• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama camp 'prepared to talk to Hamas'

I find it equally pathetic you cannot condemn the deaths of civilians yet expect us to bequeath that to Israelis. Yeah right.

They are very welcome :roll:

Israel does not warrant the condemnation. Hamas does deserve condemnation for deliberately putting civilians at risk.

At worst, Israel should be expected to announce its regret. That's it.

Why don't you people condemn Hamas for deliberately putting civilians at risk?
 
Your ignorance has no bounds.

Israel is using smart weapons. Israel is warning residents to evacuate neighborhoods before they attack.

What the hell would satisfy you?

Not blowing up a school and using a ground attack on the cowards shooting mortars from the school, for example. Risk the lives of their soldiers instead of callously disgarding the lives of civilians when you KNOW your enemy is using innocents as human shields.

Smart Bombs are not smart enough to tell the difference between a civilian and a militant. A person is.



You think so? :roll:

I mean, isn't this already self-evident?

So it isn't enough to denounce the people doing so, I must absolve Israel of all wrongdoing at the same time? :roll:
 
Does no one get that storing/using weapons in a place like a school is a war crime?

Or do "war crimes" only matter when they can be used as a bludgeon against Americans and their allies?
 
Does no one get that storing/using weapons in a place like a school is a war crime?

Or do "war crimes" only matter when they can be used as a bludgeon against Americans and their allies?

I think it is definitely a war crime. I don't think it justifies blowing up the school and exacerbating the war crime by commiting one of your own.

But I do, in fact, hold Israel to a higher standard precicely because they are our ally.
 
Not blowing up a school and using a ground attack on the cowards shooting mortars from the school, for example.

So stop defending themselves.


Risk the lives of their soldiers instead of callously disgarding the lives of civilians when you KNOW your enemy is using innocents as human shields.

Right, so stop defending themselves.

Smart Bombs are not smart enough to tell the difference between a civilian and a militant. A person is.

So ignore the efforts of Israel in attempting to mitigate civilian casualties.

So it isn't enough to denounce the people doing so, I must absolve Israel of all wrongdoing at the same time? :roll:

Hardly. I was simply noting that what you're stating should have been self-evident. That you felt compelled to declare as much suggests that their use of human shields was unknown to you before today. otherwise, there'd be no need to say it all.
 
Yeah, easy for some arrogant liberal to declare when you have nothing at stake.

You're just laying insult because my opinion is different and in this instance you're controlled by emotion. What I said is the rational solution to never ending war. These people have been fighting for decades, it's not like this just broke out the other day. Your arguments would have more weight if it had. But this is a cycle now, it doesn't matter who started it initially; what matters is breaking the cycle. With such entrenched fear and hate the only thing which could bring about this change is for both sides to acknowledge their wrong doings and for both sides to commit to leaving those wrong doings in the past. You merely want to call this "arrogance" because you emotion is blinding you, your blind faith to Israel is blinding you.

The Arabs and Muslims believe they are winning as Israel continues conceding land that immediately becomes new launching points for terror attacks. They believe that they are winning because western civilization condemns Israel for defending herself.

Israel itself can no longer be given a free ticket. Both sides must be held accountable for their actions. Is this liberal arrogance? Holding people accountable? Maybe now it is.

Again, stinking rotten liberal arrogance.

Insult and emotionalized rhetoric won't prove your point.

The Muslims don't believe that they are doing wrong. Remember, it's us that consider them as resistance fighters and militants and thereby legitimze their actions.

Israel feels that it's ok to take out 100's of Palestinians per Israeli. What's the point? Both are committing bad acts against each other and both think they're in the right for doing so.

Your liberal arrogance blinds you to the fact that this is a never-ending war because one side doesn't want the other exist and they're not just fighting over lines in the sand.

In the end, it's always about property, money, or power. Your emotions prevent you from rationally analyzing this.

Why what? We're not defining it. Israel is a democracy no matter how much you hate them.

I don't hate Israel, I just think that their problems are their problems and they should solve them themselves.

And, no, it's not our job to defend everyone. No one is arguing that we should be.

People are arguing that we must protect Israel because it's a democracy. We're not here to spread democracy or protect all democracy. People need to fight for their own government and their own freedom. It's not our job to do it for them.

So we should let this democracy be wiped out, eh?

You saying Israel can't win? Again, our govenrment is not empowered to spread democracy, it's not empowered to fight other people's battles.

Oh, so a democracy is onyl worth defending it that democracy can satisfy some set of conditions which are hardly identifiable or important.

Fail!

No, as I said, I'd still argue that it's their business to defend themselves and they should be left to it. Try reading.
 
I think it is definitely a war crime. I don't think it justifies blowing up the school and exacerbating the war crime by commiting one of your own.

It isn't a war crime to take out a military target. It's a war crime make a school INTO a military target.
 
I think it is definitely a war crime. I don't think it justifies blowing up the school and exacerbating the war crime by commiting one of your own.

But I do, in fact, hold Israel to a higher standard precicely because they are our ally.

Why do you insist in arguing, explicitly or implicitly, that the Israeli's intentionally blow up schools?

A higher standard?

Your higher standard would leave Israel defenseless and totally unwilling to defend herself.

Pathetic.
 
It isn't a war crime to take out a military target. It's a war crime make a school INTO a military target.

Do you really thnk that posters like Laila and Tucker will ever accept this type of reasoning?
 
I think it is definitely a war crime. I don't think it justifies blowing up the school and exacerbating the war crime by commiting one of your own.
The weapons/combatants in the school turn the school into a legitimate target.
 
I think it is definitely a war crime. I don't think it justifies blowing up the school and exacerbating the war crime by commiting one of your own.

If you are referring to the UNRW school that was bombed, it has already been shown that it was a lie which Israel has already retracted.

Link
 
So stop defending themselves.

A ground attack is not defending one's self? How so?




Right, so stop defending themselves.

refer to previous statement


So ignore the efforts of Israel in attempting to mitigate civilian casualties.

What am I ignoring? Is a smart bomb on a shool preventing civilian casualties?


Hardly. I was simply noting that what you're stating should have been self-evident. That you felt compelled to declare as much suggests that their use of human shields was unknown to you before today. otherwise, there'd be no need to say it all.

That's logic. Accuse someone of being a terrorist apologist and then if they actually have the GALL to denounce actions of the terrorists, attack them for doing that.

What would satisfy you?

Shall I purchase a Yamulke?

Blow a rabbi?

Maybe kill a terrorist with a rubber band and a string of twine?

Take a **** the Quran and set fire to a puppy?

What?
 
But I do, in fact, hold Israel to a higher standard precicely because they are our ally.

There's a human standard, or there isn't.

The idea that some people are "allowed" to act in barbaric ways that "we" aren't is stupid and suicidal, not to mention laced with bigotry to boot.
 
If you are referring to the UNRW school that was bombed, it has already been shown that it was a lie which Israel has already retracted
A bald-faced lie.
The mortars were outside, not inside the school.
 
:roll:
The mortar fire came from outside the school rather than inside.

Either way, the TARGET if the Israeli fire was the Hamas mortars.

Hamas put the mortars outside the school so that people like you would have yet another thin excuse to equivocate Israeli actions with those of Hamas.

If the mortars were not in the school, how was shooting at the school targeting the mortars?

The UN said last night that the Israeli military had privately admitted that the shelling of a UN school in Jabaliya which killed more than 40 Palestinians on Tuesday was in response to militant fire from outside, not inside, the UN compound.

After the attack, the Israeli military said an initial inquiry had shown that several mortar shells had been fired at Israeli forces "from within the Jabaliya school" and that Israeli forces had returned fire.

However, a UN spokesman yesterday said the military had admitted that this account was no longer accurate. "In private briefings with diplomats the Israeli army has admitted that the militant fire from Jabaliya did not come from within a UN compound but outside and therefore allegations that this fire came from inside our compound are completely baseless," said Chris Gunness, spokesman for UNWRA.

Last night, the Israel Defence Force, stood by its initial account."The source of the fire was from within the school compound and that we returned fire and we have intelligence information that we hit the actual mortar firing squad that was firing at us," said Captain Benjamin Rutland, an Israeli military spokesman.

Earlier yesterday, John Ging, director of operations in Gaza for UNRWA, visited the school himself."I am very confident now that there was no militant activity inside the school nor militants in the school. If anybody has evidence to the contrary, then let's bring it forward."
 
You're just laying insult because my opinion is different and in this instance you're controlled by emotion.

Yeah, I am quite frustrated by your absurd comments.

What I said is the rational solution to never ending war.

Huh? Arguing that each side should just stop is rational only to some arrogant boob who thinks that national interest or religious interest are just outdated and unimportant.

These people have been fighting for decades, it's not like this just broke out the other day. Your arguments would have more weight if it had.

Oh, nonsense.

My comments are directed at your argument.

But this is a cycle now, it doesn't matter who started it initially; what matters is breaking the cycle.

And only an arrogant liberal fool would argue that all is needed is for us to talk to the terrorists so they don't feel ignored and to encourage both sides to just drop their grievances or their national interest in self-preservation.

With such entrenched fear and hate the only thing which could bring about this change is for both sides to acknowledge their wrong doings and for both sides to commit to leaving those wrong doings in the past.

Are you serious?

This totaly disregards the FACT that the Arabs and Muslims don't want to co-exist.

What do you not get about this?

You merely want to call this "arrogance" because you emotion is blinding you, your blind faith to Israel is blinding you.

No, it's arrogant to think that this war is simply being fought over outdated or irrelevant interests.

Israel itself can no longer be given a free ticket.

Who the hell is giving them a free ticket? Israel is universally condemned in this war while Hamas is permitted to freely attack without condemnation from the EU, UN, the western intelligentsia, the western media, etc.

Both sides must be held accountable for their actions. Is this liberal arrogance? Holding people accountable? Maybe now it is.

No, that comment does not reflect liberal arrogance. I clearly told you what I thought was representaitve of liberal arrogance.

Insult and emotionalized rhetoric won't prove your point.

My point is proved otherwise.

Israel feels that it's ok to take out 100's of Palestinians per Israeli. What's the point? Both are committing bad acts against each other and both think they're in the right for doing so.

Bad acts? Can you be any more childish?

Israel feels it's her sovereign right to defend herself. That she is more successful at defending herself shouldn't be a point of discussion or condemnation.

In the end, it's always about property, money, or power. Your emotions prevent you from rationally analyzing this.

Oh my goodness. So this war has nothing to do with the Arab and Muslim anti-semitism and a nation defending herself from such?

It's just about ~insert someone~ pursuit of money, property, or power?

:roll:

I don't hate Israel, I just think that their problems are their problems and they should solve them themselves.

Yeah, their problem is that Arabs and Muslims want to annihilate her. And Israel is attempting to solve that problem...no thanks to people like you that condemn her for defending herself.

People are arguing that we must protect Israel because it's a democracy. We're not here to spread democracy or protect all democracy. People need to fight for their own government and their own freedom. It's not our job to do it for them.

What you think we are here for and what our elected leaders think we are here for are certainly two different things. I happen to believe in American exceptionalism while people like you simply prefer to believe that the US is just a greedy imperialistic and paternalistic autocracy.

You saying Israel can't win? Again, our govenrment is not empowered to spread democracy, it's not empowered to fight other people's battles.

Defending Israel ain't neither one.

No, as I said, I'd still argue that it's their business to defend themselves and they should be left to it. Try reading.

They are defending themselves even as you constantly criticize and condemn them for doing so.

Your arguments would have israel not defend themselves because nothing they can do will satisfy your standards.
 
Your ignorance has no bounds.

Israel is using smart weapons. Israel is warning residents to evacuate neighborhoods before they attack.

So Israel used smart bombs to attack a school when mortar fire came from outside the school.

That makes it sound like it was no accident to deliberately target a school.

Cite that Israel warned the school to evacuate before shooting at it with smart bombs?
 
Are you ever going to admit (even just to yourself) that the Israelis were firing at the mortars, not the school?

Why were they targeting the school with smart bombs if the mortar fire was from outside the school compound?
 
There's a human standard, or there isn't.

The idea that some people are "allowed" to act in barbaric ways that "we" aren't is stupid and suicidal, not to mention laced with bigotry to boot.

Who is saying "allowed"? Where did I say that?

I'm saying I hold my friends to a higher standard than I do my enemies. I EXPECT those I consider enemies to do attrocious things, hence they are the ENEMY. I in turn expect my FRIENDS to not sink to the level of the ENEMY.

What is difficult to understand about this?

I'm not saying Israel has no right to defend itself, I'm saying that we should hold them to a higher standard than that which we condemn our enemies for.
 
A ground attack is not defending one's self? How so?

Oh? So you're a-okay with a ground invasion? Color me overwhelmed with surprise. :roll:

What am I ignoring? Is a smart bomb on a shool preventing civilian casualties?

Yeah, It could be a dummy rocket that the Arabs and Muslims fire into israel. It could be untargetted artillery fire. It could be dummy bombs just pickeled off aircraft with no concern for their targets.

That's logic. Accuse someone of being a terrorist apologist and then if they actually have the GALL to denounce actions of the terrorists, attack them for doing that.

Because nothing you had stated previously suggested that you believed Hamas was guilty of anything.

What would satisfy you?

Measured judgment on your part.
 
Why do you insist in arguing, explicitly or implicitly, that the Israeli's intentionally blow up schools?

A higher standard?

Your higher standard would leave Israel defenseless and totally unwilling to defend herself.

Pathetic.

Aren't smart bombs pretty accurate?

Where is the report from the IDF asserting that the school was hit be mistake.

There initial claim, not admitted to be a false according to the UN report, was that they targeted the school because morter fire was coming from the school. And, according to you, using smart bombs.

Doesn't sound like an accident to me.
 
If the mortars were not in the school, how was shooting at the school targeting the mortars?

Israel was not shooting at the school.

You are aware that some nations can triangulate mortar, artillery, and rocket fire and determine the firing location, right?

Why do you insist that they were shooting at the school rather than the location on or next to the school grounds where Israel had detected mortar fire coming from?
 
A bald-faced lie.
The mortars were outside, not inside the school.

After the attack, the Israeli military said an initial inquiry had shown that several mortar shells had been fired at Israeli forces "from within the Jabaliya school" and that Israeli forces had returned fire.

I agree that sounds like a bald faced lie.
 
Who is saying "allowed"? Where did I say that?

I'm saying I hold my friends to a higher standard than I do my enemies. I EXPECT those I consider enemies to do attrocious things, hence they are the ENEMY. I in turn expect my FRIENDS to not sink to the level of the ENEMY.

What is difficult to understand about this?
So...
If the US army comes up against an enemy that does nothing but puts troops, weapons, ammunition, supplies and ordnance in schools, churches and hospitals, the US army can never engage those troops?

:shock:

The relevant standard here is that doing any of those removes the 'restrictions' on deliberately putting fire down on thoise structures.
 
So Israel used smart bombs to attack a school when mortar fire came from outside the school.

Did they?

That makes it sound like it was no accident to deliberately target a school.

I'd agree if that were the case. It wasn't.

Cite that Israel warned the school to evacuate before shooting at it with smart bombs?

Who argued they had?

Care to actually address points I made?
 
Back
Top Bottom