• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Israeli air strikes target Gaza

The start of the conflict goes back to the foundation of Israel, not the formation of Hamas...



Because if you do then you're a jew hating nazi, or something.

"BLASPHEMER it is only you dirty Joos that do wrong in the ME"

Stay on topic or leave.

Thanks
 
Stay on topic or leave.

How about you just leave, because you're the one that brought it up in the first place and have offered nothing to this discussion besides "Killing civilians is just swell in my book!"
 
I said Israel is killing civilians... and they are. Please take time to read the post before getting emotional and responding hastily.

What you said is IRRELEVANT because Israel is NOT attacking civilians. That is bull**** rhetoric.

Isreal is attacking terrorists who are at this very moment ... LAUNCHING ROCKETS INTO ISRAEL.

You are wrong on this issue and you need to accept this fact and move on.
 
What you said is IRRELEVANT because Israel is NOT attacking civilians. That is bull**** rhetoric.

Either Israel is attacking civilians when they bomb them or bombing something isn't attacking it. I could see you try to defend the latter, but I don't think you will in this instance.

You are wrong on this issue and you need to accept this fact and move on.

And you are a hypocrite and you need to accept this fact and move on.
 
How about you just leave, because you're the one that brought it up in the first place and have offered nothing to this discussion besides "Killing civilians is just swell in my book!"

I didn't bring it up... you did.

I stated that Hamas started the conflict and you retorted with it.

You are wrong now and you were wrong then.

Isreal isn't deliberately killing civilians like you're propagandising. You are slandering Israel.

Israel is killing the terrorists who are responsible for launching rockets into Israel.
 
Isreal isn't deliberately killing civilians like you're propagandising. You are slandering Israel.

Knowing that someone that is innocent is where you are bombing and still bombing it is deliberately bombing those innocents.
 
Either Israel is attacking civilians when they bomb them or bombing something isn't attacking it. I could see you try to defend the latter, but I don't think you will in this instance.

Now you're just making excuses.


And you are a hypocrite and you need to accept this fact and move on.

More adhom attacks. Great. It just proves your points have been defeated and that you're lashing out.
 
Knowing that someone that is innocent is where you are bombing and still bombing it is deliberately bombing those innocents.

Wrong.

There are terrorist there. The civilians were warned IN ADVANCE to get out of there.

The choice to stay was their own.

The had the chance to leave... they chose to stay behind.

Your point is defeated. Move on.
 
How are either of those posts Ad Hominem?

You just got proven wrong:

Ad hominems are when you don't address someone's argument and instead you attack the person. What I did was address your argument and conclude from your argument that your position is hypocritical. I then went on, after addressing your argument, to calling you a hypocrite.


You lose.

I was specifically referring to the two posts you quoted as being ad hominem. They were not. Why are you having such a hard time with this?
 
Either Israel is attacking civilians when they bomb them or bombing something isn't attacking it. I could see you try to defend the latter, but I don't think you will in this instance.



And you are a hypocrite and you need to accept this fact and move on.

Do you know for a fact the Mosque wasn't being used to stage,plan or stock weapons? Yes? or No?
 
Now you're just making excuses.

More adhom attacks. Great. It just proves your points have been defeated and that you're lashing out.

You have been throwing an emotional tantrum for last 5 pages of this thread. The vast majority of your posts are opinion stated as fact. What does that say about your argument?
 
I was specifically referring to the two posts you quoted as being ad hominem. They were not. Why are you having such a hard time with this?

Whatever.

You got proven wrong. You're not getting of it now.

You were wrong.

Have the courage to admit it.
 
Do you know for a fact the Mosque wasn't being used to stage,plan or stock weapons? Yes? or No?

We do not know. So, as I said before, you have to take the Israelis word for it. Blind faith.
 
You have been throwing an emotional tantrum for last 5 pages of this thread. The vast majority of your posts are opinion stated as fact. What does that say about your argument?

Says you.

My posts are more factual than yours.

I can tell the difference between attacks on civillians and attacks on terrorists and the places they use to store weapons and plan attacks.

Clearly you cannot.

I am sorry for you.
 
Whatever.

You got proven wrong. You're not getting of it now.

You were wrong.

Have the courage to admit it.

Haha! You are quite an amusing individual. I referred to 2 posts specifically. I said that they did not contain ad hominem. You then brought in a 3rd post, which I did not even refer to originally, and claimed to have proven me wrong.

Your posts in this thread will supply me with laughs for a week. :lol: :2rofll:
 
We do not know. So, as I said before, you have to take the Israelis word for it. Blind faith.

If it was hit, Israel had a reason for doing so.

You cannot say that it wasn't being used for such purposes. Israel has intelligence that indicates it is being used by Hamas or it wouldn't have been hit.

Furthermore, you cannot prove that it wasn't being used by Hamas. As such, your argument is defeated.
 
We do not know. So, as I said before, you have to take the Israelis word for it. Blind faith.

I would take their word over the Hamas who just like the hezbollah have been know to blow things out of proportion or just make chit up to feed the anti Jewish fire in the Arab press.
 
Haha! You are quite an amusing individual. I referred to 2 posts specifically. I said that they did not contain ad hominem. You then brought in a 3rd post, which I did not even refer to originally, and claimed to have proven me wrong.

Your posts in this thread will supply me with laughs for a week. :lol: :2rofll:

You got proven wrong and now you're lying to cover up this fact.

You're a funny guy.

:rofl
 
I would take their word over the Hamas who just like the hezbollah have been know to blow things out of proportion or just make chit up to feed the anti Jewish fire in the Arab press.

I would not trust either of them. They are both headstrong and ruthless with agendas that involve supreme control of the region.
 
I would not trust either of them. They are both headstrong and ruthless with agendas that involve supreme control of the region.

Says you.

Israel wants to live in peace.

It is Hamas that is constatnly preventing that.
 
Last edited:
I would not trust either of them. They are both headstrong and ruthless with agendas that involve supreme control of the region.

Is that so? Who of the two teach their kids to worship suicide bombers in Elementary school?

The fact is if left ALONE Abbas could reach a peace deal with Israel bringing peace between the two and a new country called Palestine.
 
Back
Top Bottom