• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:237]Miami police launch investigation after video shows officer striking Black woman

No, I would do the sensible thing and back off until she calmed down. If a cop can't manage to do something so fundamentally simple I suggest re-training. Don't your cops get training in de-escalation?

He did de-escalate the situation.
 
He did de-escalate the situation.

This says a lot about right wing thinking. They think the government should "de-escalate" by committing violence until you submit. (and they think they are the "small government" types :lamo )
 
No, you are the one who is exposing yourself with things that are factually untrue and not even responding to the actual content of my posts. I was not talking about this lady but about something else you nonsensically claimed.

So again, you were attempting to go off subject. Gotcha.
 
No man who can't restrain himself from physically assaulting a woman has the right to call himself a 'man'.

Again, she's lucky that's all he did. Maybe next time she'll catch her flight on time and not threaten other staff for her tardiness.
 
And maybe the cop should learn what 'backing off' and allowing a situation to calm down, means. Is being an idiot a prerequisite for a cop's job in America?

He was called to the scene, he's legally obligated to respond. And your female thug was out of control and had to be arrested. Next time tell her to get on her return flight to Chiraq, on time.
 
He was called to the scene, he's legally obligated to respond. And your female thug was out of control and had to be arrested. Next time tell her to get on her return flight to Chiraq, on time.

Was he legally obligated to assault her?
 
MDP doesn't want thousands of rioting blacks and their lib Antifa handlers destroying an entire airport.

How come people like you are absolutely livid about someone defacing a statue of a confederate general but don't give a **** about a police officer assaulting a woman under cover of authority and then falsely accusing her of the felony of assaulting an officer?
 
How come people like you are absolutely livid about someone defacing a statue of a confederate general but don't give a **** about a police officer assaulting a woman under cover of authority and then falsely accusing her of the felony of assaulting an officer?

I never said anything about a statue.

She got arrested. She deserves to be in prison.
 
Was she legally justified in assaulting him? Spreading her droplets to him?

Don't ****ing pretend you think it's a problem to breathe around other people, antimasker.
 
I never said anything about a statue.

She got arrested. She deserves to be in prison.

Thank you for proving me correct. Her alleged crime is irrelevant. The officer assaulted her, but you think it's ok because she's black.
 
Don't ****ing pretend you think it's a problem to breathe around other people, antimasker.

I'm not pretending, I'm actually serious. The real hypocrites are your rioters who wish to congregate and infect each other and anyone surrounding them.
 
Thank you for proving me correct. Her alleged crime is irrelevant. The officer assaulted her, but you think it's ok because she's black.

You were proven wrong, yet again. Her actual crime is relevant and she assaulted the officer. I never said it was because she's black.
 
You were proven wrong, yet again. Her actual crime is relevant and she assaulted the officer. I never said it was because she's black.

She didn't assault the officer.
 
So again, you were attempting to go off subject. Gotcha.

More untruths I see, I responded to your post, used the subject and content you posted. So if you think I went off topic, then again you are not accurate/posting nonsense.
 
More untruths I see, I responded to your post, used the subject and content you posted. So if you think I went off topic, then again you are not accurate/posting nonsense.

You went off topic. Even another poster called you out on this. The point of the matter is she deserved to be arrested. Now she will have a hard time finding a good job with a criminal record. Consequences of stupidity.
 
You went off topic. Even another poster called you out on this. The point of the matter is she deserved to be arrested. Now she will have a hard time finding a good job with a criminal record. Consequences of stupidity.

Why do you keep telling stupid untruths? I responded to your comment, you wrote:

Quote Originally Posted by Michael Johnson
Yes.

I've told this to my female listeners on my show multiple times that they cannot get in a man's face, verbally castrating him and expecting him to 100% use discernment, every single occasion.


A man is very slow to anger (this officer probably had a bad day or personal issues and this idiot was the cherry on top) but testing the limits is unwise.

My responses were mostly in connection with the comment in red, you know, the utter nonsense you claimed.

So stop telling porkies because I responded to what you wrote or in response to others. If you take it off course by whining about verbally assertive women and the pathetic men who feel castrated by "words" well, that is your problem. Not mine.
 
Back
Top Bottom