• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Student auctions off virginity for offers of more than £2.5 million

Like Dianna, I find the misogyny and hostility expressed here far more offensive than any factual discussion of sexual anatomy, male or female.
If you find such discussion inappropriate and/ or embarrassing, perhaps that lends a clue as to why you find this woman "one of the three worst people" of modern times, and wish she'd contract a disease.
Perhaps you are severely sexually repressed.

I've found with a lot of issues like this that a lot of men spew venom when they hear about a woman doing such a thing. I truly think it stems from bitterness and jealousy that they can't do so themselves. Some of the outrage being displayed here is way overboard.
 
Well, I don't buy it. It's one thing to say it. If it were a reality that would be an entirely different ballgame.

Seriously.. I have considered the reality through this post and the conclusion is that I would not have done it. My certainty on this only got stronger as the thread progressed.
 
Seriously.. I have considered the reality through this post and the conclusion is that I would not have done it. My certainty on this only got stronger as the thread progressed.

I still don't buy it. I've yet to meet one guy who isn't a sex crazed maniac. Once again, I think it's one thing to say it and it's a whole different ballgame if it were a reality. Most guys are desperate to lose their virginity as quickly as possible with mostly any willing participant. Hell, I would have sold my virginity for $5 if I actually could have gotten away with it.
 
I still don't buy it. I've yet to meet one guy who isn't a sex crazed maniac. Once again, I think it's one thing to say it and it's a whole different ballgame if it were a reality. Most guys are desperate to lose their virginity as quickly as possible with mostly any willing participant. Hell, I would have sold my virginity for $5 if I actually could have gotten away with it.

Dont get me wrong.. I am also a man("sex crazed maniac"), but I just wouldn't have done it.

Actually, I am talking about selling my body in general, at this day and age.. I was a very different man 10 years ago, back then I did a lot of stupid things, so I would probably have done it then. But if it was now, never. Not even sell sex for that price.
 
Last edited:
I still don't buy it. I've yet to meet one guy who isn't a sex crazed maniac. Once again, I think it's one thing to say it and it's a whole different ballgame if it were a reality. Most guys are desperate to lose their virginity as quickly as possible with mostly any willing participant. Hell, I would have sold my virginity for $5 if I actually could have gotten away with it.

I'm not even a guy, and I was pretty anxious to get rid of mine, too.
I wanted really badly to be grown up, and do everything that grownups did- you know, have sex, smoke cigarettes, have my own place, not go to school.

I mean, I realized grownups typically did more things than that, but one has to start somewhere.
 
Maximus Zeebra, I bet you could be a GQ Model? :roll: You are being very harsh on this womans looks and I bet you are not all that:lol::2razz:
 
Maximus Zeebra, I bet you could be a GQ Model? You are being very harsh on this womans looks and I bet you are not all that

I think I've seen some better pictures of her, at one time or another.
This picture is not too good, you've got to admit.
Her skin appears lumpy, her nose is crooked, and she's got some kind of weird circles under her eyes.
Not sexily dissipated, I've-been-burning-the-candle-at-both-ends circles, either.
It looks like she had some goggles on, and they left indentations in her skin.

But I do recall seeing some previous pictures of her at some point where she didn't look quite this bad.
 
Maximus Zeebra, I bet you could be a GQ Model? :roll: You are being very harsh on this womans looks and I bet you are not all that:lol::2razz:

GQ? I have no idea what that is.. As for myself I am not Brad Pitt, but I would never even consider for a second dating that woman.

She is certainly ugly in my eyes.
 
I wouldn't.. It would be hard to say not to such a large sum of money, but I still wouldn't, and I would feel good about not doing it.
If I did I could never forgive mysel, and my integrity would lay in shatters, something far worse than not taking some money.

Integrity? Judging another so very harshly does not reek of the least amount of integrity:confused:
 
Even to a man? Geez..

Wouldn't you rather be "moral but poor and have integrity" than "rich and low on morals and integrity"?

Imagine how LOW you would feel for doing that.

Him saying he would do that with another male makes it somehow worse?

I am not trying to attack you or anything but some of your posts seem sexist and this one smells of homophobia;)
 
This is just untrue. The best women are the ones who know really well how to screw a man ;)

Also there is a different between a(worn out, like you imply) women who has had LOTS of sex and one who knows what she is doing.

Wow.. Where is your fine morals and integrity in This post:rofl

Some of you are killing me here:lol::2razz::mrgreen:
 
How about "conducive to honorable and healthy relationships"? Or "not detrimental to her dignity or the dignity of her family"?

Or, the good, old-fashioned "not being a whore."



Obviously, she doesn't define it the same way, because her own words show a perverse pride in aspiring to become a whore.

And my definition of "right" may not be more objective than hers... but I'll stand by it nonetheless. What she is doing is sick and wrong, the pride she is taking in it is sick and wrong, and a society which celebrates-- or even tolerates-- this behavior is sick and wrong. The fact that she is doing this with the plan of becoming a therapist, of making a living by trying to help other people form healthy relationships with others, horrifies me.

In this one area, at least, I can be grateful that the laws in the majority of this country do support me.

That is a lot of subjective defining. It is a lot of resentment to hold for someone you do not know and who has no real impact on anyone else's life what-so-ever.

Do you feel you have a right to control people like her? If so, what gives you that right? Why do you really feel so strongly about it? Why be so against people who are enjoying themselves with no harm to anyone else?

I think people like you are harboring bad emotions towards other people. maybe your heart was broken by a woman, so you hate all women. Maybe you do not get laid, so you hate all women. Etc, etc.

I think people let their resentments get in other people's way to much. If no one else is being harmed, let people do their own thing.

Why should your ill-will stop anyone else from being happy?
 
She's selling her body for money. She's a slut, a shameless slut. Period.

Is that necessarily a bad thing? Is it bad for her because it is for you? Should she have to stop because your definition of "slut" is a bad thing? Why are you so against people having their own fun?
 
Here's a much less frightening and off-putting picture of her (although it does kind of look like she's cropped her head out and pasted it onto a different body, but I think this is actually a case of "too much self-tanner" plus the wrong shade of foundation makeup):


natalie.jpg
 
Last edited:
she's perfectly decent looking, I don't know what you're talking about. you know it's because of people like you that we ladies have to be tall, thin and blonde all the time.

Not true.

Short, healthy-thin, and brunette works just fine.
 
Not true.

Short, healthy-thin, and brunette works just fine.

Except at five feet tall and 100 pounds, I'm "ghastly thin".
What's "healthy"? 150? :roll:
 
Except at five feet tall and 100 pounds, I'm "ghastly thin".
What's "healthy"? 150? :roll:

You could stand to put on a few more pounds so your ribs arent showing.

P.S. attention whore :lol:
 
Oh and for the original posting...

Yeah, I would've sold my virginity for a pack of cigarettes. Guess my standards are low :2razz:
 
Is that necessarily a bad thing? Is it bad for her because it is for you? Should she have to stop because your definition of "slut" is a bad thing? Why are you so against people having their own fun?

I weep for the world when a women sells her virginity and people think it's a good thing.
 
Good for her, enjoy the money too lol
 
Ummm this is called prostitution. e-prostitution. But prostitution all the same. Now let's see how many of the females in here supporting this are going to scream that I'm only saying that because I'm ugly and poor. ;)

I think what a lot of the people supporting this chick don't get is that REGARDLESS of whether it's her right or not. Solicitation and by extention prostitution are still illegal in the U.S. aren't they? This is a form of solicitation isn't it? **** if it's her right or not. It's illegal.
 
Last edited:
Personally I don't think she looks all that bad. She's no Pamela Anderson granted. But she's definately no Rosie O'Donnell either. ;) In other words I've seen better, and I've seen worse.

As for her selling off her viginity? Hey it's her body, she can do what she wants with it as far as I care. I wouldn't spend no 3 million for it but I certainly wouldn't mind tapping that either. If I wasn't married that is.

As for it being prostitution, yeah technically it is. But I wouldn't charge her. But then I wouldn't charge any prostitute. Like I said, it's their body, we have no right to determine what they should/shouldn't do with it. So long as it doesn't harm anyone anyways. And being a virgin I highly doubt that it would harm anyone. It's also quite possible that she won't be charged with it since the cops have no idea when or where such a thing will happen. For all they know it could happen in a different country.
 
Personally I don't think she looks all that bad. She's no Pamela Anderson granted. But she's definately no Rosie O'Donnell either. ;) In other words I've seen better, and I've seen worse.

As for her selling off her viginity? Hey it's her body, she can do what she wants with it as far as I care. I wouldn't spend no 3 million for it but I certainly wouldn't mind tapping that either. If I wasn't married that is.

As for it being prostitution, yeah technically it is. But I wouldn't charge her. But then I wouldn't charge any prostitute. Like I said, it's their body, we have no right to determine what they should/shouldn't do with it. So long as it doesn't harm anyone anyways. And being a virgin I highly doubt that it would harm anyone. It's also quite possible that she won't be charged with it since the cops have no idea when or where such a thing will happen. For all they know it could happen in a different country.

I'm assuming a short time before she has to explain to the IRS why her revenue for that particular year was in excess of $3,000,000USD.
 
Jeesh. I wonder how her parents cope with this.
 
Ummm this is called prostitution. e-prostitution. But prostitution all the same. Now let's see how many of the females in here supporting this are going to scream that I'm only saying that because I'm ugly and poor. ;)

I think what a lot of the people supporting this chick don't get is that REGARDLESS of whether it's her right or not. Solicitation and by extention prostitution are still illegal in the U.S. aren't they? This is a form of solicitation isn't it? **** if it's her right or not. It's illegal.

There are a few things that I don't think were mentioned here that I heard on another forum.One is, her sister worked at the Bunny Ranch for three weeks as a prostitute and paid for her schooling by that and here seems to be where this idea came from. Second, the act itself would probably happen at the Ranch and for this tryst she would presumably be employed there making this 100% legal. Guess is, the place gets a cut from the money. So no, what she's doing isn't illegal at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom