexual look, just not as much in this picture.

Also, arm size compared to breast size is a bit offsetting.
 
I weep for the world when a women sells her virginity and people think it's a good thing.

I weep for the world all the time. This is just another example to fear the future of moral decay.
People, like morons they are cheer her on. :doh
 
:rofl

your text is so true.. But still she looks like a whore who have been ****ed as many times as women twice her age. And she still have that transsexual look, just not as much in this picture.

Also, arm size compared to breast size is a bit offsetting.

How does she look like a whore?
She looks like a very beautiful young lady and if she got 2.5 mil then good on her
 
She is a monster.

A monster? Overreact much? Just because it's something that you personally wouldn't do doesn't mean that you should pass judgment on others for doing so. I can think of far worse things in the world. :roll:
 
Really? The worst? I can top this.

I laugh at pictures of dead Palestinian children. Seriously. I'm not even saying it for shock value.



ROC, I am quite surprised at you. That is a very disgusting and disturbing thing to say. Children, innocent children, getting killed in the crossfire, and you laugh at that? I am guessing you do not have children or any sort of compassion in your soul to make a statement like that. I myself almost cry to think of those little bodies that have to endure the stupid behavior of the people who are supposed to be protecting them. I almost don't have the words to express my disgust at this kind of attitude. And the words I do have, are not fit for saying here.
 
Here's a much less frightening and off-putting picture of her (although it does kind of look like she's cropped her head out and pasted it onto a different body, but I think this is actually a case of "too much self-tanner" plus the wrong shade of foundation makeup):


natalie.jpg

her face doesn't mach her neck. wtf
 
Except at five feet tall and 100 pounds, I'm "ghastly thin".
What's "healthy"? 150? :roll:

Don't take this the wrong way, but that is like perfect for my preferences. Short and skinny is great.
 
ROC, I am quite surprised at you. That is a very disgusting and disturbing thing to say. Children, innocent children, getting killed in the crossfire, and you laugh at that? I am guessing you do not have children or any sort of compassion in your soul to make a statement like that. I myself almost cry to think of those little bodies that have to endure the stupid behavior of the people who are supposed to be protecting them. I almost don't have the words to express my disgust at this kind of attitude. And the words I do have, are not fit for saying here.

No I don't have kids and probably never will. I'm sorry that my lack of empathy for people I don't know on the other side of the planet bothers you, but the pictures are, to me, gruesomely funny.
 
her face doesn't mach her neck. wtf

Is her shoulder dislocated? Also look at the tiny breasts compared to the huge arms, and that begging look of a lying sob.
She does look a bit transsexual in the face still, but not as much as the other pic, do you not agree?
 
No I don't have kids and probably never will. I'm sorry that my lack of empathy for people I don't know on the other side of the planet bothers you, but the pictures are, to me, gruesomely funny.

Same for Israeli children.
 
Wouldn't you rather be "moral but poor and have integrity" than "rich and low on morals and integrity"?

My morals and integrity would recover, over time, from one wrongful act.

I may judge this young woman harshly for her plans, but even I understand that she will not be a whore forever.

---

I'm seeing hypocrisy, misogyny, an evil delight in using the basest insults against this woman...

It just so happens that the basest insults the English language holds are used to describe the behaviors that this women intends to engage in-- and they apply just as well, and even more derogatorily, to men who engage in the same behaviors.

A person who sells their sex is a whore.

But I will agree with you that the animosity directed against her in this thread is growing ridiculous. This is practically an Orwellian minute of hate.

---

Whatever, it's her right.

What right? I recognize no such right, and know of no official governing body that recognizes such a right. At best, the governments that tolerate this tolerate it only under strict regulation-- and reserve the prerogative to shut it down at any time.

I think the real issue is why would anyone want to pay this ugly, ugly woman for sex? Let alone THREE MILLION DOLLARS!?!? I seriously wouldn't have sex with this woman for free. She'd have to pay me if anything.

Don't be ridiculous. This is not an unattractive woman. She is merely doing an ugly, ugly thing.

---

I'm sorry, but how is it not right? According to whom? It's an agreement between two consenting adults.

It is not right because sex is an inherently personal act, and to commoditize, package, and market it otherwise is detrimental to all parties involved. It does not matter that they are "consenting adults"-- there are other parties involved, who are also damaged by the consequences of their actions.

---

It is a lot of resentment to hold for someone you do not know and who has no real impact on anyone else's life what-so-ever.

I do not resent her nearly as much as others in this thread. I resent what she is doing, and the attitude with which she is doing it. If anything, I resent the people defending her conduct more than I resent her-- though with the conduct of some of the people agreeing with me, I am forced to extend a grudging acknowledgment.

Do you feel you have a right to control people like her? If so, what gives you that right?

I feel I have the right to condemn behaviors that I find unacceptable, and to work together with those who agree with me to have those behaviors outlawed. I have that right because, like all people, I have opinions and the capacity to express and advocate them.

Why do you really feel so strongly about it? Why be so against people who are enjoying themselves with no harm to anyone else?

I resent the implication of this question. I have made abundantly clear why I object to this behavior and why I feel so strongly about that objection. And I reject your notion that the parties to this transaction are not causing harm; not only are they causing harm to themselves, but they are causing harm to their respective families and to society itself.

The fact that she is going into a field like marriage counseling, with infidelity being the #1 cause of divorce, suggests also that she will be doing far more harm in the future.

I think people like you are harboring bad emotions towards other people. maybe your heart was broken by a woman, so you hate all women. Maybe you do not get laid, so you hate all women. Etc, etc.

I think it's easier for people like you to make baseless speculations about someone else's motives than to examine the arguments they have plainly stated-- and to consider for a moment that your own hedonistic and hyper-individualized moral beliefs are deeply flawed.
 
I'm not terribly impressed by the morality of more than a few folks in this thread, frankly. I'm seeing hypocrisy, misogyny, an evil delight in using the basest insults against this woman... and wishing her ill. To me all of that is a reflection of lower morals than a woman who has wished no one ill, debased no one, and certainly hasn't set herself up as the harbinger of the morals of others.

I started off in this thread rather amused. At this point, I'm no longer amused. I'm actually feeling a bit of contempt... and it's not directed toward our auctioneering virgin.

What were you expecting? Seriously?
 
It is not right because sex is an inherently personal act, and to commoditize, package, and market it otherwise is detrimental to all parties involved. It does not matter that they are "consenting adults"-- there are other parties involved, who are also damaged by the consequences of their actions.

I don't think that's necessarily true. It's personal for some people. For others it isn't. How are other parties damaged?
 
I don't think that's necessarily true. It's personal for some people. For others it isn't. How are other parties damaged?

I'm guessing the other party would be her parents, friends, and maybe her boyfriend-- who is probably shocked and happy (because she is worth millions)
 
I'm guessing the other party would be her parents, friends, and maybe her boyfriend-- who is probably shocked and happy (because she is worth millions)

It's her choice, though. She's an adult. I've done lots of things my parents didn't agree with. However, they realized that I was an adult and that I had the right to make those choices for myself. Besides, now she's $2.5 million richer. She could probably buy and sell their asses! :lol:
 
I'm guessing the other party would be her parents, friends, and maybe her boyfriend-- who is probably shocked and happy (because she is worth millions)

Lol, can't say i'd blame them either. I'd be happy
 
Is her shoulder dislocated? Also look at the tiny breasts compared to the huge arms, and that begging look of a lying sob.
She does look a bit transsexual in the face still, but not as much as the other pic, do you not agree?

judging by the width of her arms I'd say she's probably overweight but sucking in her stomach. her makeup is entirely, entirely wrong for her and she needs to stop fake tanning; that is why her body and face don't match. they could never match under the circumstances. but aside from that she is not hideous and I don't think she looks mannish. she probably has some minor discoloration on her face which is why she uses full-coverage foundation. the texture of her skin doesn't seem all that bad to me so I don't think she's hiding monster acne or anything.
 
Back
Top Bottom