:laughat: Once again you cowardly bypass the notification function by omitting the open bracket before the quote
The pathetic and desperate argument you've put forth has been easily refuted... you simply refuse to acknowledge your error out of pettiness.
Executive orders don't prove anything. Where is the Trump bump?
Again, comparing nominal data is a statistically invalid method when doing so on a historical basis. It's been explained to you dozens of times... and still you refuse to admit to your errors in reasoning.
Slow learner learns slow.
I didn't ignore anything. Deficits are stimulative, as they necessarily draw from a stock of funds and inject that into the real economy. Without deficits, tax cuts would be sterilized.
I've remained consistant throughout the Trump Presidency... it's you that has changed direction. When Trump didn't deliver on what he (and you!) promised, a bullseye was drawn around the data and you underwhelmingly proclaimed victory. It won't work because, as has been stated a plethora of times, it's statistically invalid.
It has nothing to do with me, and no amount of detraction from the topic negates this fact. The economy didn't grow the way you and Trump envisioned and now you're taking it out on everyone else with these mindless copypasta rants.
