- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Again, context has no place in that liberal mind of yours, context that the U-3 is a better index than the U-6, that the bottom line in employment which included record numbers of under employed indicates a successful Obama economic policy. The electorate got it but the left still continues to post out of context data.
Here remains reality
U-6 in January 2017 9.3% vs 6.9% February 2020? Wow!! 2.4% better U-6 obviously meaningless to you. U-6 indicates economic activity and includes all the under employed
Top Picks (Most Requested Statistics) : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Part time for economic reasons, 5.7 million January 2017 vs. 4.2 million February 2020? Looks to me that incredible job growth you claim was boosted by part time jobs. Part time for economic reason jobs when the recession started 4.8 million, 5.7 million when Obama left office
Top Picks (Most Requested Statistics) : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Last edited: