• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ahmaud Arbery was boxed in by 2 trucks repeatedly as he tried to escape, suspect used racial slur as

AmNat said:
Georgia law allows citizens to detain a person immediately after a crime (such as trespassing, which Arbery committed on video right before the McMichaels attempted to detain him). It also allows people attacked by criminals to defend themselves with no duty to retreat. Which is why they were originally not charged.
Click to expand...
Your ignorance of the law is astounding. Your persistence in shouting your ignorance is appalling. I think you're in the wrong forum. I think you meant to be on 8 Chan.
 
ClaraD said:
you are defending a guy who used instagram to call people the N word and blow that fn n words head off.
Click to expand...
That is WHY he is defending him.
 
What if...? said:
So the looters WERE white supremacists!

Of course I knew that when Barr said it was antifa.
Click to expand...

all whites have a gene for power. The Christians have the necessary dual nature of the newborn human spirit to combat that tendency and keep it in check. All blacks have the gene for violence. The Christian blacks have the dual nature the newborn human spirit to restrain this.

Get saved! [emoji39]
 
Rexedgar said:
My best bud in the army was Hawaiian. Taught me that term and “popolo.”


You post like you are an ocean east of Hawaii.........
Click to expand...

Let’s run a scenario ok?
We are having a little get together with them men, blacks locals, couple honkeys. Me, the Samoan in the group starts talking smack on BLM, making jokes, whiteys are chuckling.. then, one of my black brothers punches me in the face, I apologize. And by next weekend in the same group, we are all good and the bruthas are referring to my as my nig***. You can see that right? We are all brothers.
 
free press said:
Let’s run a scenario ok?
We are having a little get together with them men, blacks locals, couple honkeys. Me, the Samoan in the group starts talking smack on BLM, making jokes, whiteys are chuckling.. then, one of my black brothers punches me in the face, I apologize. And by next weekend in the same group, we are all good and the bruthas are referring to my as my nig***. You can see that right? We are all brothers.
Click to expand...

OK, Holmes..........
 
free press said:
all whites have a gene for power. The Christians have the necessary dual nature of the newborn human spirit to combat that tendency and keep it in check. All blacks have the gene for violence. The Christian blacks have the dual nature the newborn human spirit to restrain this.

Get saved! [emoji39]
Click to expand...

Ah you're a so called "Christian" and a "Racist"! :roll:
 
AmNat said:
Then how did they mention it while calling 911? Clairvoyance?



I'll need to know what part of the law differentiates chases from other citizens arrests.
Click to expand...

It wasn't mentioned.
 
AmNat said:
Did you see the house in question? It looked like any other house from the outside.
Click to expand...

Idk where you live but no houses around here look like this from the street. You can even hear the neighbor answer the 911 dispatcher when she asks if Arbery is breaking in, the guy says NO the house is all open.

English 1.jpg
 
AmNat said:
Georgia law allows citizens to detain a person immediately after a crime (such as trespassing, which Arbery committed on video right before the McMichaels attempted to detain him). It also allows people attacked by criminals to defend themselves with no duty to retreat. Which is why they were originally not charged.
Click to expand...

Yes we get that, but the problem is no effort was made to investigate at first. They just took the suspects' word for it because they're white, one was a former cop, and Arbery was black and a suspected burglar.

A man gets shot, the police and DA can't just say, 'Yup sounds about right' and close the case.

Why? Look what comes out when proper procedure is followed.
 
AmNat said:
Georgia law allows citizens to detain a person immediately after a crime (such as trespassing, which Arbery committed on video right before the McMichaels attempted to detain him). It also allows people attacked by criminals to defend themselves with no duty to retreat. Which is why they were originally not charged.
Click to expand...

My impression is that Arbery was the one attacked by criminals. You seem to be missing the point. Those fools suspected him of a crime, probably a misdemeanor. (How did they know his family didn’t own the building?). “Let’s get guns, guys, and teach that boy a lesson.” Whether or not the set out to kill him, from what we know their actions bring to mind those of a lynch mob.

Question: would you not charge them?
 
AmNat said:
I'm going to need a source for the claim that entering a house without permission is legal by default in Georgia.
Click to expand...

It wasn't a house. It was a construction site. There were no entrance doors or garage doors.
 
So I missed that this trial was on until almost over but I started watching this video and at the 39 second mark this man states exactly what was seen in the blurry photo I did a screen shot of from a YT video. Here is the screen shot.

gun up-focus 2.jpg

 
AmNat said:
Georgia law allows citizens to detain a person immediately after a crime (such as trespassing, which Arbery committed on video right before the McMichaels attempted to detain him). It also allows people attacked by criminals to defend themselves with no duty to retreat. Which is why they were originally not charged.
Click to expand...


It’s pretty obvious by now that they weren’t charged because they had a string they could pull, and that the evidence was going to go away. Until someone f%$d up, and the evidence surfaced. Till then, they thought they had gotten away with it.
 
AmNat said:
Are you not a native English speaker? Let me rephrase:

The sentences that you posted, which I quoted in post 81, are not found within any Georgia law.
Click to expand...

ClaraD had initially referenced a lawyer's interpretation of the law, and of what the word "notice" meant, when pasting that part of the text in her original post. I suppose it was this one, but I'm not certain:

Understanding Trespassing Charges: Andersen, Tate & Carr, P.C.

In case, you don't believe that particular lawyer's interpretation we can refer to cases that indicate Georgia case law supports the idea that notice can be in written form:

Georgia v. Harper :: 2018 :: Supreme Court of Georgia Decisions :: Georgia Case Law :: Georgia Law :: US Law :: Justia

Page 4

In this sense, while giving a person express notice through spoken or written words that his or her entry is prohibited can be sufficiently explicit and reasonable for purposes of OCGA § 16-7-21(b) (2) (see, e.g., Rayburn, supra; McCrosky v. State, 234Ga. App. 321(1) (506 SE2d400)(1998)), that does not mean that spoken and written words are the only means by which reasonable notice could be given to a would-be trespasser that would explicitly notify that person that his or her entry is prohibited.
Click to expand...
 
W_Heisenberg said:
In this sense, while giving a person express notice through spoken or written words that his or her entry is prohibited can be sufficiently explicit and reasonable for purposes of OCGA § 16-7-21(b) (2) (see, e.g., Rayburn, supra; McCrosky v. State, 234Ga. App. 321(1) (506 SE2d400)(1998)), that does not mean that spoken and written words are the only means by which reasonable notice could be given to a would-be trespasser that would explicitly notify that person that his or her entry is prohibited.

Page 4
Click to expand...

Interesting. I'm trying to understand what other ways you can indicate "No Tresspassing" other than spoken or written words? I'm guessing it boils down to whatever the white guy imagines he communicated to the black guy. Or maybe it means you just fly a pirate flag over your house and people will know that way.
 
Nickyjo said:
My impression is that Arbery was the one attacked by criminals. You seem to be missing the point. Those fools suspected him of a crime, probably a misdemeanor. (How did they know his family didn’t own the building?). “Let’s get guns, guys, and teach that boy a lesson.” Whether or not the set out to kill him, from what we know their actions bring to mind those of a lynch mob.

Question: would you not charge them?
Click to expand...

AmNat has previously expressed views sympathetic to the political ideology of white supremacy.



[W:430]Senate removes phrase 'white nationalist' from measure meant to screen military enlistees

Read post #36

AmNat said:
Good. Being a patriot (what leftists refer to as a "white nationalist") shouldn't bar one from serving in the military.
Click to expand...

Read post #46

AmNat said:
Of course it’s patriotic to want to perverse your nation for future generations.
Click to expand...

Read post #47

AmNat said:
I value the opinion of the Founding Fathers, who intended this to be a white nation, over that of Congress or the Pentagon.
Click to expand...

You will not make any progress with AmNat.

In AmNat's view the men who killed Ahmaud Arbery will always be innocent because they are white and Ahmaud Arbery will always be deserving of death because he's black.

There is nothing you will ever say or write to change AmNat's views on the matter. The only fact that matters to him is the color of Ahmaud Arbery's skin.
 
AmNat said:
Georgia law allows citizens to detain a person immediately after a crime (such as trespassing, which Arbery committed on video right before the McMichaels attempted to detain him)..
Click to expand...

No. Georgia law allows citizens to detain a person immediately after a crime THEY HAVE PERSONALLY WITNESSED. AND Georgia law doesn't allow you to shoot them if they don't want to be detained.
 
Still watching the replay of today's hearing, but along with the video showing Travis raising the shotgun as Arbery approaches, he also admitted to pointing it at him and giving orders. Roddy admitted to trying to trying to redirect Arbery by blocking him with his vehicle.

Defense is going to have to pull a rabbit out of a hat to get around what these fools did and have admitted to doing.
 
Last edited:
W_Heisenberg said:
AmNat has previously expressed views sympathetic to the political ideology of white supremacy.



[W:430]Senate removes phrase 'white nationalist' from measure meant to screen military enlistees

Read post #36



Read post #46



Read post #47



You will not make any progress with AmNat.

In AmNat's view the men who killed Ahmaud Arbery will always be innocent because they are white and Ahmaud Arbery will always be deserving of death because he's black.

There is nothing you will ever say or write to change AmNat's views on the matter. The only fact that matters to him is the color of Ahmaud Arbery's skin.
Click to expand...

I do believe that AmNat = American Nationalist

So of course you are right as rain.
 
Last edited:
This is awful. I'm glad more evidence is coming out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom