• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Police for me, not for thee

Some of them did but I don't think they have had a general referendum on the issue.

No one needs a referendum to see that the Minneapolis police are not capable of maintaining order in the city. They should be replaced with an organization which can.
 
No one needs a referendum to see that the Minneapolis police are not capable of maintaining order in the city. They should be replaced with an organization which can.

Is there a procedure for that? Does it involve emptying a Target or destroying and defacing property?
 
I believe the procedure involves at least one city council vote.

What all exactly needs to be destroyed to get that penciled in? And what if the request is denied?
 
The implosion of the American Experiment is a slow motion event, just like Rome.
 
Liberalism brought you all the things you love about America. Conservatives resisted all the rights and freedoms liberals fought for all down the line.
You're welcome. But show a little gratitude.

So prove even one claim.
 
Liberal then and liberal now are substantially different. Do you think, for example, that universities today are genuinely liberal in the historical sense?

Liberal means the same thing it always has. You don't get to redefine words and if you're going to use your own definitions you better get used to talking to yourself. The problem you guys have is you call everything left of centre 'liberal'. Socialism, for example, is not liberalism but most on the right not only don't understand this but they continue to deny the difference when the dictionary or encyclopedia quotes are laid in front of them. It's loud, proud, determined ignorance and they reinforce it among themselves to the point where I've been told, "Everyone knows..."
 
No evidence. Just like you.

What, I'm no evidence? That quote is no evidence? What does this even mean?
You guys sure have piss-poor language skills. Half the time I have to guess what you're getting at. Let's take a shot at this one- you mean to say there's no evidence the quote is a real one but I have no evidence that there's no evidence. Am I close?
 
Liberalism brought you all the things you love about America. Conservatives resisted all the rights and freedoms liberals fought for all down the line.
You're welcome. But show a little gratitude.

You mean when they filibustered the 1964 civil rights bill? They sure have a funny way of bring us what we love, by trying to kill a bill for civil rights!
 
Liberalism, a mental disease.

Classy...now you're kicking down to folks with mental illness. You're on a roll today, lady! Is there anyone you're not willing to sacrifice on your altar to sleaziness?
 
Police for me, not for thee | washingtontimes.com



The elected Democrat Party leadership has voted to give themselves armed protection from their own voters.

Meanwhile, the same group has voted to defund and disband police for their citizens. :shock: You can't even make this up. The implosion of Democratic Party run urban cities is a complete disaster. There is simply NO SUCCESS to point to. None.

Not to worry, they will raise taxes on the rich to cover it.
 
You mean when they filibustered the 1964 civil rights bill? They sure have a funny way of bring us what we love, by trying to kill a bill for civil rights!

Liberals didn't do that, conservatives did. Don't you know that there were lots of conservative Democrats back then? Liberal Republicans too, powerful ones some of them. It wasn't until Reagan and Goldwater that the GOP became a conservative bastion and around then the southern conservatives forgave the Republican Party for Lincoln.
You need to pay closer attention and lose the hyper-partisan blinders. Republican may mean conservative now but it didn't always and Democrat never has meant liberal. Just because most liberals are Democrats in the US doesn't mean most Democrats are or ever were liberals. In fact, if you just go by this forum there's not many liberals in the US. Some, but not a lot.

Here, hope this helps...

"Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law. Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support free markets, free trade, limited government, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), capitalism, democracy, secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion."

Liberalism - Wikipedia.
 
What, I'm no evidence? That quote is no evidence? What does this even mean?
You guys sure have piss-poor language skills. Half the time I have to guess what you're getting at. Let's take a shot at this one- you mean to say there's no evidence the quote is a real one but I have no evidence that there's no evidence. Am I close?

Not one stick of evidence of any death threats. They are just making claims and are afraid. They want the people to have no police while they spend over 50K on armed guards. If you want to demonstrate, THERE is a good reason. But, none of you care a whit because those spending tax dollars for armed guards are in favor of armed insurrection. But............if they are black or white saviors of the blacks, they will be immune from the anarchists. At least for now.

Just like YOU have no evidence of what you claim in your posts.

I hope this clears things up.
 
Defund the police does not mean what you think it means. There's things in this reality call "nuances"


Defund the police means exactly what it means. If others are missing the nuance then you need to learn to speak the English language and make a new slogan that accurately reflects the proposal
 
Not one stick of evidence of any death threats. They are just making claims and are afraid. They want the people to have no police while they spend over 50K on armed guards. If you want to demonstrate, THERE is a good reason. But, none of you care a whit because those spending tax dollars for armed guards are in favor of armed insurrection. But............if they are black or white saviors of the blacks, they will be immune from the anarchists. At least for now.

Just like YOU have no evidence of what you claim in your posts.

I hope this clears things up.

Okay, we're making progress.
Which claim have I made that I have no evidence for?
 
Defund the police means exactly what it means. If others are missing the nuance then you need to learn to speak the English language and make a new slogan that accurately reflects the proposal

Thank you. For insisting on using words correctly. I'm engaged right now with some rightists who can't get it through their heads that anarchists and socialists aren't liberals.
 
Thank you. For insisting on using words correctly. I'm engaged right now with some rightists who can't get it through their heads that anarchists and socialists aren't liberals.

But they certainly have found a home in the Democratic Party. In fact if you visit the Democratic Socialists of America website and the Communist Party USA, their agendas reads like the Democratic Party's agenda.

Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) - Working towards a better future for all.
Communist Party USA – cpusa.org
 
The thread isn't about police reform. It's about the city government denying police protection to the city's citizens, while at the same time using taxpayer dollars to hire a private security firm for their own protection. It's basically a great big "**** you!" to their constituents that they swore and oath to protect.

I can't seem to recall when the Filth ever protected a citizen. After coffee, they go to the scene of the crime and investigate.
 
Okay, we're making progress.
Which claim have I made that I have no evidence for?

I really don't feel like going back and getting them.

At least we made progress with you understanding that when I said there was NO EVIDENCE, I naturally was referring to no evidence of death threats. But, in today's climate, if you are back, you are to be believed no matter what and any questioning of motives or claims is considered being racist.

Which reminds me, a few of you have claimed there is rampant or institutionalized racism.This is another CLAIM that is not documented. If anything, it is just the opposite. Society is BEGGING blacks to let them know what offends them and generally ass kissing, if you want the truth. Most people are afraid to say anything for fear of "offending" the snowflake black people.
 
No, I haven't.

He really should change his title though, imo, to Leftism is a mental disease.
Today's leftists are far from being liberals. They're authoritarians.

Actually, we're revolutionaries.
 
Back
Top Bottom