• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Prophet': Obama won't make it to the White House

danarhea

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,256
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Leland Freeborn, a self proclaimed prophet, is predicting that God is so angry about Obama being elected that he is going to cause riots which will keep Obama from taking office, and an eventual nuclear apocalypse.

Really??? I thought God was angry about wars, kids going hungry, and racist whack jobs who proclaim that they speak in his name - You know, that sort of thing.

Article is here.
 
Last edited:
This so called prophet is proof that there are whackos even on the Christian side.
 
great, another former mormon gone off the deep end...
it is only a matter of time til some idiot associates this with the entire LDS church..:roll:
 
A load of religious bull**** that again, contradicts the entire thing it stems from: world peace and faith in God.
 
I love how many people claim to speak for God and know what he's going to do as if they have the inside scoop or some kind of special golden telephone that he talks only to them on. The sad thing is that a lot of these religious idiots seem to have golden telephones that reach God and if all of them are right then God is one crazy and unpredictable mofo.
 
Always consider four possibilities when someone claims to speak for God:
  1. They are sincere, but deluded or insane.
  2. They are insincere and hucksters.
  3. They are insincere and attempting to discredit God.
  4. They are correct.

The first three are by far the most likely. The fourth however has occasionally been problematic. Not in this case I think.

As a side note, I don't get the impression the God is angry about wars and hungry children per se. I have the distinct feeling the God is angry about the things inside people that make war possible, and allow children to go hungry.

God is highly concerned with root causes. (Am I speaking for God?)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom